1,380
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Relationship between heat loss indexes and physiological indicators of turnout-related heat strain in mild and hot environments

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &

References

  • Cheung SS, Petersen SR, McLellan TM. Physiological strain and countermeasures with firefighting: physiology of firefighting. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20:103–116.
  • Smith DL, Barr DA, Kales SN. Extreme sacrifice: sudden cardiac death in the US fire service. Extrem Physiol Med. 2013;2(1):1–9.
  • Barker R, Fang X, Deaton AS, et al. Identifying factors that contribute to structural firefighter heat strain in North America. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.1987024
  • National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2018. Standard on protective ensembles for structural fire fighting and proximity fire fighting. Quincy (MA): NFPA. Standard No. NFPA 1971:2018.
  • Gao H, Deaton AS, Fang X, et al. Effects of environmental temperature and humidity on evaporative heat loss through firefighter suit materials made with semi-permeable and microporous moisture barriers. Text Res J. 2022;92(1-2):219–231.
  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2017.Standard test method for thermal and evaporative resistance of clothing materials using a sweating hot plate. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM. Standard No. ASTM F1868:2017.
  • Barker RL. A review of gaps and limitations in test methods for first responder protective clothing and equipment: a final report presented to National Personal Protection Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Pittsburgh (PA): National Personal Protection Technology Laboratory; 2005.
  • Stull J, Duffy R. Field evaluation of protective clothing effects on fire fighter physiology: predictive capability of total heat loss test. In: Nelson C, Henry N, editors. Performance of protective clothing: issues and priorities for the 21st century. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2000. p. 481-503.
  • Myhre L, Barker R, Scruggs B, et al. Effect of measured heat loss through turnout materials on firefighter comfort and heat stress. Part II: performance in a warm environment. In: Nelson C, Henry N, editors. Performance of protective clothing: issues and priorities for the 21st century. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2000. p. 535-545.
  • Barker R, Myhre L, Scruggs B, et al. Effect of measured heat loss through turnout materials on firefighter comfort and heat stress. Part I: performance in a mild environment. In: Nelson C, Henry N, editors. Performance of protective clothing: issues and priorities for the 21st century. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2000. p. 519-534.
  • DenHartog E, Fang X, Deaton A. Effects of total heat loss versus evaporative resistance of firefighter garments in a physiological heat strain trial. In: Lehtonen K, Shiels B, Ormond R, editors. Performance of protective clothing and equipment: 11th volume, innovative solutions to evolving challenges. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2020. p. 204–221.
  • Burke R, Blood K, Deaton AS, et al. Application of model-controlled manikin to predict human physiological response in firefighter turnout gear. In: Burke R, Heiss D, Misius J, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting for Thermal Manikin and Modeling (8I3M). Victoria, BC, Canada : 2010 Aug 22–26. p. 1–5.
  • Deaton AS, Watson K, DenHartog E, et al. Effectiveness of using a thermal sweating manikin coupled with a thermoregulation model to predict human physiological response to different firefighter turnout suits. In: Lehtonen K, Shiels B, Ormond R, editors. Performance of protective clothing and equipment: 11th volume, innovative solutions to evolving challenges. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2020. p. 222–236.
  • Wang F. Physiological model controlled sweating thermal manikin: can it replace human subjects. J Ergon. 2011;1(1):e103.
  • McQuerry M, Barker R, DenHartog E. Relationship between novel design modifications and heat stress relief in structural firefighters’ protective clothing. Appl Ergon. 2018;70:260–268.
  • Smith DL, DeBlois JP, Kales SN, et al. Cardiovascular strain of firefighting and the risk of sudden cardiac events. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2016;44(3):90–97.
  • Parsons KC. Human thermal comfort. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2019.
  • Fiala D, Lomas KJ, Stohrer M. A computer model of human thermoregulation for a wide range of environmental conditions: the passive system. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87(5):1957–1972.
  • Fiala D, Lomas KJ, Stohrer M. Computer prediction of human thermoregulatory and temperature responses to a wide range of environmental conditions. Int J Biometeorol. 2001;45(3):143–159.
  • Wilson TE, Crandall CG. Effect of thermal stress on cardiac function. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2011;39(1):12–17.
  • Crandall CG, Wilson TE. Human cardiovascular responses to passive heat stress. Compr Physiol. 2015;5(1):17–43.
  • Damato AN, Lau SH, Stein E, et al. Cardiovascular response to acute thermal stress (hot dry environment) in unacclimatized normal subjects. Am Heart J. 1968;76(6):769–774.
  • Montain SJ, Sawka MN, Cadarette BS, et al. Physiological tolerance to uncompensable heat stress: effects of exercise intensity, protective clothing, and climate. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77(1):216–222.
  • Gao H, Deaton AS, Fang X, et al. Effects of outer shell fabric color, smoke contamination, and washing on heat loss through turnout suit systems. Text Res J. 2022. doi:10.1177/00405175211073353
  • Morris CE, Gonzales RG, Hodgson MJ, et al. Actual and simulated weather data to evaluate wet bulb globe temperature and heat index as alerts for occupational heat-related illness. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019;16(1):54-65.