Is ‘invisible gorilla’ self-reportedly measurable? Development and validation of a new questionnaire for measuring cognitive unsafe behaviors of front-line industrial workers

References

• Zhou Y, Ding L, Wang X, et al. Applicability of 4D modeling for resource allocation in mega liquefied natural gas plant construction. Autom Constr. 2015;50:50–63. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Luo H, Yang Y. Implementation of augmented reality for segment displacement inspection during tunneling construction. Autom Constr. 2017;82:112–121. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen P, Takala J, Kiat TB. Global estimates of occupational accidents and work-related illnesses. Paper presented at: World Congress on Safety and Health at Work; 2017 Sep 3–4; Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• McSween TE. Values-based safety process: improving your safety culture with behavior-based safety. 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): Wiley; 2003. Chapter 21; Advanced topics: why it works and behavioral basics; p. 194–196.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Song X, Lin Z. Revealing the ‘Invisible Gorilla’ in construction: estimating construction safety through mental workload assessment. Autom Constr. 2016;63:173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou PX, Sunindijo RY. Skills for managing safety risk, implementing safety task, and developing positive safety climate in construction project. Autom Constr. 2013;34:92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze J, Hallowell M, Baud K. Construction-safety best practices and relationships to safety performance. J Constr Eng Manag. 2013;139(10):04013006. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlöf H, Wiitavaara B, Winblad U, et al. Safety culture and reasons for risk-taking at a large steel-manufacturing company: investigating the worker perspective. Saf Sci. 2015;73:126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andolfo C, Sadeghpour F. A probabilistic accident prediction model for construction sites. Procedia Eng. 2015;123:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.052
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadfam I, Ghasemi F, Kalatpour O, et al. Constructing a Bayesian network model for improving safety behavior of employees at workplaces. Appl Ergon. 2017;58:35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich HW. Industrial accident prevention; a scientific approach. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1941.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhry RM. Behavior-based safety on construction sites: a case study. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;70:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakerian M, Jahangiri M, Alimohammadlou M, et al. Individual cognitive factors affecting unsafe acts among Iranian industrial workers: an integrative meta-synthesis interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Saf Sci. 2019;120:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J. Human errors. A taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. J Occup Accid. 1982;4(2–4):311–333. doi: 10.1016/0376-6349(82)90041-4
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. The phenotype of erroneous actions. Int J Man Mach Stud. 1993;39(1):1–32. doi: 10.1006/imms.1993.1051
   Google Scholar
• Endsley MR. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):65–84. doi: 10.1518/001872095779049499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills B, Reyna VF, Estrada S. Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(5):429–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02104.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive. Reducing error and influencing behaviour. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pUbns/priced/hsg48.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Gupta S, Agarwal M, et al. Categorization and standardization of accidental risk-criticality levels of human error to develop risk and safety management policy. Saf Sci. 2016;85:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian J-Y, Miller GE, Shah S, editors. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12(2):257–285. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newnam S, Tay R, Mason C. Using psychological frameworks to inform the evaluation of fleet safety initiatives. Saf Sci. 2006;44(9):809–820. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Li H, Wang H, et al. Evaluating the impact of mental fatigue on construction equipment operators’ ability to detect hazards using wearable eye-tracking technology. Autom Constr. 2019;105:102835. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens CD. Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors. 2008;50(3):449–455. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoboubi N, Choobineh A, Ghanavati FK, et al. The impact of job stress and job satisfaction on workforce productivity in an Iranian petrochemical industry. Saf Health Work. 2017;8(1):67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahi M, Motamedzade M, Heidarimoghadam R, et al. Effects of mental workload on physiological and subjective responses during traffic density monitoring: a field study. Appl Ergon. 2016;52:95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stasi LL, Antolí A, Cañas JJ. Main sequence: an index for detecting mental workload variation in complex tasks. Appl Ergon. 2011;42(6):807–813. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher GG, Stachowski A, Infurna FJ, et al. Mental work demands, retirement, and longitudinal trajectories of cognitive functioning. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):231–242. doi: 10.1037/a0035724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahramani A, Khalkhali HR. Development and validation of a safety climate scale for manufacturing industry. Saf Health Work. 2015;6(2):97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asilian-Mahabadi H, Khosravi Y, Hassanzadeh-Rangi N, et al. Factors affecting unsafe behavior in construction projects: development and validation of a new questionnaire. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018:1–8. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1408243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–497. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. Int J Test. 2001;1(1):55–86. doi: 10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
   Google Scholar
• Roberson RB III, Elliott TR, Chang JE, et al. Exploratory factor analysis in rehabilitation psychology: a content analysis. Rehabil Psychol. 2014;59(4):429–438. doi: 10.1037/a0037899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigliotti E. Discovering statistics using SPSS. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(3):303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04270_1.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981;86:127–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raykov T. Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2001;54(2):315–323. doi: 10.1348/000711001159582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–467. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittingham R. The blame machine: why human error causes accidents. Oxford: Routledge; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi Y, Asilian-Mahabadi H, Hajizadeh E, et al. Structural modeling of safety performance in construction industry. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43(8):1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Model. 2009;16(3):397–438. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish D. Should we use F-tests for model fit instead of chi-square in overidentified structural equation models? Organ Res Methods. 2018:1094428118809495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharaldsen J, Olsen E, Rundmo T. A longitudinal study of safety climate on the Norwegian continental shelf. Saf Sci. 2008;46(3):427–439. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr M. The SAGE library of methods in social and personality psychology: scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London: SAGE; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wynd CA, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25(5):508–518. doi: 10.1177/0193945903252998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar