Comparison of ConsExpo estimated exposure levels to glycol ethers during professional cleaning work to existing regulatory occupational exposure limit values

References

• Folletti I, Zock JP, Moscato G, et al. Asthma and rhinitis in cleaning workers: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. J Asthma. 2014;51:18–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaya D, Mirabelli MC, Anto JM, et al. Workforce-based study of occupational exposures and asthma symptoms in cleaning workers. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(12):914–919. doi:10.1136/oem.2010.063271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arif AA, Hughes PC, Delclos GL. Occupational exposures among domestic and industrial professional cleaners. Occupational Medicine. 2008;58:458–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaakkola J, Jaakkola MS. Professional cleaning and asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;6(2):85–90. doi:10.1097/01.all.0000216849.64828.55 PMID: 16520670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen A, Martikainen R, Karjalainen J, et al. Excess incidences of asthma among Finnish cleaners employed in different industries. Eur Respir J. 2002;19:90–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arif AA, Delclos GL. Association between cleaning-related chemicals and work-related asthma and asthma symptoms among healthcare professionals. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(1):35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delclos GL, Gimeno D, Arif AA, et al. Occupational risk factors and asthma among health care professionals. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(7):667–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirabelli MC, Zock JP, Plana E, et al. Occupational risk factors for asthma among nurses and related healthcare professionals in an international study. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(7):474–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siracusa A, De Blay F, Folletti I, et al. Asthma and exposure to cleaning products – a European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology task force consensus statement. Allergy. 2013;68:1532–1545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanes Ø, Bertelsen RJ, Lygre SHL, et al. Cleaning at home and at work in relation to lung function decline and airway obstruction. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2018;197(9):1157–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerster FM, Vernez D, Wild PP, et al. Hazardous substances in frequently used professional cleaning products. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2014;20(1):46–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello A, Quinn MM, Perry MJ, et al. Characterisation of occupational exposures to cleaning products used for common cleaning tasks – a pilot study of hospital cleaners. Environ Health. 2009;27(8):11.
   Google Scholar
• Suleiman A, Svendsen KH. Are safety data sheets for cleaning products used in Norway a factor contributing to the risk of workers exposure to chemicals? International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2014;27(5):840–853. doi:10.2478/s13382-014-0302-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoué J, Bégin D, Gérin M. Technical, occupational health and environmental aspects of metal degreasing with aqueous cleaners. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003;47(6):441–459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pastor-Belda M, Campillo N, Hernández-Córdoba M, et al. Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry for the quantification of ethylene glycol ethers in different household cleaning products. Journal of Separation Science. 2016;39(12):2292–2299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerster FM, Hopf NB, Wild PP, et al. Airborne exposures to monoethanolamine, glycol ethers, and benzyl alcohol during professional cleaning: a pilot study. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2014;58(7):846–859.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berthet A, Oltramare C, Spring P, et al. Human skin permeation rates ex vivo following exposures to mixtures of glycol ethers. Toxicology Letters. 2020;335:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen PA, Frederiksen M, Sejbæk CS, et al. Chemicals inhaled from spray cleaning and disinfection products and their respiratory effects. A comprehensive review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2020;229:113592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayati M, Vu DC, Vo PH, et al. Health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds at daycare facilities. Indoor Air. 2021(4):977–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruokolainen J, Hyttinen M. Cleaning workers’ exposure to volatile organic compounds and particulate matter during floor polish removal and reapplication. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2019(10):685–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virji MA, Liang X, Su FC, et al. Peaks, means, and determinants of real-time TVOC exposures associated with cleaning and disinfecting tasks in healthcare settings. Annals of Work Exposures and Health. 2019;63(7):759–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su FC, Friesen MC, Stefaniak AB, et al. Exposures to volatile organic compounds among healthcare workers: modeling the effects of cleaning tasks and product use. Ann Work Expo Health. 2018;62(7):852–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito R, Virji MA, Henneberger PK, et al. Characterisation of cleaning and disinfecting tasks and product use among hospital occupations. Am J Ind Med. 2015;58(1):101–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello A, Quinn MM, Milton DK, et al. Determinants of exposure to 2-butoxyethanol from cleaning tasks: a quasi-experimental study. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;3(57):125–135.
   Google Scholar
• Bello A, Quinn MM, Perry MJ, et al. Quantitative assessment of airborne exposures generated during common cleaning tasks: a pilot study. Environ Health. 2010;9(76):1–10. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawakami T, Isama K, Tanaka-Kagawa T, et al. Analysis of glycols, glycol ethers, and other volatile organic compounds present in household water-based hand pump sprays. J Environ Sci Health part A – Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2017;52(13):1204–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Schmidbauer N, Spengler J, et al. Sources of propylene glycol and glycol ethers in air at home. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010;7(12):4213–4237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer BC, Destaillats H, Hodgson AT, et al. Cleaning products and air fresheners: emissions and resulting concentrations of glycol ethers and terpenoids. Indoor Air. 2006;16(3):179–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz M, Price P, Hamilton J, et al. Modeling aggregate exposures to glycol ethers from use of commercial floor products. Int J Toxicol. 2006;25(2):95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Cao XL, Beauchamp R. Determination of 2-butoxyethanol emissions from selected consumer products and its application in assessment of inhalation exposure associated with cleaning tasks. Environ Int. 2001;26:589–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters M, McKernan L, Maier A, et al. Exposure estimation and interpretation of occupational risk: enhanced information for the occupational risk manager. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2015;12(1):99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Money CD, Jacobi S, Penman MG, et al. The ECETOC approach to targeted risk assessment; lessons and experiences relevant to REACH. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2007;17(Suppl 1):67–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marquart H, Heussen H, Le Feber M, et al. ‘Stoffenmanager’, a Web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2008;52(3):429–441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fransman W, Van Tongeren M, Cherrie JW, et al. Advanced REACH Tool (ART): development of the mechanistic model. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2011;55:957–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrie JW, Fransman W, Heussen GAH, et al. Exposure models for REACH and occupational safety and health regulations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:383. doi:10.3390/ijerph17020383
   Google Scholar
• Balsat A, De Graeve J, Mairiaux P. A structured strategy for assessing chemical risks suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2003;47(7):549–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping MD, Williams CR, Devine JM. Industry's perception and use of occupational exposure limits. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 1998;42:357–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECHA. CL inventory [Internet]; [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-database
   Google Scholar
• ILO. International chemicals safety cards (ICSC) [Internet]; [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/icsc/showcard.home
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, RVIM. ConsExpo [Internet]; 2011 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/en/consexpo
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, RVIM. ConsExpo Web [Internet]; 2011 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/en/consexpo/consexpoweb
   Google Scholar
• Delmaar C, Park MVDZ, van Engelen JMN. ConsExpo: consumer exposure and uptake models – program manual [Internet]. RVIM; 2006 [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27451637_ConsExpo_-_Consumer_Exposure_and_Uptake_Models_-Program_Manual
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Public Health and the Environment: RVIM. ConsExpo Web: consumer exposure models model documentation. Update for ConsExpo Web 1.0.2. [Internet]; 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/2017-0197.pdf doi:10.21945/RIVM-2017-0197.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM. Cleaning products fact sheet default parameters for estimating consumer exposure – updated version [Internet]; 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/2016-0179.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel J, Fransman W, Heussen H, et al. Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(2):125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedmann RA, Gasic B, Vernez D. Sensitivity analysis, dominant factors, and robustness of the ECETOC TRA v3, Stoffenmanager 4.5, and ART 1.5 occupational exposure models. Risk Analysis. 2015;35(2):211–225. doi:10.1111/risa.12286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECHA. A thought starter on how to better regulate professional users border-lining with industrial and consumer users under REACH restriction (Restriction Task Force). Document to CARACAL-37 meeting [Internet]; 2020 [cited 2021 May 12]. Available from: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13641/rtf_professional_users_borderlining_ind_cons_users_en.pdf/2909fae5-c389-53ae-e751-f61fab21cf55
   Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Authority (HSA). Dermal exposure [Internet]; 2010 [cited 2022 Feb 24]. Available from: https://www.hsa.ie/eng/Publications_and_Forms/Publications/Chemical_and_Hazardous_Substances/Dermal%20Exposure%20Information%20Sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA. EU Commission, ECHA, Joint Task Force ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) on scientific aspects and methodologies related to the exposure of chemicals at the workplace [Internet]; 2017 [cited 2022 Feb 24]. Available from: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13579/rac_joint_scoel_opinion_en.pdf/58265b74-7177-caf7-2937-c7c520768216
   Google Scholar