References
- Benzo RM, Gremaud AL, Jerome M, et al. Learning to stand: the acceptability and feasibility of introducing standing desks into college classrooms. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(8):823. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080823
- Wallmann-Sperlich B, Bucksch J, Schneider S, et al. Socio-demographic, behavioural and cognitive correlates of work-related sitting time in German men and women. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1259
- Pilcher JJ, Baker VC. Task performance and meta-cognitive outcomes when using activity workstations and traditional desks. Front Psychol. 2016;7:957. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00957
- Wick K, Faude O, Manes S, et al. I can stand learning: a controlled pilot intervention study on the effects of increased standing time on cognitive function in primary school children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):356. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020356
- Ohlinger CM, Horn TS, Berg WP, et al. The effect of active workstation use on measures of cognition, attention, and motor skill. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(1):119–125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8.1.119
- Mansoubi M, Pearson N, Biddle SJ, et al. Using sit-to-stand workstations in offices: is there a compensation effect? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(4):720–725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000802
- Daneshmandi H, Choobineh AR, Ghaem H, et al. Proper sit–stand work schedule to reduce the negative outcomes of sedentary behavior: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 [May 18];1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2019.1679972
- Cifuentes M, Qin J, Fulmer S, et al. Facilitators and barriers to using treadmill workstations under real working conditions: a qualitative study in female office workers. Am J Health Promot. 2015;30(2):93–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.140123-QUAL-43
- Bantoft C, Summers MJ, Tranent PJ, et al. Effect of standing or walking at a workstation on cognitive function: a randomized counterbalanced trial. Hum Factors. 2016;58(1):140–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815605446
- Russell BA, Summers MJ, Tranent PJ, et al. A randomised control trial of the cognitive effects of working in a seated as opposed to a standing position in office workers. Ergonomics. 2016;59(6):737–744. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1094579
- Daneshmandi H, Choobineh AR, Ghaem H, et al. Adverse effects of prolonged sitting behavior on the general health of office workers. J Lifestyle Med. 2017;7(2):69–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2017.7.2.69
- Daneshmandi H, Choobineh AR, Ghaem H, et al. The effect of musculoskeletal problems on fatigue and productivity of office personnel: a cross-sectional study. J Prev Med Hyg. 2017;58(3):252–258.
- Botter J, Ellegast RP, Burford EM, et al. Comparison of the postural and physiological effects of two dynamic workstations to conventional sitting and standing workstations. Ergonomics. 2016;59(3):449–463. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1080861
- Grunseit AC, Chau JY-Y, Van der Ploeg HP, et al. ‘Thinking on your feet’: a qualitative evaluation of sit–stand desks in an Australian workplace. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-365
- Messing K, Tissot F, Stock S. Lower limb pain, standing, sitting and walking: the importance of freedom to adjust one’s posture [CD-ROM]. Proceedings of the 16th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association; Maastricht. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2006 July 10–14.
- Reiff C, Marlatt K, Dengel DR. Difference in caloric expenditure in sitting versus standing desks. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(7):1009–1011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.9.7.1009
- Colcombe S, Kramer AF. Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci. 2003;14(2):125–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01430
- Caldwell JA, Prazinko B, Caldwell JL. Body posture affects electroencephalographic activity and psychomotor vigilance task performance in sleep-deprived subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(1):23–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00283-3
- Commissaris DA, Konemann R, Hiemstra-van Mastrigt S, et al. Effects of a standing and three dynamic workstations on computer task performance and cognitive function tests. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(6):1570–1578. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.003
- Zhang Z, Zhang B, Cao C, et al. The effects of using an active workstation on executive function in Chinese college students. PloS one. 2018;13(6):e0197740.
- Melzer I, Benjuya N, Kaplanski J. Age-related changes of postural control: effect of cognitive tasks. Gerontology. 2001;47(4):189–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000052797
- Dinardo J. Natural experiments and quasi-natural experiments. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE, editors. Microeconometrics. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. p. 139–153.
- Lee R, Nieman D. Nutritional assessment. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2003.
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
- Davoudi MR, Omidi A, Sehat M. Comparison of anxiety and depression symptoms between male daily smokers and nondaily smokers resident in Kashan city during 2016–2017. Feyz. 2017;21(5):490–497.
- Jafar Tabatabaee T, Ahadi HH, Khamesian A. The effect of optimism training on the anxiety and depression of students of psychology at theazad university of Birjand (2012). Mod Care J. 2013;10(1):34–42.
- Riquelme I, Arnould C, Hatem SM, et al. The two-arm coordination test: maturation of bimanual coordination in typically developing children and deficits in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2019;22(5):312–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2018.1498552
- Paridon HM, Kaufmann M. Multitasking in work-related situations and its relevance for occupational health and safety: effects on performance, subjective strain and physiological parameters. EJOP. 2010;6(4):110–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v6i4.226
- Rahmani J. The reliability and validity of Raven’s progressive matrics test among the students of Azad Khorasgan University. J Dane Va Pazhouhesh in Psychol. 2008;9(34):61–74.
- Cosgrove KP, Mazure CM, Staley JK. Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(8):847–855. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.001
- Miller K, Price C, Okun M, et al. Is the n-back task a valid neuropsychological measure for assessing working memory? Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;24(7):711–717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp063
- Schoofs D, Preuß D, Wolf OT. Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008;33(5):643–653. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.02.004
- León-Domínguez U, Martín-Rodríguez JF, León-Carrión J. Executive n-back tasks for the neuropsychological assessment of working memory. Behav Brain Res. 2015;292:167–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.06.002
- Ma L, Chang L, Chen X, et al. Working memory test battery for young adults: computerized working memory assessment. PloS One. 2017;12(3):e0175047.
- Ecker UK, Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, et al. The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010;36(1):170–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017891
- Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Perrig WJ, et al. The concurrent validity of the n-back task as a working memory measure. Memory. 2010;18(4):394–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211003702171
- Olivier I, Cuisinier R, Vaugoyeau M, et al. Age-related differences in cognitive and postural dual-task performance. Gait Posture. 2010;32(4):494–499. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.008
- Akhavan-Tafti M, Azari-Khiyabani M, Hashemi Z. Improving executive functions in students with learning disabilities through a cognitive enabling program. J Res Behav Sci. 2016;14(3):372–382.
- Nejati V. Correlation of risky decision making with executive function of brain in adolescences. J Res Behav Sci. 2013;11(4):270–278.
- Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992;121(1):15–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.15
- Dos Santos Assef EC, Capovilla AGS, Capovilla FC. Computerized Stroop test to assess selective attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Span J Psychol. 2007;10(1):33–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006296
- Malek A, Amiri S. The standardization of Victoria Stroop color–word test among Iranian bilingual adolescents. Arch Iran Med. 2013;16(7):380–384.
- Jadidian A, Pasha Sharifi H. The effect of action and strategic computer games on selective reaction time and impulsive response in school pupils. Informat Communicat Technol Edu Sci. 2013;3(4):135–150.
- Luo D, Petrill SA. Elementary cognitive tasks and their roles in g estimates. Intelligence. 1999;27(2):157–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00020-3
- Bertsch S, Pesta BJ. The Wonderlic Personnel Test and elementary cognitive tasks as predictors of religious sectarianism, scriptural acceptance and religious questioning?. Intelligence. 2009;37(3):231–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.10.003
- Shelton J, Kumar GP. Comparison between auditory and visual simple reaction times. Neurosci Med. 2010;1(1):30–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/nm.2010.11004
- Gholami A, Farokhi A. Effect of goal setting on choice reaction time. Olympic. 2005;13(2):85–94.
- Mewaldt SP, Connelly CL, Simon JR. Response selection in choice reaction time: test of a buffer model. Mem Cognit. 1980;8(6):606–611. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213780
- Deary IJ, Liewald D, Nissan J. A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: the Deary–Liewald reaction time task. Behav Res Methods. 2011;43(1):258–268. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0024-1
- Ghafarzadeh Ahangar S, Shafie Nia P, Shetab Boushehri N, et al. Comparison of simple and selective visual and auditory reaction time in context-dependent and context-independent cognitive styles. J Sport Manag Motor Behav. 2013;9(17):131–142.
- Jamshidzad M, Maghsoudipour M, Zakerian SA, et al. Impact of music type on motor coordination task performance among the introverted and extroverted students. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(3):444–449.
- Habibi E, Dehghan H, Dehkordy SE, et al. Evaluation of the effect of noise on the rate of errors and speed of work by the ergonomic test of two-hand co-ordination. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4(5):538.
- Nassiri P, Monazam M, Dehaghi BF, et al. The effect of noise on human performance: a clinical trial. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;4(2):212–287.
- Kakvandi N, Saberi Kakhki A, Rohbanfard H. Moradi Noor Abadi M. Effects of implicit and explicit practice schedule on performanc and learning of bimanual coordination task of elder. J Gerontol. 2018;2(4):71–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.29252/joge.2.4.71
- Tiffin J. Purdue Pegboard examiner manual. Chicago (IL): Science Research Associates; 1968.
- Çetinkaya E, Çift H, Aybar A, et al. The timing and importance of motor skills course in knee arthroscopy training. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51(4):273–277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.01.004
- Vasylenko O, Gorecka MM, Rodriguez-Aranda C. Manual dexterity in young and healthy older adults. 2. Association with cognitive abilities. Dev Psychobiol. 2018;60(4):428–439. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21618
- Gallus J, Mathiowetz V. Test–retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard for persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(1):108–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.1.108
- Rafiee S, Taghizadeh G, Edrese M, et al. Test–retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard test for chidren with Down syndrome. Koomesh. 2011;13(1):35–43.
- Chester MR, Rys MJ, Konz SA. Leg swelling, comfort and fatigue when sitting, standing, and sit/standing. Int J Ind Ergon. 2002;29(5):289–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00069-5
- Hedge A, Jagdeo J, Agarwal A, et al. Sitting or standing for computer work – does a negative-tilt keyboard tray make a difference? Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2005;49(8):808–811. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504900804
- Mc S, Jay K, Andersen LL. Assessing the effect of self-positioning on cognitive executive function. J Ergon. 2012;2(4):1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000110
- Mohammadi S, Mokhtarinia HR, Jafarpisheh AS, et al. Investigating the effects of different working postures on cognitive performance. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2018;18(4):268–277. doi: https://doi.org/10.21859/jrehab.18.4.1
- Agnew J, Bolla-Wilson K, Kawas CH, et al. Purdue Pegboard age and sex norms for people 40 years old and older. Dev Neuropsychol. 1988;4(1):29–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/87565648809540388