Resilient trade-offs between safety and profitability: perspectives of sharp-end drivers in the Beijing taxi service system

References

• Fairbanks RJ, Wears RL, Woods DD, et al. Resilience and resilience engineering in health care. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2014;40(8):376–383. doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(14)40049-7
   Google Scholar
• Westgaard RH, Winkel J. Occupational musculoskeletal and mental health: significance of rationalization and opportunities to create sustainable production systems – a systematic review. Appl Ergon. 2011;42(2):261–296. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagell M, Johnston D, Veltri A, et al. Is safe production an oxymoron? Prod Oper Manag. 2014;23(7):1161–1175. doi: 10.1111/poms.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madni AM, Jackson S. Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering. IEEE Syst J. 2009;3(2):181–191. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriarca R, Gravio GD, Costantino F, et al. A paradigm shift to enhance patient safety in healthcare, a resilience engineering approach: scoping review of available evidence. Int J Healthc Tech Manag. 2017;16(3–4):319–343. doi: 10.1504/IJHTM.2017.088872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li L, Prato CG. The relation between working conditions, aberrant driving behaviour and crash propensity among taxi drivers in China. Accident Anal Prev. 2019;126:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La QN, Lee AH, Meuleners LB, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with road traffic crash among taxi drivers in Hanoi, Vietnam. Accident Anal Prev. 2013;50:451–455. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Tao L, Li X, et al. A survey of taxi drivers’ aberrant driving behavior in Beijing. J Transp Saf Secur. 2014;6(1):34–43. doi: 10.1080/19439962.2013.799624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maag U, Vanasse C, Dionne G, et al. Taxi drivers’ accidents: how binocular vision problems are related to their rate and severity in terms of the number of victims. Accident Anal Prev. 1997;29(2):217–224. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(96)00075-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cara F, Lagrange V. Emerging expertise in process control. Ergonomics. 1999;42(11):1418–1430. doi:10.1080/00140-1399184785 doi: 10.1080/001401399184785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method: modelling complex socio-technical systems. Farnham: Ashgate; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Prologue: the scope of resilience engineering. In: Hollnagel E, Pariès J, Woods DD, Wreathall J, editors. Resilience engineering in practice: a guidebook. Farnham: Ashgate; 2011. p. xxix–xiv.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Disaster resilience: a national imperative. Washington: US National Academies Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffcott SA, Ibrahim JE, Cameron PA. Resilience in healthcare and clinical handover. BMJ Qual Saf. 2009;18(4):256–260. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.030163
   Google Scholar
• Patterson M, Deutsch ES. Safety-I, Safety-II and resilience engineering. Curr Prob Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2015;45(12):382–389. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righi AW, Saurin TA, Wachs P. A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: research areas and a research agenda proposal. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2015;141:142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Y, Yue Y, Zhou H, et al. Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective. Nat Hazards. 2014;70(1):609–627. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-0831-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher D, Sarkar M. Psychological resilience. Eur Psychol. 2013;18:12–23. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenstein NO, Feisel E, Hartmann E, et al. Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: a systematic review and paths for further investigation. Int J Phys Distr Log. 2015;45(1/2):90–117. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M. Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plan. 2016;147:38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue X, Wang L, Yang RJ. Exploring the science of resilience: critical review and bibliometric analysis. Nat Hazards. 2018;90:477–510. doi: 10.1007/s11069-017-3040-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto A. Redefining safety in the era of risk trade-off and sustainability. J Risk Res. 2013;16(3–4):369–377. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2012.729527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontogiannis T, Malakis S, McDonald N. Integrating operational and risk information with system risk models in air traffic control. Cogn Technol Work. 2017;19(2–3):345–361. doi: 10.1007/s10111-017-0409-3
   Google Scholar
• Saat MR, Barkan CPL. Generalized railway tank car safety design optimization for hazardous materials transport: addressing the trade-off between transportation efficiency and safety. J Hazard Mater. 2011;189(1):62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morel G, Amalberti R, Chauvin C. Articulating the differences between safety and resilience: the decision-making process of professional sea-fishing skippers. Hum Factors. 2008;50(1):1–16. doi: 10.1518/001872008X250683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujan M, Spurgeon P, Cooke M. Translating tensions into safe practices through dynamic trade-offs: the secret second handover. In: Wears R, Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J, editors. The resilience of everyday clinical work. Farnham: Ashgate; 2015, p. 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Le Q. Trade-off between local access and safety considerations in childbirth: rural Tasmanian women’s perspectives. Aust J Rural Health. 2012;20:144–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01266.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reader TW, Reddy G, Brett SJ. Impossible decision? An investigation of risk trade-offs in the intensive care unit. Ergonomics. 2018;61(1):122–133. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1301573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educa Eval Policy An. 1989;11(3):255–274. doi:10.3102/016237-37011003255 doi: 10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G. Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(2):322–333. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adie W, Cairns J, Macdiarmid J, et al. Safety culture and accident risk control: perceptions of professional divers and offshore workers. Safety Sci. 2005;43(2):131–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipman ML, MacGregor CG, Smiley AM, et al. The role of exposure in comparisons of crash risk among different drivers and driving environments. Accident Anal Prev. 1993;25(2):207–211. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90061-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam LT. Environmental factors associated with crash-related mortality and injury among taxi drivers in New South Wales, Australia. Accident Anal Prev. 2004;36(5):905–908. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JB. Weather-related road accidents in England and Wales: a spatial analysis. J Transp Geogr. 1996;4(3):201–212. doi: 10.1016/0966-6923(96)00006-3
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Liu JJ, Gao Y. Analyzing the spatio-temporal characteristics of Beijing’s OD trip volume based on time series clustering method. J Geo-inform Sci. 2016;18(9):1227–1239.
   Google Scholar
• Tian J, Lin Z, Wang F. Ant colony optimization algorithm for understanding of trade-offs between safety and benefit: a case of Beijing taxi service system. Cogn Technol Work. 2020;22(3):489–499. doi: 10.1007/s10111-019-00585-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PC, Kendall LM, Hulin CL. The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: a strategy for the study of attitudes. Chicago (IL): Rand McNally; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss DJ, Dawis RV, England GW. Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation. Minneapolis: Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Wang F, Tian J, Lin Z. Empirical study of gap and correlation between philosophies Safety-I and Safety-II: a case of Beijing taxi service system. Appl Ergon. 2020;82:102952. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DD. Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2015;141:5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. Safety-II in practice: developing the resilience potentials. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Costella MF, Saurin TA, deMacedo Guimarães LB. A method for assessing health and safety management systems from the resilience engineering perspective. Safety Sci. 2009;47(8):1056–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström J, VanWinsen R, Henriqson E. On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: a literature review. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2015;141:131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar