Evolution of the biomechanical dimension of the professional gestures of grinders when using a collaborative robot

References

• Buckle P-W., Devereux J. The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergonomics. 2002;33(3):207–217. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00014-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté J, Ngomo S, Stock S, et al. Quebec research on work-related musculoskeletal disorders: deeper understanding for better prevention. Industrial Relations. 2013;68(4):643–660. doi:10.7202/1023009ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ. Hand–wrist cumulative trauma disorders in industry. Br J Industrial Medicine. 1986;43(11):779–784.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NIOSH. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors – a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. Cincinnati: United States Department of Health and Human Services; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran N, Pande SS, Ramakrishnan N. The role of deburring in manufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. J Mater Process Technol. 1994;44(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/0924-0136(94)90033-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odum K, Castillo MC, Das J, et al. Sustainability analysis of grinding with power tools. Procedia CIRP. 2014;14:570–574. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.011
   Google Scholar
• Vasselin A, Wioland L. L’utilisateur au centre d’une approche multidisciplinaire en conception: exemple des machines portatives [The user at the centre of a multidisciplinary approach to design: the example of portable machines]. Paper presented at: 42th Congrès de la Société d’Ergonomie de Langue Française; 2007 Sep 5–7; St Malo. French.
   Google Scholar
• Bigliardi B, Bottani E, Casella G. Enabling technologies, application areas and impact of Industry 4.0: a bibliographic analysis. Procedia Manuf. 2020;42:322–326. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.086
   Google Scholar
• Bahrin MAK, Othman MF, Nor NH. Industry 4.0: a review on industrial automation and robotic. J Teknol. 2016;2180(3722):137–143.
   Google Scholar
• William MD. Industrie 4.0 – smart manufacturing for the future. Berlin: Ger Trade & Invest; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Neugebauer R, Hippmann S, Leis M, et al. Industrie 4.0 – from the perspective of applied research. Procedia CIRP. 2016;57:2–7. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya S, Ambad P, Bhosle S. Industry 4.0 – a glimpse. Procedia Manuf. 2018;20:233–238. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034
   Google Scholar
• Peshkin M, Colgate JE. Cobots. Industrial Robot. 1999;26(5):335–341. doi:10.1108/01439919910283722
   Google Scholar
• Atain-Kouadio J-J, Sghaier A. Les robots et dispositifs d’assistance physique: était des lieux et enjeux pour la prévention [Robots and physical assistance devices: state of play and challenges for prevention]. NST. 2017;354, 48p. French.
   Google Scholar
• Jocelyn S, Burlet-Vienney D, Giraud L, et al. Robotique collaborative: évaluation des fonctions de sécurité et retour d’expérience des travailleurs, utilisateurs et intégrateurs au Québec [Collaborative Robotics: Assessment of Safety Functions and Feedback from Workers, Users and Integrators in Quebec]. Montréal: IRSST; 2017. French.
   Google Scholar
• Maurice P, Measson Y, Padois V, et al. Assessment of physical exposure to musculoskeletal risks in collaborative robotics using dynamic simulation. Robot des, dyn and control. 2013;544:325–332.
   Google Scholar
• Maurice P, Padois V, Measson Y, et al. Human-oriented design of collaborative robots. Int J Industrial Ergonomics. 2017;57:88–102. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2016.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroly S, Simonet P, Vézina N. Operational leeway and power to act in the prevention of repetitive strain injury and occupational stress. Le trav hum. 2015;78(1):1–8. doi:10.3917/th.781.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois F, Lemarchang C, Hubault F, et al. Troubles musculosquelettiques et travail: quand la santé interroge l’organisation [Musculoskeletal disorders and work: when health questions the organisation]. Lyon: ANACT; 2006. French.
   Google Scholar
• Vézina N. La pratique de l’ergonomie face aux TMS: ouverture à l’interdisciplinarité [Ergonomics practice front of MSDs: opening up to interdisciplinarity]. In: Société d'Ergonomie de la Langue Francaise - Association Canadienne d'Ergonomie (SELF-ACE); Montréal, Québec; 2001. p. 44–60.
   Google Scholar
• Clot Y, Fernandez G. Analyse psychologique du mouvement: apport à la compréhension des TMS [Psychological analysis of movement: contribution to the understanding of MSDs]. Activités. 2005;2(2):68–78. French.
   Google Scholar
• Schoose C, Caroly S, Cuny-Guerrier A, et al. Analyse des représentations suite à l’introduction d’un robot d’assistance physique dans un objectif de prévention des TMS [Analysis of representations following the introduction of a physical assistance robot with the aim of MSD prevention]. Paper presented at: 55th Congrès de la Société d’Ergonomie de Langue Française; 2021 Jan 12–13; Paris. French
   Google Scholar
• Schoose C, Caroly S, Cuny-Guerrier A, et al. Worker’s strategies analysis to prevent musculoskeletal disorders: the case of deburrers in the foundry sector. Poster session presented at: 10th International Scientific Conference on the Prevention of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders PREMUS; 2019 Sep 2–5; Bologne.
   Google Scholar
• Schoose C, Caroly S, Cuny-Guerrier A, et al. L’analyse des gestes professionnels dans le secteur de la fonderie: le cas des ébarbeurs [Professional gestures analysis in the foundry sector: the case of deburrers]. Paper presented at: 54th Congrès de la Société d'Ergonomie de Langue Française; 2019 Sep 25–27; Tours. French.
   Google Scholar
• Varghese MA, Saha PN, Atreya N. A rapid appraisal of occupational workload from a modified scale of perceived exertion. Ergonomics. 1994;37(3):485–491. doi:10.1080/00140139408963665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French Association for Standardization (AFNOR). NF EN 1005-4+A1 – safety of machinery – human physical performance – evaluation of working postures and movements in relation to machinery. Paris: AFNOR; 2008. Standard No. EN 1005-4+A1:2008.
   Google Scholar
• McAtamney L, Nigel Corlett E. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergonomics. 1993;24(2):91–99. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atain-Kouadio J-J, Sghaier A, Picot D, editors. Les robots d’assistance physique: fonctionnement, utilisation en industrie et enjeux santé et sécurité au travail [Physicial assistance robots: operation, use in industry and occupational health and safety issues]. In: Actes du 50ème congrès international de la Société d’Ergonomie de Langue Française; 2015 Sep 23–25; Paris. French.
   Google Scholar
• Luttmann A, Jäger M, Griefahn B, et al. Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. World Health Organ. 2003;5:32.
   Google Scholar
• Rabardel P, Carlin N, Chesnaisn M, et al. Ergonomie concepts et méthodes [Ergonomics concepts and methods]. Toulouse: Octares; 1998. French.
   Google Scholar
• Aptel M, Cnockaert J. Liens entre les troubles musculo-squelettiques du membre supérieur (TMS-MS) [Links between upper limb musculoskeletal disorders]. BTS Newsletter. 2002;19–20:57–63. French.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois F, Hubault F. Prévenir les TMS: de la biomécanique à la revalorisation du travail, l’analyse du geste dans toutes ses dimensions [Preventing MSDs: from biomechanics to revaluation of work, gesture analysis in all its dimensions]. Activités. 2005;2(1):20–36. French.
   Google Scholar