Multicriteria ranking of the influential factors of safety as criteria for development of the occupational safety and health climate

References

• Milijić N, Mihajlović I, Štrbac N, et al. Developing a questionnaire for measuring safety climate in the workplace in Serbia. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(4):631–645. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2013.11077020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanović V. Uticaj uslova radne sredine za zadovoljstvo zaposlenih u tekstilnoj industriji [Influence of working environment conditions for satisfaction of employees in the textile industry]. Tekstilna industrija. 2018;66(1):55–63. Serbian. Available from: https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0040-23891801055S
   Google Scholar
• Krstić I, Krstić D, Kusalo A. Analiza pokazatelja za procenu profesionalnog rizika [Analysis of indicators for the assessment of professional risk]. Eng Protection. 2011;1(1):45–58. Serbian. doi: 10.7562/SE2011.1.01.08s
   Google Scholar
• Logasakthi K, Rajagopal K. A study of employee health, safety and welfare measures of chemical industry in the view of Salem region. Int J Res Bus Manag. 2013;1(1):1–10. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/12440460
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanović D, Stanković V, Urošević S, et al. Multicriteria ranking of workplaces regarding working conditions in a mining company. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(4):479–486. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1165506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urošević S, Radosavljević D, Stefanović V, et al. Multicriteria ranking of a job positions by ELECTRA methods in order to improve the analysis and conditions at work in companies textile industry. Industria Textil. 2017;68(5):388–395. Available from: http://www.revistaindustriatextila.ro/images/Textila_nr_5_2017r.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urošević S, Stefanović V, Đorđević D. Analysis of the working conditions with consideration-hazard potential health and safety of employees in textile industry. In: Indrie L, editor. Proceedings of International Scientific Conference on Innovative Solutions for Sustainable Development of Textiles and Leather Industry; 2016 May 27–28; Oradea: University of Oradea; 2016. p. 171–172.
   Google Scholar
• Litwin GH, Stringer RA. Motivation and organizational climate. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Tagiuri R, Litwin G. Organizational climate: explorations of a concept. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Denison DR. What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21(3):619–654. doi: 10.5465/amr.1996.9702100310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furham A, Goodstein LD. The organizational climate questionnaire (OCQ). Pfeiffer JW, editor. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1997. Available from: http://homepages.se.edu/cvonbergen/files/2013/01/The-Organizational-Climate-Questionnaire.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glisson C, James LR. The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(6):767–794. doi: 10.1002/job.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glendon AI, Stanton NA. Perspectives on safety culture. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):193–214. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Fang D, Wang X. A method to identify strategies for the improvement of human safety behavior by considering safety climate and personal experience. Saf Sci. 2008;46(10):1406–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper MD, Phillips RA. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behaviour relationship. J Safety Res. 2004;35(5):497–512. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharaldsen JE, Olsen E, Rundmo T. A longitudinal study of safety climate on the Norwegian continental shelf. Saf Sci. 2008;46(3):427–439. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox S, Flin R. Safety culture: philosopher's stone or man of straw? Work Stress. 1998;12(3):189–201. doi: 10.1080/02678379808256861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns K, Flin R. Assessing the state of organization safety – culture or climate? Curr Psychol. 1999;18(1):5–17. Available from: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12144-999-1013-3.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):215–257. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmer B. Industrial psychology. New York (NY): Mc-Graw-Hill; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organisations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65(1):96–102. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D. A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85:587–596. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587
   Google Scholar
• Zohar D. Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: a leadership-based intervention model. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(1):156–163. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G. A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(4):616–628. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy LA, Robertson MM, Carayon P. The next generation of macroergonomics: integrating safety climate. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;68:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1–3):99–109. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D. Safety climate and beyond: a multi-level multi-climate framework. Saf Sci. 2008;46(3):376–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, et al. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(5):1103–1127. doi: 10.1037/a0021484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beus JM, Payne SC, Bergman ME, et al. Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95:713–727. doi: 10.1037/a0019164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D. Thirty years of safety climate research: reflections and future directions. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(5):1517–1522. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96:71–94. doi: 10.1037/a0021484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Eid L, Hystad SW, et al. A brief safety climate inventory for petro-maritime organizations. Saf Sci. 2013;58:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kines P, Lappalainen J, Lyngby Mikkelsen K, et al. Nordic safety climate questionnaire (NOSACQ50): a new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. Int J Ind Ergon. 2011;41:634–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajković J, Lj M. Uticaj elemenata bezbednosti na radu na ostvarenju projektnih ciljeva [Impact of elements of safety at work on the realization of project goals]. Tehnika – kvalitet IMS, standardizacija i metodologija. 2017;17(5):757–764. Serbian. doi: 10.5937/tehnika1705757R
   Google Scholar
• Službeni Glasnik Republike Srbije 101/2005, 91/2015 and 113/2017. Zakon o bezbednosti na radu i zaštiti zdravlja [The law on safety and health at work]. Belgrade: Government of Serbia; 2017; [cited 2017 Jan 23]. Serbian. Available from: https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_bezbednosti_i_zdravlju_na_radu.html
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadfam I, Kamalinia M, Momeni M, et al. Developing an integrated decision making approach to assess and promote the effectiveness of occupational health and safety management systems. J Clean Prod. 2016;127:119–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadfam I, Kamalinia M, Momeni M, et al. Evaluation of the quality of occupational health and safety management systems based on key performance indicators in certified organizations. Saf Health Work. 2017;8(2):156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(3):347–358. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yule S, Flin R, Murdy A. The role of management and safety climate in preventing risk-taking at work. Int J Risk Assess Manag. 2007;7(2):137–151. doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011727
   Google Scholar
• Ali H, Abdullah ACN, Subramaniam C. Management practice in safety culture and its influence on workplace injury: an industrial study in Malaysia. Disast Prev Manag Int J. 2009;18(5):470–477. doi: 10.1108/09653560911003660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basha SA, Maiti J. Relationships of demographic factors, job risk perception and work injury in a steel plant in India. Saf Sci. 2013;51(1):374–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam C, Fung I, Chan A. Study of attitude changes in people after the implementation of a new safety management system: the supervision plan. J Construct Eng Manag. 2001;19(4):393–403. doi: 10.1080/01446190010027591
   Google Scholar
• Fang D, Chen Y, Wong L. Safety climate in construction industry: a case study in Hong Kong. J Construct Eng Manag. 2006;132(6):573–584. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:6(573)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arezes PM, Miguel AS. Risk perception and safety behaviour: a study in an occupational environment. Saf Sci. 2008;46(6):900–907. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høivik D, Tharaldsen JE, Baste V, et al. What is most important for safety climate: the company belonging or the local working environment? – A study from the Norwegian offshore industry. Saf Sci. 2009;47(10):1324–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y-H, Zohar D, Robertson MM, et al. Development and validation of safety climate scales for lone workers using truck drivers as exemplar. Trans Res F Traffic Psychol Behavior. 2013;17:5–19. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns K, Kirwan B, Reader TW, et al. Development of a methodology for understanding and enhancing safety culture in air traffic management. Saf Sci. 2013;53(0):123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SH, Tang WJ, Miao JY, et al. Safety climate measurement at workplace in China: a validity and reliability assessment. Saf Sci. 2008;46(7):1037–1046. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janackovic GL, Savic SM, Stankovic MS. Selection and ranking of occupational safety indicators based on fuzzy AHP: a case study in road construction companies. S Afr J Ind Eng. 2013;24(3): online version. Available from: http://sajie.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janackovic G, Savic S, Stankovic M. Multi-criteria decision analysis in occupational safety management systems. Saf Eng. 2011;1(1):17–22. doi: 10.7562/SE2011.1.01.04
   Google Scholar
• Keršulienė V, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). J Bus Econ Manag. 2010;11(2):243–258. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2010.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemkhani Zolfani S, Maknoon R, Zavadskas EK. Multiple Nash equilibriums and evaluation of strategies; new application of MCDM methods. J Bus Econ Manag. 2015;16(2):290–306. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2014.967715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanujkic D, Karabasevic D, Zavadskas EK. A framework for the selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method. Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics. 2015;26(2):181–187. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1350.9603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas EK, Stević Ž, Tanackov I, et al. A novel multicriteria approach – rough step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis method (R-SWARA) and its application in logistics. Inf Control. 2018;27(1):97–106. doi: 10.24846/v27i1y201810
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 1965;8(3):338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Sizong G, Tao S. Interval-valued fuzzy number and its expression based on structured element. Fuzzy Inf Eng. 2009;2:1417–1425. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03664-4_150
   Google Scholar
• Vahdani B, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Mousavi SM, et al. Soft computing based on new interval-valued fuzzy modified multi-criteria decision-making method. Appl Soft Comput. 2013;13(1):165–172. doi: 10.3233/IFS-120748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żywica P, Stachowiak A, Wygralak M. An algorithmic study of relative cardinalities for interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2016;294:105–124. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986;20(1):87–96. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan S. A unified representation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, hesitant fuzzy sets and generalized hesitant fuzzy sets based on their u-maps. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;69:257–276. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayagam VLG, Jeevaraj S, Sivaraman G. Complete ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Inf Eng. 2016;8(2):237–254. doi: 10.1016/j.fiae.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen H. A new interval-valued knowledge measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application in decision making. Expert Syst Appl. 2016;56:143–155. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wang JQ, Zhang HY, et al. Multi-criteria decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: an outranking approach. Knowl Based Syst. 2015;86:224–236. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak Z. Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci. 1982;11(5):341–356. doi: 10.1007/BF01001956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo LP, Zhai LY. A prototype genetic algorithm-enhanced rough set-based rule induction system. Comput Ind. 2001;46(1):95–106. doi: 10.1016/S0166-3615(01)00117-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiY TJ, Luo X, et al. An integrated method of rough set, Kano’s model and AHP for rating customer requirements’ final importance. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36(3):7045–7053. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song W, Ming X, Wu Z. An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. J Eng Des. 2013;24(5):320–341. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2012.732994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu GN, Hu J, Qi J, et al. An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number. Adv Eng Inform. 2015;29:408–418. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari V, Jain PK, Tandon P. Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method. Adv Eng Inform. 2016;30:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badi I, Ballem M. Supplier selection using rough BWM-MAIRCA model: a case study in pharmaceutical supplying in Libya. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng. 2018;1(2):16–33. doi: 10.31181/dmame1802016b
   Google Scholar
• Karavidić Z, Projović D. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model in the security forces operations based on rough sets. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng. 2018;1(1):97–120. doi: 10.31181/dmame180197k
   Google Scholar
• Vasiljević M, Fazlollahtabar H, Stević Ž, et al. A rough multicriteria approach for evaluation of supplier criteria in automotive industry. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng. 2018;1(1):82–96. doi: 10.31181/dmame180182v
   Google Scholar
• Düntsch I, Gediga G. Uncertainty measures of rough set prediction. Artifintell. 1998;106(1):109–137. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00091-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak Z. Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Boston (MA): Kluwer; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak Z. Anatomy of conflicts. Bull Eur Assoc Theor Comput Sci. 1993;50:234–247.
   Google Scholar
• Stević Ž, Pamučar D, Kazimieras Zavadskas E, et al. The selection of wagons for the internal transport of a logistics company: a novel approach based on rough BWM and rough SAW methods. Symmetry. 2017;9(11):264. doi: 10.3390/sym9110264
   Google Scholar
• Stojić G, Stević Ž, Antuchevičienė J, et al. A novel rough WASPAS approach for supplier selection in a company manufacturing PVC carpentry products. Information. 2018;9(5):121. doi: 10.3390/info9050121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamučar D, Stević Ž, Sremac S. A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in mcdm models: full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry. 2018;10(9):393. doi: 10.3390/sym10090393
   Google Scholar
• Prentkovskis O, Erceg Ž, Stević Ž, et al. A new methodology for improving service quality measurement: Delphi-FUCOM-SERVQUAL model. Symmetry. 2018;10(12):757. doi: 10.3390/sym10120757
   Google Scholar
• Nunić Z. Evaluation and selection of manufacturer PVC carpentry using FUCOM-MABAC model. Oper Res Eng Sci Theor Appl. 2019;1(1):13–28. doi: 10.31181/oresta19012010113n
   Google Scholar
• Erceg Ž, Mularifović F. Integrated MCDM model for processes optimization in the supply chain management in the wood company. Oper Res Eng Sci Theor Appl. 2019;2(1):37–50. doi: 10.31181/oresta1901015e
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas EK, Nunić Z, Stjepanović Ž, et al. A novel rough range of value method (R-ROV) for selecting automatically guided vehicles (AGVs). Inf Control. 2018;27(4):385–394. doi: 10.24846/v27i4y201802
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y-H, Lee J, McFadden CA, et al. Individual employee’s perceptions of ‘group-level safety climate’ (supervisor referenced) versus ‘organization-level safety climate’ (top management referenced): associations with safety outcomes for lone workers. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;98:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dağdeviren M, Yüksel I. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Inf Sci. 2008;178(6):1717–1733. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns K, Rundmo T, Flin R, et al. Evaluation of psychosocial and organizational factors in offshore safety: a comparative study. J Risk Res. 2004;7(5):545–561. doi: 10.1080/1366987042000146193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar