Pushing, pulling and manoeuvring an industrial cart: a psychophysiological study

References

• Martin JB, Chaffin DB. Biomechanical computerized simulation of human strength in sagittal-plane activities. AIIE Trans. 1972;4(1):19–28. doi: 10.1080/05695557208974824
   Google Scholar
• Hoozemans MJM, Van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MHW, et al. Low-back and shoulder complaints among workers with pushing and pulling tasks. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002;28(5):293–303. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth J, Harkness EF, Silman AJ, et al. The role of workplace low-level mechanical trauma, posture and environment in the onset of chronic widespread pain. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42:1486–1494. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness EF, Macfarlane GJ, Nahit E, et al. Mechanical injury and psychosocial factors in the work place predict the onset of widespread body pain: a two-year prospective study among cohorts of newly employed workers. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2004;50(5):1655–1664. doi: 10.1002/art.20258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roffey DM, Wai EK, Bishop P, et al. Causal assessment of occupational pushing or pulling and low back pain: results of a systematic review. Spine J. 2010;10:544–553. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karwowski W, Siemionow W, Gielo-Perczak K. Physical neuroergonomics: the human brain in control of physical work activities. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2003;4(1–2):175–199. doi: 10.1080/1463922021000032339
   Google Scholar
• Resnick ML, Chaffin DB. An ergonomic evaluation of handle height and load in maximal and submaximal cart pushing. Appl Ergon. 1995;26(3):173–178. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00014-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Eisawi KW, Kerk CJ, Congleton JJ, et al. The effect of handle height and cart load on the initial hand forces in cart pushing and pulling. Ergonomics. 1999;42(8):1099–1113. doi: 10.1080/001401399185162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Beek AJ, Hoozemans MJM, Frings-Dresen MHW, et al. Assessment of exposure to pushing and pulling in epidemiological field studies: an overview of methods, exposure measures, and measurement strategies. Int J Ind Ergon. 1999;24(4):417–429. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00008-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett AI, Desai SD, Todd AI, et al. The effects of load and gradient on hand force responses during dynamic pushing and pulling tasks. Ergonomics SA. 2008;20(1):3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chow AY, Dickerson CR. Determinants and magnitudes of manual force strengths and joint moments during two-handed standing maximal horizontal pushing and pulling. Ergonomics. 2016;59(4):534–544. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1075605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim N, Kamat SR, Halim I, et al. A study on push–pull analysis associated with awkward posture among workers in aerospace industry. Int J Res Eng Technol. 2014;3(1):233–239. doi: 10.15623/ijret.2014.0301040
   Google Scholar
• Das B, Wang Y. Isometric pull–push strengths in workspace: 1. Strength profiles. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2004;10(1):43–58. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2004.11076594
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee J, Nussbaum MA, Kyung G. Effects of work experience on work methods during dynamic pushing and pulling. Int J Ind Ergon. 2014;44:647–653. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das B, Black NL. Isometric pull and push strengths of paraplegics in the workspace: 2. Statistical analysis of spatial factors. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2000;6(1):67–80. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2000.11076444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Argubi-Wollesen A, Wollesen B, Leitner M, et al. Human body mechanics of pushing and pulling: analyzing the factors of task-related strain on the musculoskeletal system. Saf Health Work. 2017;8(1):11–18. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook SH, Ciriello VM. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics. 1991;34(9):1197–1213. doi: 10.1080/00140139108964855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomics – manual handling – part 2: pushing and pulling. Geneva: ISO; 2007. Standard No. 11228-2:2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson L, Sperling L, Gard G, et al. Swedish anthropometrics for product and workplace design. Appl Ergon. 2009;40:797–806. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuebbe P, Genaidy A, Karwowski W, et al. The relationships between biomechanical and postural stresses, musculoskeletal injury rates, and perceived body discomfort experienced by industrial workers: a field study. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2002;8(2):259–280. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2002.11076528
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcin M, Cravic JY, Vandewalle H, et al. Physiological strains while pushing or hauling. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;72:478–482. doi: 10.1007/BF00242278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd AI. Impact of hand forces and start/stop frequency on physiological responses to three forms of pushing and pulling: a South African perspective. Work. 2012;41:1588–1593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandfeld J, Rosgaard C, Jensen BR. L4–L5 compression and anterior/posterior joint shear forces in cabin attendants during the initial push/pull actions of airplane meal carts. Appl Ergon. 2014;45:1067–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson GF, Russel CA. Real-time assessment of mental workload using psychophysiological measures and artificial neural networks. Hum Factors. 2003;45(4):635–644. doi: 10.1518/hfes.45.4.635.27088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman R. Neuroergonomics: research and practice. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2003;4(1–2):5–20. doi: 10.1080/14639220210199753
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R. Neuroergonomics: brain, cognition, and performance at work. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2011;20:181–186. doi: 10.1177/0963721411409176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman R, Wilson GF. Putting the brain to work: neuroergonomics past, present, and future. Hum Factors. 2008;50(3):468–474. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buettner R, Sauer S, Maier C, et al. Towards ex ante prediction of user performance: a novel NeuroIS methodology based on real-time measurement of mental effort. Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); 2015 Jan 5–8; Kauai, HI. Los Alamitos (CA): CPS Conference Publishing Services; 2015. p. 533–542.
   Google Scholar
• Gevins A, Smith ME. Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human–computer interaction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2003;4(1–2):113–131. doi: 10.1080/14639220210159717
   Google Scholar
• De Waard D. The measurement of drivers’ mental workload [dissertation]. Groningen: Rijks Universiteit Groningen; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta RK, Parasuraman R. Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouscein W. Electrodermal activity. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dementienko VV, Dorokhov VB, Koreneva LG, et al. The hypothesis of the nature of electrodermal reactions. Hum Physiol. 2000;26:232–239. doi: 10.1007/BF02760098
   Google Scholar
• Branković S. Interlinked positive and negative feedback loops design emotional sweating. Psychiatr Danub. 2011;23(1):10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlisch O, Schaefer F. Physiological changes during computer tasks: responses to mental load or to motor demands? Ergonomics. 1996;39(2):213–224. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake S. Multivariate workload evaluation combining physiological and subjective measures. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;40:233–238. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00191-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldauf D, Burgard E, Wittmann M. Time perception as a workload measure in simulated car driving. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(5):929–935. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer B, Mehler B. The impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers: a field study and simulation validation. Ergonomics. 2011;54(10):932–942. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.604431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajiwara S. Evaluation of driver’s mental workload by facial temperature and electrodermal activity under simulated driving conditions. Int J Automot Technol. 2014;15(1):65–70. doi: 10.1007/s12239-014-0007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just MA, Carpenter PA, Miyake A. Neuroindices of cognitive workload: neuroimaging, pupillometric, and event-related potential studies of brain work. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2003;4(1–2):56–88. doi: 10.1080/14639220210159735
   Google Scholar
• Hoozemans MJM, Kuijer PPFM, Kingma I, et al. Mechanical loading of the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling activities. Ergonomics. 2004;47:1–18. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001593577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapik GG, Marras WS. Spine loading at different lumbar levels during pushing and pulling. Ergonomics. 2009;52:60–70. doi: 10.1080/00140130802480828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lett KK, McGill SM. Pushing and pulling: personal mechanics influence spine loads. Ergonomics. 2006;49(9):895–908. doi: 10.1080/00140130600665869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marras WS, Knapik GG, Ferguson S. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24:155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schibye B, Sogaard K, Martinsen D, et al. Mechanical load on the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling of two-wheeled waste containers compared with lifting and carrying of bags and bins. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16:549–559. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00039-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton N, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, et al. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2005. Chapter 13, Psychophysical tables: lifting, lowering, pushing, pulling, and carrying; p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson G, Hagman J, Talianzadeh R, et al. Effect of cognitive load on postural control. Brain Res Bull. 2002;58(1):135–139. doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00770-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layer KJ, Karwowski W, Furr A. The effect of cognitive demands and perceived quality of work life on human performance in manufacturing environments. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39:413–421. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.015 doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG. Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. Am Psychol. 1990;45(I):16–28. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.1.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassi JL. Psychophysiology: human behavior and physiological response. 5th ed. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum; 2007. Chapter 9, Electrodermal activity (EDA) and behavior; p. 192–213.
   Google Scholar
• Lang PJ, Greenwald MK, Bradley MM, et al. Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioural reactions. Psychophysiology. 1993;30:261–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapalainen E, Seungjun K, Forlizzi JF, et al. Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive load. Proceedings of UbiComp; 2010 Sep 26–29; Copenhagen, Denmark. New York (NY): ACM Press; 2010. p. 301–310.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson ME, Seheil AM, Filion DL. The electrodermal system. In Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, editors. Handbook of psychophysiology. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 200–223.
   Google Scholar
• Lang P, Bradley M. Appetitive and defensive motivation is the substrate of emotion. In Elliot A, editor. Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis; 2008. p. 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Devereux JJ, Buckle PW, Vlachonikolis IG. Interactions between physical and psychosocial risk factors at work increase the risk of back disorders: an epidemiological approach. Occup Environ Med. 1999;56:343–353. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.5.343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, et al. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2114–2125. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis KG, Heaney CA. The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and low back pain: underlying methodological issues. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000;15:389–406. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00101-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrdad R, Dennerlein JT, Haghighat M, et al. Association between psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal symptoms among Iranian nurses. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53:1032–1039. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandryk RL, Atkins MS. A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2007;65:329–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco A, Valenza G, Citi L, et al. Arousal and valence recognition of affective sounds based on electrodermal activity. IEEE Sens J. 2017;17(3):716–725. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2623677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley KM, Mochizuki G, Mcllroy WE. Perturbation-evoked electrodermal activity responds to instability, not just motor or sensory drives. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:619–625. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Looze MP, Van Greuningen K, Rebel J, et al. Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling. Ergonomics. 2000;43(3):377–390. doi: 10.1080/001401300184477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koradecka D, Pośniak M, Widerszal-Bazyl M, et al. A comparative study of objective and subjective assessment of occupational risk. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2010;16(1):3–22. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2010.11076826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenbroek J, De Bruin R. Enhancing the use of anthropometric data. In De Waard D, Brookhuis KA, Van Egmond R, Boersema TH, editors. Human factors in design, safety, and management. Maastricht: Shaker; 2005. p. 289–297.
   Google Scholar