Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Neal and Griffin's safety performance scale

References

• Wu T. A study of safe climate and safety performance of four types of manufacturing industries in Taiwan [dissertation]. Taichung City: National Changhua Normal University; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wong KW, Chan PC, Lo KK. Factors affecting the safety performance of contractors and construction sites. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference of CIB Working Commission; 1996 Mar 24–27; Honolulu (HI). Rotterdam: Balkema; 1999. p. 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu I-Y, Su T-S, Kao C-S, et al. Analysis of business safety performance by structural equation models. Saf Sci. 2012;50:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Teo EAL, Ling FYY, et al. Exploring the interactive effects of safety investments, safety culture and project hazard on safety performance: an empirical analysis. Int J Proj Manag. 2014;32:932–943. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toderi S, Gaggia A, Mariani MG, et al. Griffin and Neal’s safety model: determinants and components of individual safety performance in the Italian context. Med Lav. 2014;106:447–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman WC, Motowidlo S. Personnel selection in organizations. Ann Arbor (MI): Jossey-Bass; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91:946–953. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psych. 2000;5:347–358. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo BHW, Yiu TW, González VA. Predicting safety behavior in the construction industry: development and test of an integrative model. Saf Sci. 2016;84:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y-H. Railway safety climate: a study on organizational development. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017:1–17. doi:10.1080/10803548.2017.1361591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon CKH, Chan APC, Yam MCH. Relationships between safety climate and safety performance of building repair, maintenance, minor alteration, and addition (RMAA) works. Saf Sci. 2014;65:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Córcoles M, Gracia FJ, Tomás I, et al. Empowering team leadership and safety performance in nuclear power plants: a multilevel approach. Saf Sci. 2013;51:293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri Parkestani H, Alimohammadi I, Arghami S, et al. [Assessment of reliability and validity of a new safety culture questionnaire]. Iran Occu Health J. 2010;7:18–25. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Fang D, Wu H. Development of a safety culture interaction (SCI) model for construction projects. Saf Sci. 2013;57:138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, et al. An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res. 2001;50:300–304. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1:185–216. doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21:230–258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107:238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle J. AMOS 22. User’s guide. Chicago (IL): SmallWaters; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke S. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. Occup Health Psychol. 2006;11:315–327. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow SL, Koves GK, Barnes VE. Exploring the relationship between safety culture and safety performance in U.S. nuclear power operations. Saf Sci. 2014;69:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, et al. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94:1103–1127. doi: 10.1037/a0016172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal A, Griffin MA. Safety climate and safety at work. In: Barling J, Frone MR, editors. The psychology of workplace safety. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2004. p. 15–34.
   Google Scholar