The effect of dynamic friction with wet fabrics on skin wetness perception

References

• Flouris AD. Functional architecture of behavioural thermoregulation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(1):1–8. doi:doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1602-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aly R, Shirley C, Cunico B, et al. Effect of prolonged occlusion on the microbial flora, pH, carbon dioxide and transepidermal water loss on human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;71(6):378–381. doi:doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12556778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokura H, Sukigara S. Evaluation of the wetness of pantiliners. Text Res J. 2010;80(16):1643–1647. doi: 10.1177/0040517510365955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley IM. The synthetic experiment. Am J Psychol. 1900;11(3):405–425. doi:doi: 10.2307/1412750
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri D, Fournet D, Hodder S, et al. Why wet feels wet? A neurophysiological model of human cutaneous wetness sensitivity. J Neurophysiol. 2014;112(6):1457–1469. doi:doi: 10.1152/jn.00120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollies NRS, Custer AG, Morin CJ, et al. A human perception analysis approach to clothing comfort. Text Res J. 1979;49(10):557–564. doi: 10.1177/004051757904901001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Plante AM, Holcombe BV. Fiber hygroscopicity and perceptions of dampness. 2. Physical-mechanisms. Text Res J. 1995;65(6):316–324. doi: 10.1177/004051759506500602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong K, Hollies NRS, Spivak SM. Dynamic moisture vapor transfer through textiles. 1. Clothing hygrometry and the influence of fiber type. Text Res J. 1988;58(12):697–706. doi:doi: 10.1177/004051758805801203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Plante AM, Holcombe BV. The physical mechanisms of the perception of dampness in fabrics. J Therm Biol. 1993;18(5–6):417–419. doi: 10.1016/0306-4565(93)90069-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow RM, Osczevski RJ. The interaction of water with fabrics. Text Res J. 1998;68(4):280–288. doi: 10.1177/004051759806800406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang K-pM, Kan C-w, Fan J-t. Assessing and predicting the subjective wetness sensation of textiles: subjective and objective evaluation. Text Res J. 2015;85(8):838–849. doi:doi: 10.1177/0040517514555799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenins P. Influence of fiber type and moisture on measured fabric-to-skin friction. Text Res J. 1994;64(12):722–728. doi:doi: 10.1177/004051759406401204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwosdow AR, Stevens JC, Berglund LG, et al. Skin friction and fabric sensations in neutral and warm environments. Text Res J. 1986;56(9):574–580. doi: 10.1177/004051758605600909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukigara S, Niwa M. Analysis of ‘wet’ sensation for lingerie fabrics. Int J Cloth Sci Tech. 1997;9(3):214–219. doi:doi: 10.1108/09556229710168342
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri D, Redortier B, Hodder S, et al. Thermal and tactile interactions in the perception of local skin wetness at rest and during exercise in thermo-neutral and warm environments. Neuroscience. 2014;258(1):121–130. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergmann Tiest WM, Kosters ND, Kappers AML, et al. Haptic perception of wetness. Acta Psychol. 2012;141(2):159–163. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerley R, Olausson H, Wessberg J, et al. Wetness perception across body sites. Neurosci Lett. 2012;522(1):73–77. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang KPM, Kan CW, Fan JT. Psychophysical measurement of wet and clingy sensation of fabrics by the volar forearm test. J Sens Stud. 2015;30(4):329–347. doi:doi: 10.1111/joss.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC). Dimensional changes of fabrics after home laundering. Research Triangle Park (NC): AATCC; 2014. Standard No. AATCC 135:2014.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC). Liquid moisture management properties of textile fabrics. Research Triangle Park (NC): AATCC; 2010. Standard No. AATCC 195:2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kawabata S. The standardization and analysis of hand evaluation. Osaka: Textile Machinery Society of Japan; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Raccuglia M, Pistak K, Heyde C, et al. Human wetness perception of fabrics under dynamic skin contact. Text Res J. 2017;7(1):1–14. doi:doi: 10.1177/0040517517716905
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC). Absorbency of textiles. Research Triangle Park (NC): AATCC; 2014. Standard No. AATCC 79:2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ramkumar SS, Wood DJ, Fox K, et al. Developing a polymeric human finger sensor to study the frictional properties of textiles. Text Res J. 2003;73(6):469–473. doi: 10.1177/004051750307300601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W. Perceptual dimensions and evaluation of tactile textures [dissertation]. Shanghai: Dongnhua University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri D, Redortier B, Hodder S, et al. The role of decreasing contact temperatures and skin cooling in the perception of skin wetness. Neurosci Lett. 2013;551(9):65–69. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.07.015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeon E, Yoo S, Kim E. Psychophysical determination of moisture perception in high-performance shirt fabrics in relation to sweating level. Ergonomics. 2011;54(6):576–586. doi:doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.582958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar