Influence of human factors on risk associated with pressure equipment

References

• American Petroleum Institute - Risk Based Inspection. Basic resource document: API-581. New York (NY): American Petroleum Institute; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi O, Mortazavi SB, Asilian Mahabadi H. Application and modification of the tripod beta method for analyzing the causes of oil and gas industry accidents. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Feb 22;27(3): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camossi E, Giannini F, Monti M, et al. Ontology driven certification of pressure equipments. Process Saf Prog. 2008;27(4):313–322. doi:10.1002/prs.10277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golubović T, Sedmak A, Spasojević Brkić V, et al. Novel risk based assessment of pressure vessels integrity. Tehnički Vjesnik. 2018;25(3):803–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behari N. Assessing process safety culture maturity for specialty gas operations: a case study. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019;123(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.12.012
   Google Scholar
• Jovanovic A. Overview of RIMAP project and its deliverables in the area of power plants. Int J Press Vessel Pip INT J PRES VES PIP. 2004;81(10):815–824. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golubovic T, Sedmak A, Brkic VS, et al. Welded joints as critical regions in pressure vessels – case study of vinyl-chloride monomer storage tank. Hemijska industrija. 2018;72(4):177–182. doi:10.2298/HEMIND171009006G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marhavilas PK, Koulouriotis D, Gemeni V. Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2011;24(5):477–523. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin MT, Khan F, Amyotte P. A bibliometric review of process safety and risk analysis. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019;126:366–381. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2019.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini N, Givehchi S, Maknoon R. Cost-based fire risk assessment in natural gas industry by means of fuzzy FTA and ETA. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2020;63:104025. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.104025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi M, Kabir S. Fuzzy evidence theory and Bayesian networks for process systems risk analysis. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2020;26(1):57–86. doi:10.1080/10807039.2018.1493679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivolianitou Z, Konstandinidou M, Michalis C. Statistical analysis of major accidents in petrochemical industry notified to the major accident reporting system (MARS). J Hazard Mater. 2006;137(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.12.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate-Cornell ME, Murphy DM. Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: the SAM approach and observations from recent applications. Reliab Eng Syst. 1996;53(2):115–126. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(96)00040-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan X, Wu Z. Performance shaping factors in the human error probability modification of human reliability analysis. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Jul 2;26(3):538–550. doi:10.1080/10803548.2018.1498655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwankwo CD, Arewa AO, Theophilus SC, et al. Analysis of accidents caused by human factors in the oil and gas industry using the HFACS-OGI framework. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021 May 27: 1–13. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.1916238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W. An application of human factors analysis and classification system to identify organizational factors in maritime accidents [doctoral disseratation]. World Maritime University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn JO. The meaning of risk-taking – key concepts and dimensions. J Risk Res. 2019;22(1):1–15. doi:10.1080/13669877.2017.1351465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milazzo MF, Bragatto P. A framework addressing a safe ageing management in complex industrial sites: the Italian experience in ‘Seveso’ establishments. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2019;58:70–81. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1):215–257. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalves Filho AP, Waterson P. Maturity models and safety culture: a critical review. Saf Sci. 2018;105:192–211. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns K, Whitaker SM, Flin R. Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Saf Sci. 2003;41(8):641–680. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00011-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glendon AI, Stanton NA. Perspectives on safety culture. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1):193–214. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H. The influence of safety-specific transformational leadership and high-quality relationships on mindful safety practices through safety climate: a study in Chinese petroleum industry. J Appl Secur Res. 2020;1:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hu J, Zhang L, Wang Q, et al. An assessment methodology for human holistic risk in whole cycle of shale gas fracturing. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2018;24(1):271–290. doi:10.1080/10807039.2017.1380512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohaghegh Z, Mosleh A. Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment of complex socio-technical systems: principles and theoretical foundations. Saf Sci. 2009;47(8):1139–1158. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwankwo CD, Theophilus SC, Arewa AO. A comparative analysis of process safety management (PSM) systems in the process industry.J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2020;66:1–28. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragatto P, Vairo T, Milazzo MF, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the safety management in Italian Seveso industries.J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2021: 104393. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasangohar F, Moats J, Mehta R, Peres SC. Disaster ergonomics: human factors in COVID-19 pandemic emergency management. Human Factors. 2020;62(7):1061–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Corporate governance for process safety: guidance for senior leaders in high hazard industries. Paris: OECD; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bourassa D, Gauthier F, Abdul-Nour G. Equipment failures and their contribution to industrial incidents and accidents in the manufacturing industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):131–141. doi:10.1080/10803548.2015.1116814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson M. Behavioural safety and major accident hazards: magic bullet or shot in the dark? Process Saf Environ Prot. 2005;83(2):109–116. doi:10.1205/psep.04230
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins A. Lessons from Esso’s gas plant explosion at Longford. In: Lessons from disasters: seminar notes. Sydney: Institution of Engineers; 2010, p. 184.
   Google Scholar
• Swuste P, Groeneweg J, Van Gulijk C, et al. Safety management systems from Three Mile Island to Piper Alpha, a review in English and Dutch literature for the period 1979 to 1988. Saf Sci. 2018;107:224–244. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltedal HA, McArthur DP. Reporting practices in merchant shipping, and the identification of influencing factors. Saf Sci. 2011;49(2):331–338. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin TR, Tracey JB, Enz CA. Scale construction: developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. J Hosp Tour Res. 1997;21(1):100–120. doi:10.1177/109634809702100108
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. PMPH-USA (BC Decker). 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hoe SL. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. J Quant Met. 2008;3(1):76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D. Structural equations modeling: fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. J Consum Psychol. 2010;20(1):90–98. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulaik SA, James LR, Van Alstine J, et al. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol Bull. 1989;105(3):430–445. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedny GZ, Harris SR. Safety and reliability analysis methods based on systemic-structural activity theory. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O: J Risk and Reliab. 2013 Oct;227(5):549–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedri A. Effects of remedial actions on small piping reliability. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O: J Risk and Reliab. 2013 Apr;227(2):144–161.
   Google Scholar
• Golubović T, Spasojević Brkić V, Perišić M, et al. Differences in attitudes of operators and managers on risk management of pressure equipment. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.1937795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar