Development and psychometric properties of the Polish basic version of the SDM questionnaire for measuring bullying

References

• Cooper CL, Payne R. Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work. Chichester: Wiley; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• House JS. Work stress and social support. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24:285–308. doi: 10.2307/2392498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work WP. Unemployment and mental health. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens CD. Engineering psychology and human performance. New York (NY): HarperCollins; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin I, Clark J. Technological change at work. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Payne RL. Demands, support, constraints and psychological health. In: Mackay C, Cox T, editors. Response to stress: occupational aspects. London (UK): IPC Business Press; 1979. p. 85–105.
   Google Scholar
• Theorell T, Karasek RA. Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1(1):9–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York (NY): Springer; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky C. Harassed worker. Lexington (MA): Lexington Books; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Leymann H. Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence Vict. 1990;5:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.5.2.119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. The concept of bullying at work. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. editors. Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: international perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis; 2003. p. 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: international perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Salin D, Cowan RL, Adewumi O, et al. Workplace bullying across the globe: a cross-cultural comparison. Personnel Rev. 2019;48(1):204–219. doi: 10.1108/PR-03-2017-0092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Notelaers G, Einarsen S. Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL, editors. Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: international perspectives in research and practice. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2011. p. 149–174.
   Google Scholar
• Keashly L, Harvey S. Emotional abuse in the workplace. In: Fox S, Spector PE, editors. Counterproductive work behavior: investigations of actors and targets. Washington (DC): APA; 2005. p. 201–235.
   Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Specyfika i konsekwencje mobbingu jako procesu obniżającego efektywność wykonania pracy zawodowej [Mobbing as a process lowering employees efficacy]. In: Juliszewski T, Ogińska H, Złowodzki M, editors. Obciążenia psychiczne pracą – nowe wyzwania dla ergonomii [Mental workload – new challenges for ergonomics]. Kraków: Komitet ergonomii PAN; 2011. p. 227–246. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Mobbing w miejscu pracy: zarys tradycji badawczej, podstawowe założenia, metodologia i wybrane wyniki badań własnych [Mobbing in the workplace: the research tradition, basic assumptions, methodology and selected studies results]. Prace Psychologiczne LXII, Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. 2013;3546:175–189. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Organizational and socio-organizational mobbing antecedents. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. 2015;16(3):25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Durniat K, Miguel Ángel Mañas Rodríguez. The experience and acceptance of mobbing and negative workplace behaviours in Poland and Spain – comparative study results. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. 2017;18(7):5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Mobbing jako patologia społeczna [Mobbing as a social pathology]. In: Klebaniuk, J. editor. Człowiek wobec masowych zjawisk społecznych [Man in the face of mass social phenomena]. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT; 2006. p. 425–437. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Mobbing dynamics and consequences. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. 2015;16(3):269–283.
   Google Scholar
• Hirigoyen MF. Malise dans le travail: Harcèlement moral, démêler le vrai du faux [Workplace pathologies: moral harassment, revelling the truth]. Paris: Syros; 2001. French.
   Google Scholar
• Kulczycka A, Durniat K. Metodologiczne problemy badania mobbingu [Methodological problems of researching workplace bullying]. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej. 2004;1032:640–650. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Durniat K, Kulczycka A. Operacjonalizacja mobbingu w kontekście badań międzykulturowych. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej [Operationalisation of bullying in view of international research]. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej. 2006;1132:458–467. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Notelaers G, Einarsen S. The world turns at 33 and 45: defining simple cutoff scores for the negative acts questionnaire-revised in a representative sample. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2013;22(6):670–682. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.690558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einarsen S, Skogstad A. Bullying at work: epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1996;5:185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414854
   Google Scholar
• O’Moore M, Lynch J, Nic Daeid, N. The rates and relative risks of workplace bullying in Ireland, a country of high economic growth. Int J Manag Decision Making. 2003;4(1):82–95. doi: 10.1504/IJMDM.2003.002490
   Google Scholar
• Lewis D. Workplace bullying – interim findings of a study in further and higher education in Wales. Int J Manpower. 1999;20(1/2):106–119. doi: 10.1108/01437729910268696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner C. The incidence of workplace bullying. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 1997;7:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199706)7:3<199::AID-CASP418>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenas A, Giorgi G, Montani F, et al. Workplace bullying in a sample of Italian and Spanish employees and its relationship with job satisfaction and psychological well-being. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1912. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurofound. Fifth European working conditions survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012. Available from: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1182en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leymann H. Handbok för användning av LIPT-formuläret för kartläggning av risker för psykiskt våld [Manual of the LIPT – questionnaire for assessing the risk of psychological workplace violence]. Stockholm: Violen; 1990. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Einarsen S, Raknes B. Mobbing i arbeidslivet [Bullying in working life]. Bergen: Institutt for samfunnspsykologi, Universitetet i Bergen; 1991. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Einarsen S, Raknes B. Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence Vict. 1997;12:247–263. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.12.3.247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Einarsen S, Hoel H, Notelaers G. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the negative acts questionnaire – revised. Work Stress. 2009;23(1):24–44. doi: 10.1080/02678370902815673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey S, Keashly L. Predicting the risk for aggression in the workplace: risk factors, self-esteem and time at work. Soc Behav Personality. 2003;31(8):807–814. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2003.31.8.807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie H, Naylor P, Rivers I, et al. Measuring workplace bullying. Aggress Violent Behav. 2002;7:33–51. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen EG, Einarsen S. Bullying in Danish worklife: prevalence and health correlates. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2001;10:393–413. doi: 10.1080/13594320143000816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salin D. Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: a comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2001;10(4):425–441. doi: 10.1080/13594320143000771
   Google Scholar
• Zapf D, Knorz C, Kulla M. On the relationship between mobbing factors and job content, social work environment and health outcomes. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1996;5(2):215–237. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414856
   Google Scholar
• Zapf D, Escartin J, Einarsen S, et al. Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. editors. Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: international perspectives in research and practice. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2011. p. 75–105.
   Google Scholar
• Solberg ME, Olweus D. Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggress Behav. 2003;29:239–268. doi: 10.1002/ab.10047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leymann H. The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1996;5:165–184. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414853
   Google Scholar
• Vartia M. The sources of bullying – psychological work environment and organizational climate. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1996;5(2):203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414855
   Google Scholar
• Agervold M. Bullying at work: a discussion of definitions and prevalence, based on an empirical study. Scand J Psychol. 2007;48:161–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00585.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notelaers G, Einarsen S, De Witte H, et al. Measuring exposure to bullying at work: the validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach. Work Stress. 2006;20(4):289–302. doi: 10.1080/02678370601071594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Społeczno-organizacyjne uwarunkowania mobbingu [Socio-organizational bullying antecedents] [dissertation]. Wrocław: the University of Wrocław; 2008. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Measuring and diagnosing mobbing phenomenon – beyond behavioural indicators. Paper presented at: Respectful and effective leadership – managing people and organizations in turbulent times. 17th EAWOP Congress; 2015 May 20–23; Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Merecz D, Mościcka A, Drabek M. Mobbing w środowisku pracy. Charakterystyka zjawiska, jego konsekwencje, aspekty prawne i sposoby przeciwdziałania [Workplace bullying. Characteristics, consequences, legal aspects and methods of counteracting]. Łódź: IMP; 2005. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Kmiecik-Baran K, Rybicki J. Mobbing – zagrożenie współczesnego miejsca pracy [Bullying – the threat of contemporary workplace]. Gdańsk: Pomorski Instytut Demokratyczny; 2003. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Delikowska K. Raport z badań na temat działań mobbingowych w miejscu pracy [Report on workplace bullying research]. Warszawa: Wspólnota Robocza Związków Organizacji Socjalnych (Wrzos). 2003. (Społecznik; 7). Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Ustawa z 14 listopada 2003 r. o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks pracy oraz o zmianie niektórych innych ustaw [Journal of Legal Acts, 14th of November, 2003, Labour Code and some other acts]. Dziennik Ustaw. 2003;(213):item 2081. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Kodeks Pracy, tekst ujednolicony, nowelizacja z 1 maja 2004 r (art. 943, § 2), wydanie uzupełnione tekstem ustawy na 14 listopada 2003 roku, Dz.U., nr 213, poz. 2081 ze zm. [Labour Code, amendment of the 1st of May 2004 (art. 943, § 2), edition supplemented with the text of the Act of 14th of November, 2003, as cited in: Journal of Legal Acts, 2003;(213):item 2081]. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Spector PE, Jex SM. Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:356–367. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warszewska-Makuch M. Polska adaptacja kwestionariusza NAQ do pomiaru mobbingu [Polish adaptation of the NAQ for measuring workplace bullying]. Bezp Pracy – Nauka i Praktyka. 2007;(12):16–19. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Baka Ł, Bazińska R. Polish adaptation of three self-report measures of job stressors: the Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, the Quantitative Workload Inventory and the Organizational Constraints Scale. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):32–39. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1116816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Doświadczanie mobbingu i negatywnych emocji w pracy – analiza porównawcza: Polska – Hiszpania [Experiencing bullying and negative emotions at work – comparative analysis: Poland – Spain]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. 2018;512:36–47. Polish. doi: 10.15611/pn.2018.512.03
   Google Scholar
• Nettelbladt P, Hansson L, Stefansson CG, et al. Test characteristics of the Hopkins Symptom Check List-25 (HSCL-25) in Sweden, using the Present State Examination (PSE-9) as a caseness criterion. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1993;28:130–133. doi: 10.1007/BF00801743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durniat K. Polish adaptation of L. Rosenstiel and R. Boegel’s organizational climate diagnosis questionnaire. Polish J Appl Psychol. 2012;10(1):147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Warszewska-Makuch M. Ocena ryzyka mobbing w miejscu pracy [Risk assessment of workplace bullying]. Bezp Pracy – Nauka i Praktyka. 2012;(5):8–19. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Brzeziński J. Etapy konstruowania kwestionariusza osobowości [Stages of the personality test construction]. In: Sanocki W, editor. Kwestionariusze osobowości w psychologii. Warszawa: PWN; 1976. p. 269–312. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasi A, Urbina S. Testy psychologiczne [Psychological tests]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów psychologicznych PTP; 1999. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Hornowska E. Testy psychologiczne. Teoria i praktyka [Psychological tests. Theory and practice]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar; 2001. Polish.
   Google Scholar