References
- Grida M, Mohamed R, Zaied ANH. Evaluate the impact of COVID-19 prevention policies on supply chain aspects under uncertainty. Trans Res Interdiscip Pers. 2020;8:100240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100240
- Sayan M, Sarigul Yildirim F, Sanlidag T, et al, Capacity evaluation of diagnostic tests for COVID-19 using multicriteria decision-making techniques. Comput Math Methods Med. 2020:1560250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1560250
- Maqbool A, Khan NZ. Analyzing barriers for implementation of public health and social measures to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 disease using DEMATEL method. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):887–892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.024
- Fu W, Yan S, Zong Q, et al. Mental health of college students during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. J Affect Disord. 2021;280:7–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.032
- Hezam M, Khan Nayeem M, Foul A, et al. COVID-19 vaccine: a neutrosophic MCDM approach for determining the priority groups. Results Phys. 2021;20:103654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103654
- Chowdhury R, Heng K, Shawon MSR, et al. Dynamic interventions to control COVID-19 pandemic: a multivariate prediction modelling study comparing 16 worldwide countries. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(5):389–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00649-w
- Karuppiah K, Sankaranarayanan B, Ali SM. A fuzzy ANP–DEMATEL model on faulty behavior risks: implications for improving safety in the workplace. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020:1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10803-548.2020.1847486
- Gharedaghi G, Omidvari M. A pattern of contractor selection for oil and gas industries in a safety approach using ANP–DEMATEL in a Grey environment. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;25(4):510–523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1396047
- Agarski B, Hadzistevic M, Budak I, et al. Comparison of approaches to weighting of multiple criteria for selecting equipment to optimize performance and safety. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;25(2):228–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1341126
- Abbasi S, Gilani N, Javanmardi M, et al. Prioritizing the indicators influencing the permit to work system efficiency based on analytic etwork process. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020:1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2020.1760526
- Khan NZ, Shihab SK, Attri R, et al. Prioritization of lower back pain risk factors among industrial workers using the best–worst method. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021;27(2):544–551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2019.1600303
- Garzillo EM, Monaco MGL, Spacone A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 emergency in the workplace: are companies ready to protect their workers? A cross-sectional survey. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020:1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2020.1810457
- Bo Y, Guo C, Lin C, et al. Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in 190 countries from 23 January to 13 April 2020. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;102:247–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.066
- Samanlioglu F, Kaya BE. Evaluation of the COVID-19 pandemic intervention strategies with hesitant F-AHP. J Healthc Eng. 2020;2020:8835258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8835258
- Cho SW. Quantifying the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: the case of Sweden. Economet J. 2020;23(3):323–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaa025
- Imai N, Gaythorpe KA, Abbott S, et al. Adoption and impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:59. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15808.1
- Haug N, Geyrhofer L, Londei A, et al. Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4:1303–1312. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-01009-0 doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0
- Gul M. Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: the case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and coloring unit. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(4):705–718. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1492251
- Yager R. Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst. 2014;22(4):958–965. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
- Karasan A, Ilbahar E, Cebi S, et al. A new risk assessment approach: safety and critical effect analysis (SCEA) and its extension with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Saf. Sci. 2018;108:173–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.031
- Wan S P, Li S Q, Dong J Y. A three-phase method for Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making and application to haze management. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;123:348–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.005
- Ak M F, Gul M. AHP–TOPSIS integration extended with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for information security risk analysis. Complex Intell Syst. 2019;5(2):113–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-018-0087-7
- Gul M, Ak MF. A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;196:653–664. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.106
- Ozdemir Y, Gul M. Measuring development levels of NUTS-2 regions in Turkey based on capabilities approach and multi-criteria decision-making. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;128:150–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.035
- Haktanır E, Kahraman C. A novel interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy QFD method and its application to solar photovoltaic technology development. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;132:361–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.022
- Zhang X, Xu Z. Extension of topsis to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intel Syst. 2014;29:1061–1078. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676
- Dağdeviren M, Yavuz S, Kılınç N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Exp Sys with App. 2009;36:8143–8151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
- Saaty TL. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Euro J Oper Res. 1990;48:9–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
- Kim PP, Lee KJ, Lee BW. Selection of an optimal nuclear fuel cycle scenario by goal programming and the analytic hierarchy process. Ann Nucl Energy. 1999;26:449–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(98)00081-4
- llbahar E, Karaşan A, Cebi S, et al. A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Saf Sci. 2018;103:124–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025
- Karasan A, Ilbahar E, Kahraman C. A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and its application to landfill site selection problem. Soft Comput. 2019;23(21):10953–10968. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3649-0
- Yücesan M, Kahraman G. Risk evaluation and prevention in hydro-power plant operations: a model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP. Energy Policy. 2019;126:343–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.039
- Kaya A, Çiçekalan B, Çebi F. Location selection for WEEE recycling plant by using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2020;38(1):1097–1106. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179471
- Yildiz A, Ayyildiz E, Gumus AT, et al. A Modified balanced scorecard based hybrid Pythagorean fuzzy AHP–topsis methodology for ATM site selection problem. Int J Inf Tech Decis. 2020;19(2):365–384. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020500017
- Ren P, Xu Z, Gou X. Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput. 2016;42:246–259. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.020
- Büyüközkan G, Göçer F. Assessment of additive manufacturing technology by Pythagorean fuzzy CODAS. In International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. Springer, Cham; 2019. Pp. 959–968. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_114
- Rani P, Mishra AR, Pardasani KR, et al. A novel VIKOR approach based on entropy and divergence measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets to evaluate renewable energy technologies in India. J Clean Prod. 2019;238:117936. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117936
- Gul M, Ak MF, Guneri AF. Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR-based approach for safety risk assessment in mine industry. J Safety Res. 2019;69:135–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.005
- Rani P, Mishra AR, Mardani A, et al. Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR framework for performance evaluation of solar panel selection. Sustainability. 2020;12(10):4278. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104278
- Seker S, Aydin N. Hydrogen production facility location selection for Black Sea using entropy based TOPSIS under IVPF environment. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2020;45(32):15855–15868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.183
- Preparedness, prevention and control of COVID-19 in prisons and other places of detention. www.euro.who.int/en [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; [cited 2020 Dec 19]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-determinants/prisons-and-health/publications/2020/preparedness,-prevention-and-control-of-covid-19-in-prisons-and-other-places-of-detention,-15-march-2020-prod-uced-by-whoeurope
- Frequently asked questions about prevention and control of COVID-19 in prisons and other places of detention (produced by WHO/Europe). www.euro.who.int/en [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; [cited 2020 Dec 19]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/publications-and-technical-guidance/infection-prevention-and-control/frequently-asked-questions-about-prevention-and-control-of-covid-19-in-prisons-and-other-places-of-detention-produced-by-whoeurope
- covid19.saglik.gov.tr [Internet]. Covid-19 information page. Ankara: Republıc of Turkey Mınıstry; [cited 2020 Dec 20]. Turkish. Available from: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66393/covid-19-salgin-yonet-imi-ve-calisma-rehberi.html
- covid19.saglik.gov.tr [Internet]. Covid-19 informatıon page Ankara: Republıc of Turkey Mınıstry; [cited 2020 Dec 20]. Turkish. Available from https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66300/covid-19-nedir-.html
- Mardani A, Saraji MK, Mishra AR, et al. A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak. Appl Soft Comput. 2020;96:106613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106613
- Islam MN, Islam AN. A systematic review of the digital interventions for fighting COVID-19: the Bangladesh perspective. IEEE Access. 2020;8:114078–114087. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002445