References
- Eurofound. Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – overview report (2017 update) [Internet]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 29]; [164 p.]. Available from: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1634en.pdf
- Direction de l’animation de la recherche, des études et des statistiques (DARES) [Directorate for Research, Studies and Statistics]. Intensité du travail et usages des technologies de l’information et de la communication [Work requirements and use of information and communication technologies] [Internet]. Paris: Synthèse stat’ n°14 [Statistical synthesis no. 14]; 2015 [cited 2019 Nov 29]; [273 p.]. French. Available from: http://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Synthese-Stat_no_14_-_Conditions_de_travail_Vol-3_.pdf
- Direction de l'animation de la recherche, des études et des statistiques (DARES) [Directorate for Research, Studies and Statistics]. Les femmes occupent des emplois où le travail semble moins épanouissant [Women are in jobs where the work seems less fulfilling] [Internet]. Paris: Analyses n°82 [Analyses no. 82]; 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 29]; [10 p.]. French. Available from: http://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/2010-082.pdf
- Coelho DA, Lourenço ML. A tentative efficiency index for pointing device use in computer aided design: a pilot study. Work. 2018;61(1):157–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182785
- Cook C, Burgess-Limerick R, Chang S. The prevalence of neck and upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms in computer mouse users. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;26(3):347–356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00010-X
- Jensen C, Finsen L, Søgaard K, et al. Musculoskeletal symptoms and duration of computer and mouse use. Int J Ind Ergon. 2002;30(4–5):265–275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00130-0
- Karlqvist LK, Bernmark E, Ekenvall L, et al. Computer mouse position as a determinant of posture, muscular load and perceived exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998;24(1):62–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.279
- Dehghan N, Choobineh A, Razeghi M, et al. Designing a new computer mouse and evaluating some of its functional parameters. J Res Health Sci. 2014;14(2):132–135.
- Cook C, Burgess-Limerick R, Papalia S. The effect of wrist rests and forearm support during keyboard and mouse use. Int J Ind Ergon. 2004;33(5):463–472. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2003.12.002
- Kumar R, Kumar S. A comparison of muscular activity involved in the use of two different types of computer mouse. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2008;14(3):305–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2008.11076770
- Aublet-Cuvelier A, Gaudez C, Cail F. Troubles musculosquelettiques des membres supérieurs d’origine professionnelle [Upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders of occupational origin]. Encyclopédie Médico-Chirurgicale, Pathologie professionnelle et de l’environnement [Medico-surgical encyclopedia, Occupational pathology and environment]. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Elsevier Masson SAS; 2015;10(3):16-793-E-10. French.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomics of human–system interaction – part 410: design criteria for physical input devices. Brussels: ISO; 2008. (Standard No. ISO 9241-410); [100 p.].
- Chen H-M, Leung C-T. The effect on forearm and shoulder muscle activity in using different slanted computer mice. Clin Biomech. 2007;22(5):518–523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.006
- Gaudez C, Cail F. Effects of mouse slant and desktop position on muscular and postural stresses, subject preference and performance in women aged 18–40 years. Ergonomics. 2016;59(11):1473–1486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1148783
- Gustafsson E, Hagberg M. Computer mouse use in two different hand positions: exposure, comfort, exertion and productivity. Appl Ergon. 2003;34(2):107–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00005-X
- Houwink A, Oude Hengel KM, Odell D, et al. Providing training enhances the biomechanical improvements of an alternative computer mouse design. Hum Factors. 2009;51(1):46–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720808329843
- Hedge A, Feathers D, Rollings K. Ergonomic comparison of slanted and vertical computer mouse designs. Paper presented at: 54th Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2010 Sep 27–Oct 1; San Francisco, CA.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomics – Manual handling – Part 3: Handling of low loads at high frequency. Brussels: ISO; 2007. (Standard No. ISO 11228–3); [76 p.].
- Jung K. Effects of slanted ergonomic mice on task performance and subjective responses. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(3):450–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.06.004
- Scarlett D. Ergonomic mice: comparison of performance and perceived exertion. Usability News. 2005;7(1). [cited 2019 Nov 29]; [5 p.]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara_Chaparro/publication/242573008_Ergonomic_Mice_Comparison_of_Performance_and_Perceived_Exertion/links/55e84ba908aeb65162630285/Ergonomic-Mice-Comparison-of-Performance-and-Perceived-Exertion.pdf
- Odell D, Johnson P. Evaluation of a mouse designed to improve posture and comfort. Paper presented at: Work with Computing Systems Conference, International Ergonomics Association; 2007 May 21–24; Stockholm.
- Quemelo PRV, Vieira ER. Biomechanics and performance when using a standard and a vertical computer mouse. Ergonomics. 2013;56(8):1336–1344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.805251
- Lee DL, Fleisher J, McLoone HE, et al. Alternative computer mouse design and testing to reduce finger extensor muscle activity during mouse use. Hum Factors. 2007;49(4):573–584. doi: https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X215665
- Dehghan N, Choobineh A, Razeghi M, et al. Assessment of functional parameters and comfort of a new computer mouse as compared with other types of input devices. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(4):493–497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1096060
- Cail F. Ecrans de visualisation. Santé et ergonomie [Viewing screens. Health and ergonomics]. ED 924. Vandoeuvre: Institut national de Recherche et de sécurité [French Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases]; 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 29]; [86 p.]. French. Available from: http://www.inrs.fr/media.html?refINRS=ED%20924
- Anzanello MJ, Fogliatto FS. Learning curve models and applications: literature review and research directions. Int J Ind Ergon. 2011;41(5):573–583. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.05.001
- Dennerlein JT, DiMarino M. Forearm electromyographic changes with the use of a haptic force-feedback computer mouse. Hum Factors. 2006;48(1):130–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1518/001872006776412252
- Lee K-W, Lee Y-C. Design and validation of virtually multiple mouse wheels. Int J Ind Ergon. 2010;40(4):392–401. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.03.004
- Müller C, Tomatis L, Läubli T. Muscular load and performance compared between a pen and a computer mouse as input devices. Int J Ind Ergon. 2010;40(6):607–617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.08.004
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomics of human–system interaction. Part 420: selection of physical input devices. Brussels: ISO; 2011. (Standard No. ISO 9241–420); [94 p.].
- Gaudez C, Cail F. Effets sur les sollicitations musculaires et posturales, sur la performance et le ressenti des utilisateurs de différentes souris informatiques et de leur positionnement sur le bureau [Effects on muscular and postural stresses, performance and user preference of different computer mice and of their desktop position] [Internet]. NST345. Vandoeuvre: Notes Scientifiques et Techniques de l'Institut national de Recherche et de sécurité [Scientific and Technical Notes of the French Research and Safety Institute]; 2016; [cited 2019 Nov 29]; [42 p.]. French. Available from: http://www.inrs.fr/inrs/recherche/etudes-publications-communications/doc/publication.html?refINRS=EL2012-022/P2016-042/NS345
- Luger T, Seibt R, Rieger MA, et al. The role of motor learning on measures of physical requirements and motor variability during repetitive screwing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(7):1231. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071231
- Andersen J, Haahr J, Frost P. Risk factors for more severe regional musculoskeletal symptoms: a two-year prospective study of a general working population. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(4):1355–1364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22513
- Kallenberg L, Hermens H, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. Distinction between cases with chronic neck–shoulder pain and healthy controls with parameters derived from surface array EMG measurements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:S209–S210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.397
- Laursen B, Jensen BR. Shoulder muscle activity in young and older people during a computer mouse task. Clinical Biomechanics. 2000;15(Suppl 1):S30–S33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00057-7
- Kita K, Kato R, Yokoi H, et al. Analysis of skill acquisition process: a case study of arm reaching task. Robot Auton Syst. 2009;57(2):167–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2008.07.003
- Tomatis L, Nakaseko M, Läubli T. Co-activation and maximal EMG activity of forearm muscles during key tapping. Int J Ind Ergon. 2009;39(5):749–755. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.12.006
- Korytkowski P. Competences-based performance model of multi-skilled workers with learning and forgetting. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;77:226–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.004