When work support does not work: investigating the joint moderating effect of challenge stressors and hindrance stressors on safety compliance

References

• Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate: safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(4):946–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfering A, Semmer NK, Grebner S. Work stress and patient safety: observer-rated work stressors as predictors of characteristics of safety-related events reported by young nurses. Ergonomics. 2006;49(5–6):457–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahid SS, Polk Jr HC, Lewis JN, et al. Opportunities for improved performance in surgical specialty practice. Ann Surg. 2008;247(2):380–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson ES, Rogers ML, Chapman RJ, et al. Compliance with intended use of bar code medication administration in acute and long-term care: an observational study. Hum Factors. 2006;48(1):15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks DW, Lally KP, Carrick MM, et al. Compliance with guidelines to prevent surgical site infections: as simple as 1–2–3? Am J Surg. 2011;201(1):76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekele T, Ashenaf T, Ermias A, et al. Compliance with standard safety precautions and associated factors among health care workers in Hawassa University comprehensive, specialized hospital, southern Ethiopia. Plos One. 2020;15(10):1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enwereuzor IK, Adeyemi BA, Onyishi IE. Trust in leader as a pathway between ethical leadership and safety compliance. Leader Health Serv. 2020;33(2):201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Griffin M, Yeo GB, et al. A new look at compliance with work procedures: an engagement perspective. Safety Sci. 2018;105:46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Jiang L, Yao X, et al. Job demands, job resources and safety outcomes: the roles of emotional exhaustion and safety compliance. Acc Anal Prev. 2013;51:243–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puah LN, Ong LD, Chong W. The effects of perceived organizational support: perceived supervisor support and perceived co-worker support on safety and health compliance. Int J Occup Saf Ergo. 2016;22:333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands–resources model: state of the art. J Manage Psychol. 2007;22(3):309–328.
   Google Scholar
• Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, et al. The job demands–resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):499–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands: job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(1):71–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner N, Stride CB, Carter AJ, et al. Job demands–control–support model and employee safety performance. Acc Anal Prev. 2012;45:811–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E, de Boer E, et al. Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. J Vocat Behav. 2003;62:341–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran PJ, Bauer DJ. The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62(1):583–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindek S, Arvan ML, Spector PE. The stressor–strain relationship in diary studies: a meta-analysis of the within and between levels. Work Stress. 2019;33(1):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh MA, Boswell WR, Roehling MV, et al. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(1):65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasek RA. Job demands: job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Quart. 1979;24:285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadić M, Bakker AB, Oerlemans W. Challenge versus hindrance job demands and well-being: a diary study on the moderating role of job resources. J Occup Organ Psych. 2015;88(4):702–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Bu Q, Wee S. Effect of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: moderating role of job stressors. Int J Stress Manage. 2016;23(4):400–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern M, Heissler C, Zapf D. Social job stressors can foster employee well-being: introducing the concept of social challenge stressors. J Bus Psychol. 2021;36:771–792. doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09702-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JC, Edwards BD, Arnold T, et al. Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(1):254–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Woerkom M, Bakker AB, Nishii LH. Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: fine-tuning the job demands–resources model using conservation of resources theory. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101(1):141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman WC, Motowildo SJ. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: N Schmitt, WF Borman, Associates, editors. Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993. p. 71–98.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance: knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psych. 2000;5(3):347–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pessoa-Silva CL, Dharan S, Hugonnet S, et al. Dynamics of bacterial hand contamination during routine neonatal care. Infect Cont Hosp Ep. 2004;25(3):192–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst B. Behaving safely under pressure: the effects of job demands, resources, and safety climate on employee physical and psychosocial safety behavior. J Safety Res. 2015;55:63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CF, Chen SC. Investigating the effects of job demands and job resources on cabin crew safety behaviors. Tourism Manage. 2014;41:45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Verbeke W. Using the job demands–resources model to predict burnout and performance. Hum Resour Manage-US. 2004;43(1):83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducharme LJ, Martin JK. Unrewarding work, coworker support, and job satisfaction: a test of the buffering hypothesis. Work Occupation. 2000;27(2):223–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran C, Sanchez JI, Fisher J. The role of social support in the process of work stress: a meta-analysis. J Vocat Behav. 1999;54(2):314–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Euwema MC. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. J Occup Health Psych. 2005;10(2):170–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, et al. The role of personal resources in the job demands–resources model. Int J Stress Manage. 2007;14(2):121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Breevaart K, Bakker AB. Daily job demands and employee work engagement: the role of daily transformational leadership behavior. J Occup Health Psych. 2018;23(3):338–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl Psychol-Int Rev. 2001;50(3):337–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev Gen Psychol. 2002;6(4):307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Hakanen JJ, Demerouti E, et al. Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. J Educ Psychol. 2007;99(2):274–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakanen JJ, Bakker AB, Demerouti E. How dentists cope with their job demands and stay engaged: the moderating role of job resources. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(6):479–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper CL, Dewe PJ, O’Driscoll MP. Organizational stress: a review and critique of theory, research, and applications. Thousands Oaks (CA): Sage; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lepine JA, Podsakoff NP, Lepine MA. A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: an explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Acad Manage J. 2005;48(8):764–775.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lepine JA, Buckman BR, et al. It's not fair. or is it? The role of justice and leadership in explaining work stressor–job performance relationships. Acad Manage J. 2014;57(3):675–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzola JJ, Disselhorst R. Should we be “challenging” employees?: A critical review and meta-analysis of the challenge–hindrance model of stress. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(8):949–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmer PS, Semmer NK, Kälin W, et al. The ambivalence of challenge stressors: time pressure associated with both negative and positive well-being. J Vocat Behav. 2012;80(2):422–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepine JA, Lepine MA, Jackson CL. Challenge and hindrance stress: relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(5):883–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsall MJ, Ellis A, Stein JH. Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organ Behav Hum. Dec. 2009;109(1):18–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher CD, To ML. Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(7):865–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe KO, Mack L, Fleeson W. A guide for data cleaning in experience sampling studies. In: MR Mehl, TS Connor, editors. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2012: 321-338.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: HC Triandis, editor. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 1980. p. 349–444.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Li Y, Lin J. Linking challenge and hindrance stress to safety performance: the moderating effect of core self-evaluation. Pers Indiv Differ. 2014;68:154–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Maas CJM, Hox JJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodol. 2004;1(3):86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Scherbaum CA, Ferreter JM. Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organ Res Methods. 2009;12(2):347–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas CJ, Hox JJ. The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors. Comput Stat Data An. 2004;46(3):427–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole MA, O’Farrell PN. The assumptions of the linear regression model. T I Brit Geogr. 1971;52:145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale (MI): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann SA, Griffin MA, Gavin MB. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In: K Klein, S Kozlowski, editors. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000. p. 467–511.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder MA, Lander J, Levine-Silverman S. Diagnosing and dealing with multicollinearity. Western J Nurs Res. 1990;12(2):175–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen OK, Hetland J, Matthiesen SB, et al. Passive avoidant leadership and safety non-compliance: a 30 days diary study among naval cadets. Safety Sci. 2021;138: Article ID(105100), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niessen C, Sonnentag S, Sach F. Thriving at work – a diary study. J Organ Behav. 2011;33:468–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prem R, Ohly S, Kubicek B, et al. Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(1):108–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar