Predicting the probability of occupational fall incidents: a Bayesian network model for the oil industry

References

• International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (IOGP). Safety performance indicators – 2017 data. London: IOGP; 2018. (Report No. 2017s).
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2016. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Labor; 2017. (Report No. USDL-17-1667).
   Google Scholar
• Mason KL, Retzer KD, Hill R, et al. Occupational fatalities resulting from falls in the oil and gas extraction industry, United States, 2005–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(16):417–421. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6616a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong XS, Largay JA, Choi SD, et al. Fatal falls and PFAS use in the construction industry: findings from the NIOSH FACE reports. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;102:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Castrillo JA, Trillo-Cabello AF, Rubio-Romero JC. Construction accidents: identification of the main associations between causes, mechanisms and stages of the construction process. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017;23(2):240–250. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1245507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadhim E, Hon C, Xia B, et al. Falls from height in the construction industry: a critical review of the scientific literature. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2016;13(7):638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talat Birgonul M, Dikmen I, Budayan C, et al. An expert system for the quantification of fault rates in construction fall accidents. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):20–31. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1123516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu K, Rahmandad H, Smith-Jackson T, et al. Factors influencing the risk of falls in the construction industry: a review of the evidence. Constr Manag Econ. 2011;29(4):397–416. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2011.558104
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen LD, Tran DQ, Chandrawinata MP. Predicting safety risk of working at heights using Bayesian networks. J Constr Eng Manag. 2016;142(9):04016041–04016041. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen FV, Nielsen TD. Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Vol. 44. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag New York; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzaei Aliabadi M, Aghaei H, Kalatpour O, et al. Analysis of human and organizational factors that influence mining accidents based on Bayesian network. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018: 1–8. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1455411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Herrero S, Mariscal MA, García-Rodríguez J, et al. Working conditions, psychological/physical symptoms and occupational accidents. Bayesian network models. Saf Sci. 2012;50(9):1760–1774. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):768–770. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentz K, Ferson S. Combination of evidence in Dempster–Shafer theory. Albuquerque (NM): Sandia National Laboratories; 2002. (Report No. SAND2002-0835).
   Google Scholar
• Cox SJ, Cheyne AJT. Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):111–129. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kines P, Lappalainen J, Mikkelsen KL, et al. Nordic safety climate questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): a new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. Int J Ind Ergon. 2011;41(6):634–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns K, Flin R, Gordon R, et al. Human and organizational factors in offshore safety. Work Stress. 2001;15(2):144–160. doi: 10.1080/026783701102678370110066616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadfam I, Ghasemi F, Kalatpour O, et al. Constructing a Bayesian network model for improving safety behavior of employees at workplaces. Appl Ergon. 2017;58:35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell JJ, Jr., McLaney MA. Exposure to job stress – a new psychometric instrument. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1988;14(Suppl 1(1)):27–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuan CL, Penyelidikan J. Sample size estimation using Krejcie and Morgan and Cohen statistical power analysis: a comparison. J Penyelidikan IPBL. 2006;7(1):78–86.
   Google Scholar
• Do CB, Batzoglou S. What is the expectation maximization algorithm? Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(8):897–899. doi: 10.1038/nbt1406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcot BG. Metrics for evaluating performance and uncertainty of Bayesian network models. Ecol Model. 2012;230:50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood D, Khan F, Veitch B. Can we predict occupational accident frequency? Process Saf Environ Prot. 2006;84(3):208–221. doi: 10.1205/psep.05113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baksh A-A, Khan F, Gadag V, et al. Network based approach for predictive accident modelling. Saf Sci. 2015;80:274–287. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry TS. Modern accident investigation and analysis. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ale BJM, Baksteen H, Bellamy LJ, et al. Quantifying occupational risk: the development of an occupational risk model. Saf Sci. 2008;46(2):176–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujath MF, Amyotte PR, Khan FI. A conceptual offshore oil and gas process accident model. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2010;23(2):323–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathnayaka S, Khan F, Amyotte P. SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: methodology and model description. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2011;89(3):151–164. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song G, Khan F, Wang H, et al. Dynamic occupational risk model for offshore operations in harsh environments. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2016;150:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantley LF, Galusha D, Cullen MR, et al. Association between ambient noise exposure, hearing acuity, and risk of acute occupational injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41(1):75–83. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neitzel RL, Long RN, Sun K, et al. Injury risk and noise exposure in firefighter training operations. Ann Occup Hygiene. 2016;60(4):405–420. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev088
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoon J-H, Hong J-S, Roh J, et al. Dose–response relationship between noise exposure and the risk of occupational injury. Noise Health. 2015;17(74):43–47. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.149578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnes JA, Akram M, Macfarlane EM, et al. Association between high ambient temperature and acute work-related injury: a case-crossover analysis using workers’ compensation claims data. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017;43(1):86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng R, Li C, Wang Q, et al. Does hot weather affect work-related injury? A case-crossover study in Guangzhou, China. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221:423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Polachek T. Discourse-based intervention for modifying supervisory communication as leverage for safety climate and performance improvement: a randomized field study. J Appl Psychol. 2014;99(1):113–124. doi: 10.1037/a0034096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia N, Zou PXW, Liu X, et al. A hybrid BN-HFACS model for predicting safety performance in construction projects. Saf Sci. 2018;101:332–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Fang D, Wang X. A method to identify strategies for the improvement of human safety behavior by considering safety climate and personal experience. Saf Sci. 2008;46(10):1406–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst TM, Brubaker TL, Barsotti A. Organizational injury rate underreporting: the moderating effect of organizational safety climate. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(5):1147–1154. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne SC, Bergman ME, Beus JM, et al. Safety climate: leading or lagging indicator of safety outcomes? J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2009;22(6):735–739. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D. Thirty years of safety climate research: reflections and future directions. Accident Anal Prev. 2010;42(5):1517–1522. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad R, Ching CL, Bandar NFA, et al. Relationship between safety climate factors and safety performance among the workers in cold storage industries. Am J Trade Policy. 2018;5(1):7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Huang Y-h, Lee J, et al. A mediation model linking dispatcher leadership and work ownership with safety climate as predictors of truck driver safety performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;62:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar