When and why telepressure and technostress creators impair employee well-being

References

• Korunka C, Hoonakker P, editors. The impact of ICT on quality of working life. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wang K, Shu Q, Tu Q. Technostress under different organizational environments: an empirical investigation. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;24(6):3002–3013. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan BS, et al. The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. J Manag Inf Syst. 2007;24(1):301–328. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apt W, Bovenschulte M, Hartmann EA, et al. Foresight-Studie ‘Digitale Arbeitswelt’ [Foresight study: digital world of work] [Internet]. Institut für Innovation und Technik [Institute for Innovation and Technology]; 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 4]. German. Available from: https://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Publikationen/Forschungsberichte/f463-digitale-arbeitswelt.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (accessed 14 December 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Kreinsen H, Weyer J. editors. Wandel von Produktionsarbeit – ‘Industrie 4.0’ [Developments of production work – ‘Industry 4.0’]. Soziologisches Arbeitspapier [Sociological working paper] 38/2014. Dortmund: Technische Universität Dortmund (TU Dortmund); 2014 [cited 2019 Dec 14]. German. Available from: http://www.wiwi.tu-dortmund.de/wiwi/ts/de/forschung/veroeff/soz_arbeitspapiere/AP-SOZ-38.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spath D, Ganschar O, Gerlach S, et al. Produktionsarbeit der Zukunft – Industrie 4.0 [Production work of the future – Industry 4.0]. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation IAO; 2013 [cited 2019 Dec 14]. German. Available from: https://microsites.schott.com/d/studentchallenge/c7d319bc-3fd9-40d2-85c2-636906b2c2f0/1.0/produktionsarbeit_der_zukunft_-_industrie_4_0__fraunhofer_studie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J. The autonomy paradox: the implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organ Sci. 2013;24(5):1337–1357. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek EE, Lautsch BA, Eaton SC. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. J Vocat Behav. 2006;68(2):347–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Driscoll MP, Brough P, Timms C, et al. Engagement with information and communication technology and psychological well-being. In: Perrewe PL, Ganster DC, editors. Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 8): new developments in theoretical and conceptual approaches to stress. Bingley: Emerald; 2010. p. 269–316.
   Google Scholar
• Day A, Paquet S, Scott N, et al. Perceived information and communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: the moderating effect of organizational ICT support. J Occup Heal Psychol. 2012;17(4):473–491. doi: 10.1037/a0029837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek B, Tement S. Work intensification and the work–home interface: the moderating effect of individual work–home segmentation strategies and organizational segmentation supplies. J Pers Psychol. 2016;15(2):76–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragu-Nathan TS, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS, et al. The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inf Syst Res. 2008;19(4):417–433. doi: 10.1287/isre.1070.0165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber LK, Santuzzi AM. Please respond ASAP: workplace telepressure and employee recovery. J Occup Heal Psychol. 2015;20(2):172–189. doi: 10.1037/a0038278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushlev K, Dunn EW. Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;43:220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell E, Woods SA, Banks AP. Examining conscientiousness as a key resource in resisting email interruptions: implications for volatile resources and goal achievement. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2017;90(3):407–435. doi: 10.1111/joop.12177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santuzzi AM, Barber LK. Workplace telepressure and worker well-being: the intervening role of psychological detachment. Occup Heal Sci. 2018;2(4):337–363. doi: 10.1007/s41542-018-0022-8
   Google Scholar
• Richardson KM. Managing employee stress and wellness in the new millennium. J Occup Heal Psychol. 2017;22(3):423–428. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands–resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22(3):309–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115
   Google Scholar
• Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24(2):285–308. doi: 10.2307/2392498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasek RA. Demand/control model: a social, emotional, and physiological approach to stress risk and active behavior development. In: ILO encyclopedia of occupational health and safety. Geneva: International Labor Organization; 2011 [cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.iloencyclopaedia.org/part-v-77965/psychosocial-and-organizational-factors
   Google Scholar
• Meijman TF, Mulder G. Psychological aspects of workload. In: Drenth PJD, Thierry H, editors. Handbook of work and organizational psychology, work psychology (Vol. 2). Hove: Psychology Press; 1998. p. 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Fuglseth AM, Sørebø Ø. The effects of technostress within the context of employee use of ICT. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;40:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jena RK. Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: an empirical study among Indian academician. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;51:1116–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Torre G, Esposito A, Sciarra I, et al. Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019;92(1):13–35. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra S, Shirish A, Srivastava SC. Does technostress inhibit employee innovation? Examining the linear and curvilinear influence of technostress creators. Commun Assoc Inf Sys. 2019;44(19):229–331.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava SC, Chandra S, Shirish A. Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Inf Sys J. 2015;25(4):355–401. doi: 10.1111/isj.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Weinert C, et al. The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: a study of Facebook use. Inf Sys J. 2015;25(3):275–308. doi: 10.1111/isj.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R. Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q. 2011;35(4):831–858. doi: 10.2307/41409963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieseler C, Grubenmann S, Meckel M, et al. The leadership dimension of coping with technostress. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2014 Jan 6–9. Waikoloa: IIEE; 2014. p. 530–539.
   Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Christianson MK, Price RH. Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Acad Manag Perspect. 2007;21(3):51–63. doi: 10.5465/amp.2007.26421238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern ML, Waters LE, Adler A, et al. A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: application of the PERMA framework. J Pos Psych. 2015;10(3):262–271. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.936962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A. Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum MC, Sen S, editors. The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993. p. 30–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S. The recovery paradox: portraying the complex interplay between job stressors, lack of recovery, and poor well-being. Res Organ Behav. 2018;38:169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzion D, Eden D, Lapidot Y. Relief from job stressors and burnout: reserve service as a respite. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(4):577–585. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S, Fritz C. The recovery experience questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Heal Psychol. 2007;12(3):204–221. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S, Fritz C. Recovery from job stress: the stressor–detachment model as an integrative framework. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(S1):S72–S103. doi: 10.1002/job.1924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S, Kuttler I, Fritz C. Job stressors, emotional exhaustion, and need for recovery: a multi-source study on the benefits of psychological detachment. J Vocat Behav. 2010;76(3):355–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safstrom M, Hartig T. Psychological detachment in the relationship between job stressors and strain. Behav Sci. 2013;3(3):418–433. doi: 10.3390/bs3030418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinnunen U, Feldt T, Siltaloppi M, et al. Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: testing recovery experiences as mediators. Europ J Work Organ Psych. 2011;20(6):805–832. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2010.524411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad UNU, Amin SM, Ismail WKW. Moderating effect of technostress inhibitors on the relationship between technostress creators and organisational commitment. Jurnal Teknologi (Soc Sci). 2014;67(1):51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Sarabadani J, Carter M, Compeau D. 10 years of research on technostress creators and inhibitors: synthesis and critique. In: Twenty-Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems. New Orleans (LA); 2018:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wall TD, Jackson RR, Mullarkey S, et al. The demands–control model of job strain: a more specific test. J Occup Organ Psych. 1996;69(2):153–166. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00607.x
   Google Scholar
• Califf CB, Sarker S, Sarker S, et al. The bright and dark side of technostress: an empirical study of healthcare workers. In: 36th International Conference on Information Systems; 2015 Dec 13–16; Fort Worth (TX). p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Tu Q, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan TS, et al. Improving end-user satisfaction through techno-stress prevention: some empirical evidences. In: Proceedings of the 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems; 2008 Aug 14–17; Toronto (ON). p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz AD, Schöllgen I, Fay D. The role of resources in the stressor–detachment model. Int J Stress Manag. 2019;26(3):306–314. doi: 10.1037/str0000100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haun VC, Nübold A, Bauer AG. Being mindful at work and at home: buffering effects in the stressor–detachment model. J Occup Organ Psych. 2018;91(2):385–410. doi: 10.1111/joop.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam SA, Reicher S. Stressing the group: social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(5):1037–1052. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins CD, Stanton BA, Niemcryk SJ, et al. A scale for the estimation of sleep problems in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(4):313–321. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90138-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M, Grünendahl M, Martin P. Age differences in stress, social resources, and well-being in middle and older age. J Gerontol Ser B: Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(4):214–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyner A, Horne JA. Gender-and age-related differences in sleep determined by home-recorded sleep logs and actimetry from 400 adults. Sleep. 1995;18(2):127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomée S, Eklöf M, Gustafsson E, et al. Prevalence of perceived stress, symptoms of depression and sleep disturbances in relation to information and communication technology (ICT) use among young adults: an explorative prospective study. Comput Hum Behav. 2007;23(3):1300–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: a longitudinal study. Organ Sci. 2004;15(1):38–55. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felfe J, Six B, Schmook R, Knorz C. Commitment Organisation, Beruf und Beschäftigungsform (COBB) [Commitment towards the organisation, the job/task and the form of employment (COBB)]. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS) [Collection of social-scientific items and scales]. 2014:1–19. German. doi: 10.6102/zis9
   Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaffinger K, Reif J, Spieß E, et al. Stress und Stressprävention in der Arbeitswelt unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Perspektive von Berufseinsteigern [Stress and stress prevention at work with a specific focus on the perspective of young professionals]. Poster presented at: 51st Convention of the DGPS (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie); 2018 Sep 15–20; Frankfurt. German.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtienne J, Stilijanow U, Junghanns G. Time and work pressure in today’s working world. In: Korunka C, Hoonakker P, editors. The impact of ICT on quality of working life. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 63–86.
   Google Scholar
• Barber LK, Jenkins JS. Creating technological boundaries to protect bedtime: examining work–home boundary management, psychological detachment and sleep. Stress Health. 2014;30(3):259–264. doi: 10.1002/smi.2536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hülsheger UR, Lang JW, Depenbrock F, et al. The power of presence: the role of mindfulness at work for daily levels and change trajectories of psychological detachment and sleep quality. J Appl Psychol. 2014;99(6):1113–1128. doi: 10.1037/a0037702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masicampo EJ, Baumeister RF. Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101(4):667–683. doi: 10.1037/a0024192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan S. Personality and espoused cultural differences in technostress creators. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;66:154–167. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell SE, Cole DA, Mitchel MA. Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: partial and complete mediation under autoregressive model. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(5):816–841. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.606716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell SE, Cole DA. Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychol Methods. 2007;12(1):23–44. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker AB. Staying engaged during the week: the effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17(4):445–455. doi: 10.1037/a0029213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Thiele Schwarz U. Inability to withdraw from work as related to poor next-day recovery and fatigue among women. Appl Psychol: An Int Rev. 2011;60(3):377–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang EC. Perfectionism and dimensions of psychological well-being in a college student sample: a test of a stress–mediation model. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2006;25(9):1001–1022. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.9.1001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wersebe H, Lieb R, Meyer AH, et al. The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an acceptance and commitment therapy self-help intervention. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018;18(1):60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff CD. Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(1):10–28. doi: 10.1159/000353263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S, Bayer UV. Switching off mentally: predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. J Occup Health Psychol. 2005;10(4):393–414. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medrano LA, Trógolo MA. Employee well-being and life satisfaction in Argentina: the contribution of psychological detachment from work. J Work Organ Psych. 2018;34(2):69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Debrot A, Siegler S, Klumb PL, et al. Daily work stress and relationship satisfaction: detachment affects romantic couples’ interactions quality. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19(8):2283–2301. doi: 10.1007/s10902-017-9922-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binnewies C, Sonnentag S, Mojza EJ. Feeling recovered and thinking about the good sides of one’s work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2009;14(3):243–256. doi: 10.1037/a0014933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg-Beckhoff G, Nielsen G, Ladekjær Larsen E. Use of information communication technology and stress, burnout, and mental health in older, middle-aged, and younger workers – results from a systematic review. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2017;23(2):160–171. doi: 10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruell G. Work fever. Train Dev J. 1987;41(1):41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Elo AL, Leppänen A, Jahkola A. Validity of a single-item measure of stress symptoms. Scand J Work, Environ & Health. 2003;29(6):444–451. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese M. Stress at work and psychosomatic complaints: a causal interpretation. J Appl Psychol. 1985;70(2):314–328. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg D. The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Banks MH, Clegg CW, Jackson PR, et al. The use of the General Health Questionnaire as an indicator of mental health in occupational studies. J Occup Psychol. 1980;53(3):187–194. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00024.x
   Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck J, Cotton JL, Jennings KR. Antecedents and consequences of role stress: a covariance structure analysis. J Organ Behav. 1989;10(1):35–58. doi: 10.1002/job.4030100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Test manual for the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. 2003. 1. https://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/Tests/UWES_GB_17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cammann C, Fichman M, Jenkins D, et al. The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. 1979. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling NA, Hammond GD. A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73(1):63–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar