Application and modification of the Tripod Beta method for analyzing the causes of oil and gas industry accidents

References

• Dadashzadeh M, Rouzbeh A, Faisal K, et al. Explosion modeling and analysis of BP Deepwater Horizon accident. Saf Sci. 2013;57:150–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paté-Cornell ME. Learning from the Piper Alpha accident: a postmortem analysis of technical and organizational factors. Risk Anal. 1993;13(2):215–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh JH, Haga RA, Favarò FM, et al. Texas City refinery accident: case study in breakdown of defense-in-depth and violation of the safety–diagnosability principle in design. Eng Fail Anal. 2014;36:121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP). Safety data reporting user guide – 2015 data; 2015. Report No. 2015su. Available from: https://www.iogp.org/bookstore/product/safety-data-reporting-user-guide-2015-data/
   Google Scholar
• Reason J. The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990;327(1241):475–484. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariuki SG, Lowe K. Integrating human factors into process hazard analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2007;92:1764–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren J, Jenkinson I, Wang J, et al. A methodology to model causal relationships on offshore safety assessment focusing on human and organizational factors. J Safety Res. 2008;39:87–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmreich RL. On error management: lessons from aviation. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):781–785. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Oxford: Elsevier; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE). The Buncefield Incident 11 December 2005, the final report of the Major Incident Investigation Board. Volume 1 and 2. Richmond: HSE Books; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nivolianitou Z, Konstandinidou M, Michalis C. Statistical analysis of major accidents in petrochemical industry notified to the Major Accident Reporting System (MARS). J Hazard Mater. 2006;137(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.12.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoop JA. Independent accident investigation: a modern safety tool. J Hazard Mater. 2004;111(1):39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C, Holloway CM. A survey of logic formalisms to support mishap analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2003;80(3):271–291. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00053-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolas D, Dien Y, Felicio A, et al. Guidelines for safety investigations of accidents. Brussels: European Safety Reliability and Data Association (ESReDA); 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi ZH, editor. A review of accident modelling approaches for complex socio-technical systems. Proceedings of the Twelfth Australian Workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software and Safety-related Programmable Systems; 2007 Aug 30–31; Adelaide. Brisbane River, Australia: Australian Computer Society; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Reason J. Human error. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ohno T. Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Tokyo: Diamond; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Shappell SA, Wiegmann DA. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the human factors analysis and classification system. Ann Arbor (MI): Ashgate; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci. 2004;42(4):237–270. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveson N. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci. 1997;27(2):183–213. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi O, Mortazavi SB, Khavanin A, et al. Validity and consistency assessment of accident analysis methods in the petroleum industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;25(3):355–361. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1387400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklet S. Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. J Hazard Mater. 2004;111(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson WG. MORT safety assurance systems. New York (NY): Dekker; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Knox NW, Eicher RW. Mort user’s manual: for use with the management oversight and risk tree analytical logic diagram. Idaho Falls (ID): System Safety Development Center; 1992. (DOE/ SSDC-76-45/4-Rev.3; no. DE92013785).
   Google Scholar
• Buys J, Clark J. Events and causal factors charting. Idaho Falls (ID): SCIENTECH; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Svenson O. On models of incidents and accidents. Paper presented at: 7th European Conference on Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control; 1999 Sep 21–24; Villeneuve d’Ascq; France.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson O, Rollenhagen C. The MTO concept and organizational learning at Forsmark NPP, Sweden. Paper presented at: IAEA International Conference on Safety Culture in Nuclear Installations; 2002 Dec 2–6; Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry TS. Modern accident investigation and analysis. New York (NY): Wiley; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Katsakiori P, Sakellaropoulos G, Manatakis E. Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models. Saf Sci. 2009;47(7):1007–1015. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower-Jones A, van der Graf G. Experience with Tripod Beta incident analysis. Paper presented at: Society of Petroleum Engineers: International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production; 1998 Jun 7–10; Caracas.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar WA, Groeneweg J, Hudson P, et al. Promoting safety in the oil industry. The Ergonomics Society Lecture presented at the Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, Edinburgh, 13–16 April 1993. Ergonomics. 1994;37(12):1999–2013. doi: 10.1080/00140139408964963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson S. Assessment of accident investigation methods for wildland firefighting incidents by case study method [master’s thesis]. Montana (MT): University of Montana; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2012;104:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins A. Lessons from Longboard: the ESSO gas plant explosion. Sydney: CCH Australia; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson C, de Almeida IM. An investigation into the loss of the Brazilian space programme’s launch vehicle VLS-1 V03. Saf Sci. 2008;46(1):38–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedung I, Rasmussen J. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents. Saf Sci. 2002;40(5):397–417. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00036-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J, Suedung I. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Karlstad: Swedish Rescue Services Agency; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlbruch B, Schöbel M. SOL – safety through organizational learning: a method for event analysis. Saf Sci. 2011;49(1):27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doidge JP. Successful health and safety management. Perfusion. 1997;12:217–220. doi: 10.1177/026765919701200402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syvertsen R-AH. Modeling the Deepwater Horizon blowout using STAMP [master’s thesis]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen NS. Coding ATC incident data using HFACS: inter-coder consensus. Saf Sci. 2011;49(10):1365–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon PM, Cornelissen M, Trotter MJ. Systems-based accident analysis methods: a comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP. Saf Sci. 2012;50(4):1158–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Institute. Guidance on investigating and analysing human and organisational factors aspects of incidents and accidents. London: Energy Institute; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kontogiannis T, Leopoulos V, Marmaras N. A comparison of accident analysis techniques for safety-critical man–machine systems. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;25(4):327–347. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00022-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison LM. Best practices in incident investigation in the chemical process industries with examples from the industry sector and specifically from Nova Chemicals. J Hazard Mater. 2004;111(1):161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivolianitou Z, Leopoulos V, Konstantinidou M. Comparison of techniques for accident scenario analysis in hazardous systems. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2004;17(6):467–475. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi O, Mortazavi SB, Khavanin A, et al. Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for accident analysis method selecting in oil industry. Health Scope. 2018;7(2):1–8. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.80348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi O, Mortazavi SB, Khavanin A. Selection of the optimal method for analysis of accidents in petroleum industry using fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS multi-criteria decision methods. Iran Occup Health. 2017;14(2):166–180. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson PTW, Groeneweg J, Reason JT, et al. Application of Tripod to measure latent errors in North Sea gas platforms: validity of failure state profiles. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment; 1991 Nov 10–14. The Hague: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1991; p.725–730.
   Google Scholar