Interdependency of construction safety hazards from a network perspective: a mechanical installation case

References

• General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of People’s Republic of China. [ Occupational health and safety management systems]. Beijng: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of People’s Republic of China; 2011. Standard No. GB/T28001-2011. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Zhi-qiang H, Ya-mei Z. Research on risk assessment technology of the major hazard in harbor engineering. Procedia Eng. 2016;137:843–848. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.324
   Google Scholar
• Kim H, Ahn CR, Yang K. Identifying safety hazards using collective bodily responses of workers. J Constr Eng Manag. 2017;143(2):04016090. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahata K, Zayed T. Integrated risk-assessment framework for municipal infrastructure. J Constr Eng Manag. 2016;142(1):04015052. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T-T, Wang C-H. Fall risk assessment of bridge construction using Bayesian network transferring from fault tree analysis. J Civ Eng Manag. 2017;23(2):273–282. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2015.1068841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamukcu C. Analysis and management of risks experienced in tunnel construction. Acta Montan Slovaca. 2015;20(4):271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinowsky P, Diekmann J, Galotti V. Social network model of construction. J Constr Eng Manag. 2008;134(10):804–812. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(804)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagno E, Caron F, Mancini M. A multi-dimensional analysis of major risks in complex projects. Risk Manage. 2007;9(1):1–18. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8250014
   Google Scholar
• Ouédraogo A, Groso A, Meyer T. Risk analysis in research environment – part ii: weighting lab criticity index using the analytic hierarchy process. Saf Sci. 2011;49(6):785–793. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jannadi OA, Almishari S. Risk assessment in construction. J Constr Eng Manag. 2003;129(1):492–500. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:5(492)
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich HW. Industrial accident prevention: a scientific approach. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1941.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellén U, Hovden J. Reducing risks by deviation control – a retrospection into a research strategy. Saf Sci. 1993;16(3–4):417–438. doi: 10.1016/0925-7535(93)90062-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H-J, Reinschmidt KF. Association of risk attitude with market diversification in the construction business. J Manag Eng. 2011;27(2):66–74. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljassmi H, Han S. Analysis of causes of construction defects using fault trees and risk importance measures. J Constr Eng Manag. 2013;139(7):870–880. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long DN, Dai QT, Chandrawinata MP. Predicting safety risk of working at heights using Bayesian networks. J Constr Eng Manag. 2016;142(9):04016041. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RJ, Zou PXW. Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model. Build Environ. 2014;73(1):208–222. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014
   Google Scholar
• Pinto A. QRAM a qualitative occupational safety risk assessment model for the construction industry that incorporate uncertainties by the use of fuzzy sets. Saf Sci. 2014;63(3):57–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.019
   Google Scholar
• Leu SS, Chang CM. Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;54(2):122–133. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bond SD, Carlson KA, Keeney RL. Generating objectives: can decision makers articulate what they want? Manage Sci. 2008;54(1):56–70. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan N, Davis J, Godfrey P. Ten steps to managing strategic risk – a holistic approach. Proc ICE-Civ Eng. 2007;160(3):137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tah JHM, Carr V. A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic. Constr Manage Econ. 2000;18(4):491–500. doi: 10.1080/01446190050024905
   Google Scholar
• Sawacha E, Naoum S, Fong D. Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. Int J Proj Manage. 1999;17(5):309–315. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00042-8
   Google Scholar
• Luo Z, Li K, Ma X, et al. A new accident analysis method based on complex network and cascading failure. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc. 2013;2013(2):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta D, Sharma M, Trivedi AS. Risk management in construction projects of developing countries. J Eng Res Appl. 2015;5(11):154–156.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi M, Behzadian K, Ardeshir A, et al. Comprehensive risk management using fuzzy FMEA and MCDA techniques in highway construction projects. J Civ Eng Manage. 2017;23(2):300–310. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2015.1068847
   Google Scholar
• Fang C, Marle F, Zio E, et al. Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2012;106(2):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Marle F, Vidal L-A, Bocquet J-C. Interactions-based risk clustering methodologies and algorithms for complex project management. Int J Prod Econ. 2013;142(2):225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y. [ Introduction to security economics]. Beijing: China Quality Inspection Press; 2013. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow C. Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nohria N, Eccles RG. Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action. Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev IEEE Trans on. 1992;28(2):173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Pryke SD. Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis. Constr Manage Econ. 2004;22(8):787–797. doi: 10.1080/0144619042000206533
   Google Scholar
• Allan N, Yin Y. Development of a methodology for understanding the potency of risk connectivity. J Manage Eng. 2011;27(2):75–79. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan N, Davis J. Strategic risks – thinking about them differently. Proc Inst Civ Eng-Civ Eng. 2006;159(6):10–14. doi: 10.1680/cien.2006.159.6.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosleh A, Bier VM, Apostolakis G. A critique of current practice for the use of expert opinions in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1988;20(1):63–85. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(88)90006-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montibeller G, von Winterfeldt D. Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Anal. 2015;35(7):1230–1251. doi: 10.1111/risa.12360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Currie G. Against beck in defense of risk analysis. Philos Soc Sci. 2006;36(2):149–172. doi: 10.1177/0048393106287209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FJ. [ Network theory-based analysis of cost risk analysis model in construction project] [master’s thesis]. Shenzhen: Shenzhen University; 2015. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Tixier J-P, Hallowell MR, Rajagopalan B, et al. Construction safety clash detection: identifying safety incompatibilities among fundamental attributes using data mining. Autom Constr. 2017;74:39–54. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JT, Sun CY, Wang SJ. [Applied statistics]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press; 2015. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Shen ZP, Wang Y, Gao J. [Consequent-antecedent retrospective table for human errors]. J Tsinghua Univ (natural science). 2005;10(3):17–21. Chinese. DOI:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2005.06.021
   Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Mccoy A, Kleiner B, et al. Integrating safety culture into OSH risk mitigation: a pilot study on the electrical safety. J Civ Eng Manage. 2016;241(6):335–344.
   Google Scholar
• Selvam P. Health and safety management system guideline for elevator installation site. Paper presented at: National Conference on Optimization Techniques in Engineering Sciences and Technologies; 2016 Mar 18–19; Erode, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Adekomaya SO, Akinyemi OO. Prediction and probabilistic analysis of accidents in elevator installation – Nigerian experience. Innov Syst Des Eng. 2014;5(4):62–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA. Activity-based safety risk quantification for concrete formwork construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 2009;135(10):990–998. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). San Diego (CA): Elsevier; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Shi YG, Fu ZQ, Zheng M. [ Application of LEC method in non-coal mine safety evaluation]. Gold. 2009;9:33–36. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Katz L. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika. 1953;18(1):39–43. doi: 10.1007/BF02289026
   Google Scholar
• Wellman B. The community question: the intimate networks of East Yorkers. Am J Sociol. 1979;84(5):1201–1231. doi: 10.1086/226906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Iacobucci D. Sequential social network data. Psychometrika. 1988;53(2):261–282. doi: 10.1007/BF02294137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J. [ Theory and application of social network dynamic analysis and simulation experiments]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press; 2012. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, et al. Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(6):989–1004. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Reliability analysis and operator modelling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1996;52(3):327–337. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00143-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Han SH, Rojas EM, et al. Social network analysis of collaborative ventures for overseas construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 2011;137(5):344–355. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenfeld O, Sacks R, Rosenfeld Y. ‘CHASTE’: construction hazard assessment with spatial and temporal exposure. Constr Manage Econ. 2009;27(7):625–638. doi: 10.1080/01446190903002771
   Google Scholar
• Luo X, Li H, Huang T, et al. Quantifying hazard exposure using real-time location data of construction workforce and equipment. J Constr Eng Manag. 2016;142(8):04016031. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Liao PC, Ma X, et al. [ Using Bayesian network to develop a probability assessment approach for construction safety risk]. China Civil Engineering Journal. 2010;1(43):384–391. Chinese.
   Google Scholar