Influence of semantic cues on hazard-inspection performance: a case in construction safety

References

• Behm M, Schneller A. Application of the Loughborough construction accident causation model: a framework for organizational learning. Constr Manage Econ. 2013;31(6):580–595. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2012.690884
   Google Scholar
• Cooke T, Lingard H. A retrospective analysis of work-related deaths in the Australian construction industry. In: Egbu C, Lou ECW, editors. Proceedings of Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) 27th Conference; 2011 Sep 5–7; Bristol, UK. Reading: Association of Researchers in Construction Management; 2011. p. 279–288.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chi S, Yang J, et al. Development of a safety inspection framework on construction sites using mobile computing. J Manage Eng. 2017;33(3):04016048. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock K. Model of safety inspection. Saf Sci. 2014;62:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz MO, Mallot HA. Biomimetic robot navigation. Rob Auton Syst. 2000;30(1–2):133–153. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00069-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan N. Working memory capacity. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2005;19(1):51–57. doi: 10.1177/0963721409359277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H-H, Boukamp F. Ontology-based representation and reasoning framework for supporting job hazard analysis. J Comput Civil Eng. 2011;25(6):442–456. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao P-C, Wang XY, Sun XL, et al. Jobsite safety management potential of navigated inspection. In: Wood A, Malott D, He J, editors. Proceedings of Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) 2016; 2016 Oct 16–21; Shenzhen. Chicago (IL): Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat; 2016. p. 1108–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Castelhano MS, Pollatsek A, Cave KR. Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008;15(4):795–801. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi S, Han S, Kim DY. Relationship between unsafe working conditions and workers’ behavior and impact of working conditions on injury severity in US construction industry. J Constr Eng Manag. 2013;139(7):826–838. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert A, Hallowell MR, Kleiner BM. Experimental field testing of a real-time construction hazard identification and transmission technique. Constr Manage Econ. 2014;32(10):1000–1016. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2014.929721
   Google Scholar
• Saha SJA. The effects of experience & interruption in predicting the error & performance rate for a construction inspection task. Neural Comput Appl. 2012;21(6):1191–1204. doi: 10.1007/s00521-010-0507-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzeng R-J, Lin C-T, Fang Y-C. Using eye-tracker to compare search patterns between experienced and novice workers for site hazard identification. Saf Sci. 2016;82:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing PE. Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychol Sci. 2000;11(6):467–473. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh YM, Chua DKH. Case-based reasoning for construction hazard identification: case representation and retrieval. J Constr Eng Manag. 2009;135(11):1181–1189. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam RA, Hide SA, Gibb AG, et al. Contributing factors in construction accidents. Appl Ergon. 2005;36(4):401–415. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DA, Jha KN. Structural equation modeling for relationship-based determinants of safety performance in construction projects. J Manage Eng. 2016;32(6):1–17. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senders JW, et al. Modelling operator cognitive interactions in nuclear power plant safety evaluation. Atomic Energy Control Board. 1985;20(3):100–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg RJ. Cognitive psychology. Toronto (ON): Nelson Education; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan N. Working memory capacity. Toronto (ON): Nelson Education; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Durso FT, Nickerson RS, Dumais ST, et al. Handbook of applied cognition. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Shah P, editors. Models of working memory: mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley AD, Hitch G. Working memory. Psychol Learn Motiv. 1974;8:47–89. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson Á, Campana G. Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010;72(1):5–18. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto D, Hodsoll J, Rotshtein P, et al. Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12(9):342–348. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci. 2001;24(1):87–114. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01003922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg RJ, Sternberg K. Cognitive psychology. Toronto (ON): Nelson Education; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens CD. Engineering psychology and human performance. New York (NY): Pearson; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn YW, Doane SM. Memory processes of flight situation awareness: interactive roles of working memory capacity, long-term working memory, and expertise. Hum Factors. 2004;46(3):461–475. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.3.461.50392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelhano MS, Heaven C. The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010;72(5):1283–1297. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Duran DM, Guillermo MA. Assessing the cost forecasting performance in construction projects through data envelopment analysis. In: Molinabas OI, editor. Proceedings Construction Research Congress 2016; 2016 May 31–Jun 2; San Juan, Puerto Rico. San Juan: University of Puerto Rico; 2016. p. 2039–2049.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. Acta Psychol. 2011;137(2):217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SW, Kim MS. Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but it's under control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009;35(5):682–693. doi: 10.1037/a0016452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantopoulos P, Chapman P, Crundall D. Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers’ eye movements in day, night and rain driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(3):827–834. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elisa RN, Balaguer-Ballester E, Parris BA. Inattention, working memory, and goal neglect in a community sample. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe JM. Guided search 2.0 a revised model of visual search. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994;1(2):202–238. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeelani I, Albert A, Gambatese JA. Why do construction hazards remain unrecognized at the work interface? J Constr Eng Manag. 2017;143(5):04016128. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibnezhad M, et al. The relationship between construction workers’ risk perception and eye movement in hazard identification. In: Molinabas OI, editor. Proceedings of Construction Research Congress 2016; 2016 May 31–Jun 2; San Juan, Puerto Rico. San Juan: University of Puerto Rico; 2016. p. 2984–2994.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh S, Dao B, Esmaeili B, et al. Measuring the impact of working memory load on the safety performance of construction workers. In: Ken-Yu Lin K-Y, Nora E-G, Tang P, editors. Proceedings of ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering 2017; 2017 Jun 25–27; Seattle (WA). Reston (VA): American Society of Civil Engineers; 2017. p. 158–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh S, Esmaeili B, Dodd MD. Impact of construction workers hazard identification skills on their visual attention. J Constr Eng Manag. 2017;143(10):1–16. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Kintsch W. Long-term working memory. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(2):211–245. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak KJ. Symbolic connectionism: toward third-generation theories of expertise. In: KA Ericsson, J Smith, editors. Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 1991. p. 301–335.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS, et al. Handbook of applied cognition. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bhoir SA, Hasanzadeh S, Esmaeili B, et al. Measuring construction workers’ attention using eye-tracking technology. In: Froese TM, Newton L, Sadeghpour F, Vanier DJ, editors. Proceedings of 5th International Construction Specialty Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering; 2015 Jun 8–10; Vancouver, BC. Montreal (QC): Canadian Society for Civil Engineering; 2015. p. 222: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chi S. Real-time information support for strategic safety inspection on construction sites. In: Ferrier J-L, Gusikhin O, Madani K, et al., editors. Proceedings of 30th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining; 2013 Aug 11–15; Montreal, QC. Setúbal: SCITEPRESS; 2013. p. 506–513.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh S, Esmaeili B, Dodd MD. Measuring the impacts of safety knowledge on construction workers’ attentional allocation and hazard detection using remote eye-tracking technology. J Manage Eng. 2017;33(5):1–17. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann MAZN. Deaths and injuries involving elevators and escalators. Washington (DC): The Center to Protect Workers’ Rights (CPWR); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Khaji A, Ghodsi SM. Trend of elevator-related accidents in Tehran. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2014;2(2):117–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim HJ, Na JY. What happened to him using the freight elevator: fall from height or caught between? Korean J Legal Med. 2013;37(3):153–156. doi: 10.7580/kjlm.2013.37.3.153
   Google Scholar
• Liao P-C, Guo Z, Tsai CH, et al. Spatial–temporal interrelationships of safety risks with dynamic partition analysis: a mechanical installation case. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2017;8(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadpour A, Asadi S, Karan E. Determining the role of attentional control among construction workers in improving safety performance. In: Molinabas OI, editor. Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress; 2016 May 31–Jun 2; San Juan, Puerto Rico. San Juan: University of Puerto Rico; 2016. p. 2793–2800.
   Google Scholar
• Poole A, Ball LJ. Eye tracking in human–computer interaction and usability research: current status and future prospects. In: Ghaoui C, editor. Encyclopedia of human computer interaction. Hershey (PA): Idea Group Reference; 2006. p. 211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi MV. Implementing eye tracking technology in the construction process. In: Sulbaran T, editor. 51st ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings; 2015 Apr 22–24; College Station, Texas. Fort Collins (CO): Associated School of Construction; 2015. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Cho YK. Effectiveness analysis from a cognitive perspective for a real-time safety assistance system for mobile crane lifting operations. J Constr Eng Manag. 2017;143(4):05016025. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Sun Q, Psychology SO, et al. Effects of visuo-spatial working memory loads on the real-world scene search performance. Acta Psychol. 2014;46(11):1613–1627.
   Google Scholar
• Pan B, Hembrooke HA, Gay GK, et al. The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study. In: Morimoto C, Istance H, editors. Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications; 2004 Mar 22–24; San Antonio, Texas. New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery (ACM); 2004. p. 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Nyström M, Holmqvist K. An adaptive algorithm for fixation, saccade, and glissade detection in eyetracking data. Behav Res Methods. 2010;42(1):188–204. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fracasso A, Caramazza A, Melcher D. Continuous perception of motion and shape across saccadic eye movements. J Vis. 2010;10(13):14. doi: 10.1167/10.13.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SD, Carter G. Safety hazard identification on construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 2006;132(2):197–205. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:2(197)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K, Nyström M, Andersson R, et al. Eye tracking: a comprehensive guide to methods and measures. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chan AHS, Chan CY. Validating the random search model for a double-target search task. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2000;1(2):157–167. doi: 10.1080/14639220050171315
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi F, Riva F, Colombo E. Dealing with small sets of laboratory test replicates for improved cooking stoves (ICSs): insights for a robust statistical analysis of results. Biomass Bioenerg. 2018;115:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahn S. Workplace hazard identification and management: the case of an underground mining operation. Saf Sci. 2013;57(8):129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauland G. Measuring individual and team situation awareness during planning tasks in training of en route air traffic control. Int J Aviat Psychol. 2008;18(3):290–304. doi: 10.1080/10508410802168333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar