Influence of visual clutter on the effect of navigated safety inspection: a case study on elevator installation

References

• Ferrer V, Yang Y, Perdomo A, et al. Consider your clutter: perception of virtual object motion in AR. In: 12th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality; 2013 Oct 1–4; Adelaide, Australia. Washington (WA): IEEE Computer Society; 2013. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Yang K, Du EY, Delp EJ, et al. A new approach of visual clutter analysis for pedestrian detection. In: 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems: Intelligent Transportation Systems for All Modes; 2013 Oct 6–9; Hague, Netherlands. New York (NY): IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2013. p. 1173–1178.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock K. Model of safety inspection. Saf Sci. 2014;62(2):145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.021
   Google Scholar
• Jagars-Cohen C, Menches C, Jangid Y, et al. Priority-ranking workload reduction strategies to address challenges of transportation construction inspection. Transport Res Rec J Transport Res Board. 2009;2098(2098):13–17. doi: 10.3141/2098-02
   Google Scholar
• Tixier JP, Hallowell MR, Rajagopalan B, et al. Construction safety clash detection: identifying safety incompatibilities among fundamental attributes using data mining. Automat Constr. 2016;74(11):39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chi S. Real-time information support for strategic safety inspection on construction sites. In: 30th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining; 2013 Aug 11–15; Montréal, Canada. London: International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction; 2013. p. 506–513.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci. 2001;24(1):87–114. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01003922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck SJ. Visual short-term memory. In: Luck SJ, Hollingworth A, editors. Visual memory. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 43–86.
   Google Scholar
• Miura T. Active function of eye movement and useful field of view in a realistic setting. In: Groner R, D’Ydewalle G, Parham R, editors. From eye to mind: information acquisition in perception, search, and reading. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1990. p. 119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Lim JH, Tsimhoni O, Liu Y. Investigation of driver performance with night vision and pedestrian detection systems – part I: empirical study on visual clutter and glance behavior. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2010;11(3):670–677. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2010.2049843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodine CF, Mello-Thoms C, Kundel HL, et al. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(4):917–923. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.4.1790917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA. Expertise. Curr Biol. 2014;24(11):R508–R510. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyns PG, Rodet L. Categorization creates functional features. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997;23(3):681–696. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout MC, Goldinger SD. Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015;77(1):128–149. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster D, Rivera J, Sellers BC, et al. Perceptual training for visual search. Ergonomics. 2013;56(7):1101–1115. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.790481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Jeary A. The effects of experience & interruption in predicting the error & performance rate for a construction inspection task. Neur Comp Appl. 2016;21(6):1191–1204.
   Google Scholar
• Perlman A, Sacks R, Barak R. Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf Sci. 2014;64(4):22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.019
   Google Scholar
• Navon R, Kolton O. Model for automated monitoring of fall hazards in building construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 2006;132(7):733–740. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:7(733)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi S, Caldas CH. Image-based safety assessment: automated spatial safety risk identification of earthmoving and surface mining activities. J Constr Eng Manage. 2012;138(3):341–351. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980;32(1):3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recarte MA, Nunes LM. Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2003;9(2):119–137. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.9.2.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmieder DE, Weathersby MR. Detection performance in clutter with variable resolution. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 1983;AES-19(4):622–630. doi: 10.1109/TAES.1983.309351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyon-Poulin P, Robert JM, Robert JM. Effects of visual clutter on pilot workload, flight performance and gaze pattern. In: International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction in Aerospace; 2014 Jul 31–Aug 1; Santa Clara, CA. New York (NY): ACM Press; 2014. p. 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Toet A. Matched filtering determines human visual search in natural images. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011;8014(3):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ho G, Scialfa CT, Caird JK, et al. Visual search for traffic signs: the effects of clutter, luminance, and aging. Hum Factors. 2001;43(2):194–207. doi: 10.1518/001872001775900922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersema T, Zwaga HJG, Adams AS. Conspicuity in realistic scenes: an eye-movement measure. Appl Ergon. 1989;20(4):267–273. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(89)90189-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley C, Ball K, Sloane ME, et al. Visual/cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. Psychol Aging. 1991;6(3):403–415. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.6.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camba J, Contero M, Johnson M. Management of visual clutter in annotated 3D CAD models: a comparative study. In: 16th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction; 2014 Jun 22–27; Crete, Greece. Zurich: Springer; 2014. p. 405–416.
   Google Scholar
• Chan AHS, Chan CY. Validating the random search model for a double-target search task. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2000;1(2):157–167. doi: 10.1080/14639220050171315
   Google Scholar
• Chan AH, Yu R. Validating the random search model for two targets of different difficulty. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;110(1):167–180. doi: 10.2466/pms.110.1.167-180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury CG. Inspection of sheet materials – model and data. Hum Factors. 1975;17(3):257–265. doi: 10.1177/001872087501700305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitz G, Drury CG. Inspection of sheet materials – test of model predictions. Hum Factors. 1978;20(5):521–528. doi: 10.1177/001872087802000502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megaw ED. Factors affecting visual inspection accuracy. Appl Ergon. 1979;10(1):27–32. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(79)90006-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodine CF, Kundel HL. Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. Radiographics. 1987;7(6):1241–1250. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.7.6.3423330
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nothdurft H-C. Attention shifts to salient targets. Vision Res. 2002;42(10):1287–1306. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00016-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes J. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010;135(2):77–99. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelhano MS, Henderson JM. Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007;33(4):753–763. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neider MB, Zelinsky GJ. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search. Vision Res. 2006;46(14):2217–2235. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo MJ, Farid H. The specificity of the search template. J Vis. 2009;9(1):34. doi: 10.1167/9.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo MJ, Farid H. Task demands determine the specificity of the search template. Atten Percept Psycho. 2012;74(1):124–131. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0224-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm GL, Henderson JM. The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. J Vis. 2009;9(11):8. doi: 10.1167/9.11.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS, Kenner N, et al. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Res. 2004;44(12):1411–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery TJ, King L-W, Jiang Y. Setting up the target template in visual search. J Vis. 2005;5(1):8. doi: 10.1167/5.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone R, Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18(1):193–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar MA, Flusberg S, Wolfe JM. The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search. Percept Psychophys. 2008;70(2):314–328. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.2.314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frings C, Wentura D, Wühr P. On the fate of distractor representations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012;38(3):570–575. doi: 10.1037/a0027781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd EW, Mitroff SR. Attentional guidance by working memory overrides salience cues in visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013;39(6):1786–1796. doi: 10.1037/a0032548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman AM, Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980;12(1):97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidhar G, Rotman SR. Modeling human search and target acquisition performance: IV. detection probability in the cluttered environment. Opt Eng. 1994;33(3):801–808. doi: 10.1117/12.160980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz R, Li Y, Nakano L. Measuring visual clutter. J Vis. 2007;7(2):17. doi: 10.1167/7.2.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz R, Li Y, Mansfield J, et al. Feature congestion: a measure of display clutter. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2005 Apr 2–7; Portland, OR. New York (NY): ACM Press; 2005. p. 761–770.
   Google Scholar
• Unema PJA, Pannasch S, Joos M, et al. Time course of information processing during scene perception: the relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration. Vis Cogn. 2005;12(3):473–494. doi: 10.1080/13506280444000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velichkovsky BM. From levels of processing to stratification of cognition. Vopr Psikhol. 1999;4:58–74.
   Google Scholar
• Velichkovsky BM, Rothert A, Kopf M, et al. Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception. Transp Res F Traffic Psychol Bahav. 2002;5(2):145–156. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00013-X
   Google Scholar
• Zuo W, Yuan H, Shang Y, et al. Calculation of a health index of oil-paper transformers insulation with binary logistic regression. Math Probl Eng. 2016;2016(7):1–9. doi: 10.1155/2016/6069784
   Google Scholar
• Chelune GJ, Bornstein RA, Prifitera A. The Wechsler memory scale-revised: current status and applications. Adv Psychol Assess. 1990;7:65–99. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0555-2_3
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2013.
   Google Scholar