A method for prioritizing the modification of ergonomic and physical aspects of the workplace to enhance overall worker satisfaction in control centre buildings

References

• Salvendy G. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 4th ed. (NJ): Wiley; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ivergard T, Hunt B. Handbook of control room design and ergonomics: a perspective for the future. 2nd ed. (FL): CRC Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Ede M. Circadian physiology expert offers nine ways to keep you alert. Can Occup Saf. 1993;31:3–4. doi: 10.1177/000841749306000101
   Google Scholar
• Newsham G, Brand J, Donnelly C, et al. Linking indoor environment conditions to job satisfaction: a field study. Build Res Inf. 2009;37(2):129–147. doi:10.1080/0961321-0802710298 doi: 10.1080/09613210802710298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikonne CN. Influence of workstation and work posture ergonomics on job satisfaction of librarians in the federal and state university libraries in southern Nigeria. Int J Human Soc Sci Res. 2014;19(9):78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson MG, Dejoy DM, Vandenberg RJ, et al. Work characteristics and employee health and well-being: test of a model of healthy work organization. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2004;77(4):565–588. doi: 10.1348/0963179042596522
   Google Scholar
• Blix AG, Cruise RJ, Mitchell BM, et al. Occupational stress among university teachers. Educ Res. 1994;36(2):157–169. doi: 10.1080/0013188940360205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Croon E, Sluiter J, Kuijer PP, et al. The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics. 2005;48(2):119–134. doi: 10.1080/00140130512331319409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelcase. Engagement and the global workplace: key findings to amplify the performance of people, teams and organizations. (MI): Steelcase; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ABB. Control room design – control room solutions that put people and productivity first [Internet]; 2017 [cited Oct 29]. Available from: https://new.abb.com/control-rooms/control-room-design
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlstrom V, Sollenberger R, Koros A, et al. Workstation and workplace ergonomics at Federal Aviation Administration operations control centers: phase 1 – evaluation of ergonomic issues. Springfield (VA): National Technical Information Service; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Fam IM, Garakani MM. A total ergonomic design approach to enhance the productivity in a complicated control system. Inf Technol J. 2007;6(7):1036–1042. doi: 10.3923/itj.2007.1036.1042
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Fisk WJ. IEQ and the impact on building occupants. ASHRAE J. 2002;44(LBNL-51288).
   Google Scholar
• Balazova I, Clausen G, Rindel JH, et al. Open-plan office environments: a laboratory experiment to examine the effect of office noise and temperature on human perception, comfort and office work performance. Indoor Air. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mardex J. Auditory, visual, and physical distractions in the workplace. New York: Cornell University, Department of Design Environmental Analysis; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomic design of control centres – part 1: principles for the design of control centres. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Danna K, Griffin RW. Health and well-being in the workplace: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Manag. 1999;25(3):357–384.
   Google Scholar
• Vischer JC. Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: how people are affected by environments for work. Archit Sci Rev. 2008;51(2):97–108. doi: 10.3763/asre.2008.5114
   Google Scholar
• Bluyssen PM. The healthy indoor environment: how to assess occupants’ wellbeing in buildings. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Preiser W, Vischer J. Assessing building performance. Abingdon: Routledge; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Moos RH. Conceptualizations of human environments. Am Psychol. 1973;28(8):652–665. doi: 10.1037/h0035722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons B, Koranteng C, Adinyira E, et al. An assessment of thermal comfort in multi storey office buildings in Ghana. J Build Constr Plan Res. 2014;2(01):30.
   Google Scholar
• Geerts J, Kaiser F. Satisfaction illuminated: study of the effects of lighting in the work environment on satisfaction. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Aries MBC. Human lighting demands: healthy lighting in an office environment. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Choi J, Loftness V, Aziz A. Analyses of IEQ and user satisfaction in 20 office buildings. In: Proceedings of 26th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture; Quebec, QC; 2009 Jun 22–24. PELA. p. 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen KL. Acoustical quality in office workstations, as assed by occupant surveys. Indoor Air. 2005: 2401–2405.
   Google Scholar
• Kwallek N, Soon K, Lewis CM. Work week productivity, visual complexity, and individual environmental sensitivity in three offices of different color interiors. Color Res Appl. 2007;32(2):130–143. doi: 10.1002/col.20298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt CJ, Veitch JA, Charles KE. Environmental satisfaction with open-plan office furniture design and layout. Ottawa (ON): Institute for Research in Construction Ottawa; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Schakib-Ekbatan K, Wagner A, Lussac C. Occupant satisfaction as an indicator for the socio-cultural dimension of sustainable office buildings development of an overall building index. In: Proceedings of Conference: Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort. Windsor: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings (NCEUB); 2010. p. 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Frontczak M, Schiavon S, Goins J, et al. Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air. 2012;22(2):119–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluyssen PM, Aries M, van Dommelen P. Comfort of workers in office buildings: the European HOPE project. Build Environ. 2011;46(1):280–288. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, De Dear R. Identifying substantive IEQ factors for efficient building management. In: The 46th Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association; Gold Coast, QLD; 2012 Nov 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomic design of control centres – part 3: control room layout. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Aas AL, Skramstad T. A case study of ISO 11064 in control centre design in the Norwegian petroleum industry. Appl Ergon. 2010;42(1):62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomic design of control centres – part 6: environmental requirements for control centres. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Peretti C, Schiavon S. Indoor environmental quality surveys. A brief literature review. (CA): California Digital Library; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomic design of control centres – part 4: layout and dimensions of workstations. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant FB, Yarnold PR. Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In: Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 1995. p. 99–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, et al. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods (Vol. 601). Belmont; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J, Anderson R, Babin B, et al. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective (Vol. 7). 7th ed. London: Pearson; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. The t test for means. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J, Christoffersen J. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy Build. 2006;38(7):743–757. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar