An empirical comparison of OWAS, RULA and REBA based on self-reported discomfort

References

• Ministry of Employment and Labor. [Industrial accidents status analysis]. Seoul: Ministry of Employment and Labor; 2018. Korean.
   Google Scholar
• van der Beek A, Frings-Dresen MHW. Assessment of mechanical exposure in ergonomic epidemiology. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:291–299. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.5.291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel J, Mathiassen SE. Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. Ergonomics. 1994;37(6):979–988. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbom Å. Repetitive work of the upper extremity: part II – the scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide. Int J Ind Ergon. 1994;14:59–86. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(94)90006-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riihimäki H. Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17:81–90. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel J, Westgaard R. Occupational and individual risk factors for shoulder-neck complaints: part II the scientific basis (literature review) for the guide. Int J Ind Ergon. 1992;10:85–104. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(92)90051-Z
   Google Scholar
• Aarås A, Westgaard RH, Stranden E. Postural angles as an indicator of postural load and muscular injury in occupational work situations. Ergonomics. 1988;31(6):915–933. doi: 10.1080/00140138808966731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genaidy A, Karwowski W. The effects of neutral posture deviations on perceived joint discomfort ratings in sitting and standing postures. Ergonomics. 1993;36:785–792. doi: 10.1080/00140139308967942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyserling WM, Punnett L, Fine LJ. Trunk posture and back pain: identification and control of occupational risk factors. Appl Ind Hyg. 1988;3:87–92. doi: 10.1080/08828032.1988.10389276
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, low backs. Cincinnati (OH): US Department of Health and Human Services; 1997. (DHHS [NIOSH] publication; no. 97-141).
   Google Scholar
• Ryan GA. The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in supermarket workers. Ergonomics. 1989;32:359–371. doi: 10.1080/00140138908966103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David GC. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med (Lond). 2005;55:190–199. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genaidy AM, Al-Shedi AA, Karwowski W. Postural stress analysis in industry. Appl Ergon. 1994;25:77–87. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(94)90068-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Buckle P. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. Ergonomics. 1999;42(5):674–695. doi: 10.1080/001401399185388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Galán N, Pérez-Alonso J, Callejón-Ferre Á-J, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders: OWAS review. Ind Health. 2017;55:314–337. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y-G, Lee S, Lee K-S, et al. Comparisons of ergonomic evaluation tools (ALLA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for farm work. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24(2):218–223. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1306960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukadarin EH, Deros BM, Ghani J, et al. Postural assessment in pen-and-paper-based observational methods and their associated health effects: a review. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(3):389–398. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1156924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdorf A, Derksen J, Naaktgeboren B, et al. Measurement of trunk bending during work by direct observation and continuous measurement. Appl Ergon. 1992;23:263–267. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90154-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karhu O, Kansi P, Kuorinka I. Correcting working postures in industry: a practical method for analysis. Appl Ergon. 1977;8:199–201. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdorf A. Assessment of postural load on the back in occupational epidemiology [dissertation]. Rotterdam: Erasmus University; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Takala EP, Pehkonen I, Forsman M, et al. Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36:3–24. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong YK, Han JG, Kim DM. Development of an ergonomic checklist for the investigation of work-related lower limb disorders in farming – ALLA: agricultural lower limb assessment. J Ergon Soc Korea. 2010;29(6):933–942. doi: 10.5143/JESK.2010.29.6.933
   Google Scholar
• McAtamney L, Corlett EN. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon. 1993;24:91–99. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hignett S, McAtamney L. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon. 2000;31:201–205. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdanirad S, Khoshakhagh AH, Habib E, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of three ergonomic risk assessment methods – RULA, LUBA, and NERPA – to predict the upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Ind J Occup Environ Med. 2018;22(1):17–21. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_23_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee D, Karwowski W. LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time. Appl Ergon. 2001;32:357–366. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00006-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Lite A, Garcia M, Domingo R, et al. Novel ergonomic postural assessment method (NERPA) using product-process computer aided engineering for ergonomic workplace design. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee D, Karwowski W. A comparison of three observational techniques for assessing postural loads in industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2007;13(1):3–14. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2007.11076704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari NA, Sheikh MJ. Evaluation of work posture by RULA and REBA: a case study. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng. 2014;11(4):18–23. doi: 10.9790/1684-11431823
   Google Scholar
• Choobineh A, Tosian R, Alhamdi Z, et al. Ergonomic intervention in carpet mending operation. Appl Ergon. 2004;35:493–496. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels JA, Landeweerd JA, Kant Y. An OWAS-based analysis of nurses’ working postures. Ergonomics. 1994;37:909–919. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez BA, Adenso-Diaz B, Torre PG. Ergonomic performance and quality relationship: an empirical evidence case. Int J Ind Ergon. 2003;31:33–40. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00116-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaccesi M, Pagnotta A, Soccetti A, et al. Investigation of work-related disorders in truck drivers using RULA method. Appl Ergon. 2003;34:303–307. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00052-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila M, Karwowski W, Vilkki M. Analysis of working postures in hammering tasks on building construction sites using the computerized OWAS method. Appl Ergon. 1993;24:405–412. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90172-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sane SM, Karandikar VN, Nandudikar SS, et al. Application of RULA and REBA for ergonomic assessment in assembly workers. Int J Mul Res Adv Eng. 2011;3(4):23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Scott GB, Lambe NR. Working practices in a perchery system, using the OVAKO working posture analysing system (OWAS). Appl Ergon. 1996;27:281–284. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(96)00009-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miedema MC, Douwes M, Dul J. Recommended maximum holding times for prevention of discomfort of static standing postures. Int J Ind Ergon. 1997;19:9–18. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(95)00037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong T, Punnett L, Ketner P. Subjective worker assessments of hand tools used in automobile assembly. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1989;50:639–645. doi: 10.1080/15298668991375290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na S. An observation method for postural stress associated with an external load based on the perceived discomfort [dissertation]. Pohang: POSTECH; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Borg G. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffin DB. Ergonomics guide for the assessment of human static strength. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1975;36:505–511. doi: 10.1080/0002889758507283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlett EN, Bishop RP. A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics. 1976;19(2):175–182. doi: 10.1080/00140137608931530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlett EN, Manenica J. The effects and measurement of working postures. Appl Ergon. 1980;11(1):7–16. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(80)90115-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul J, Douwes M, Smitt P. Ergonomic guidelines for the prevention of discomfort of static postures based on endurance data. Ergonomics. 1994;37:807–815. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee D, Lee I. Relationships between subjective and objective measures in assessing postural stresses. Appl Ergon. 2012;43:277–282. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey EJ, Gallwey TJ. Effects of wrist posture, pace and exertion on discomfort. Int J Ind Ergon. 2002;29:85–94. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00053-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee D, Na S, Chung MK. Effect of external load at varying hand positions on perceived discomfort. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(3):397–408. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee D. Gender differences in rankings of joint motion stressfulness based on psychophysical scaling. Int J Ind Ergon. 2005;35:461–469. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2004.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar