When and for whom organizational identification is more effective in eliciting safety voice: an empirical study from the construction industry perspective

References

• Noort MC, Reader TW, Gillespie A. Speaking up to prevent harm: a systematic review of the safety voice literature. Saf Sci. 2019;117:375–387. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker S, Turner N. Safety voice among young workers facing dangerous work: a policy-capturing approach. Saf Sci. 2014;62:530–537. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner N, Tucker S, Kelloway EK. Prevalence and demographic differences in microaccidents and safety behaviors among young workers in Canada. J Saf Res. 2015;53:39–43. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engemann KN, Scott CW. Voice in safety-oriented organizations: examining the intersection of hierarchical and mindful social contexts. Hum Resour Manage Rev. 2020;30(1):100650. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathisen GE, Tjora T, Bergh LIV. Speaking up about safety concerns in high-risk industries: correlates of safety voice in the offshore oil rig sector. Saf Sci. 2022;145:105487. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner N, Tucker S, Deng C. Revisiting vulnerability: comparing young and adult workers’ safety voice intentions under different supervisory conditions. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;135:105372. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X, Chan AHS. Demographic influences on safety consciousness and safety citizenship behavior of construction workers. Saf Sci. 2020;129:104835. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker S, Chmiel N, Turner N, et al. Perceived organizational support for safety and employee safety voice: the mediating role of coworker support for safety. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13(4):319–330. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.13.4.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conchie SM, Taylor PJ, Donald IJ. Promoting safety voice with safety-specific transformational leadership: the mediating role of two dimensions of trust. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17(1):105–115. doi:10.1037/a0025101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curcuruto M, Strauss K, Axtell C, et al. Voicing for safety in the workplace: a proactive goal-regulation perspective. Saf Sci. 2020;131:104902. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzoli A, Curcuruto M. Safety leadership and safety voices: exploring the mediation role of proactive motivations. J Risk Res. 2021;24(11):1368–1387. doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1863846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silla I, Gracia FJ, Peiró JM. Upward voice: participative decision making, trust in leadership and safety climate matter. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3672. doi:10.3390/su12093672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noort MC, Reader TW, Gillespie A. Safety voice and safety listening during aviation accidents: cockpit voice recordings reveal that speaking-up to power is not enough. Saf Sci. 2021;139:105260. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhao S, Li R, et al. The relationship between organizational identification and internal whistle-blowing: the joint moderating effects of perceived ethical climate and proactive personality. Rev Manag Sci. 2018;12(1):113–134. doi:10.1007/s11846-016-0214-z
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel HE. Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Ding X, Li Q, Zhang H, et al. Linking transformational leadership and work outcomes in temporary organizations: a social identity approach. Int J Proj Manag. 2017;35(4):543–556. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14(1):20–39. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee ES, Park TY, Koo B. Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2015;141(5):1049–1080. doi:10.1037/bul0000012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamper CL, Masterson SS. Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(8):875–894. doi:10.1002/job.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modig N. A continuum of organizations formed to carry out projects: temporary and stationary organization forms. Int J Proj Manag. 2007;25(8):807–814. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Johns G. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad Manage Rev. 2006;31(2):386–408. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.20208687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X, Chan AHS, Lui LKH, et al. Effects of individual and organizational factors on safety consciousness and safety citizenship behavior of construction workers: a comparative study between Hong Kong and mainland China. Safety Sci. 2021;135:105116. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EW. Employee voice behavior: integration and directions for future research. Acad Manag Ann. 2011;5(1):373–412. doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.574506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG, editors. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall; 1986. p. 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Harrison SH, Corley KG. Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. J Manage. 2008;34(3):325–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Thatcher SMB. Identification in organizations: the role of self-concept orientations and identification motives. Acad Manage Rev. 2010;35(4):516–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones C, Volpe EH. Organizational identification: extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. J Organ Behav. 2011;32(3):413–434. doi:10.1002/job.694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stets JE, Burke PJ. Identity theory and social identity theory. Soc Psychol Quart. 2000;63(3):224–237. doi:10.2307/2695870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker S, Burke PJ. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc Psychol Quart. 2000;63(4):284–297. doi:10.2307/2695840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ, White K M. A tale of two theories: a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Soc Psychol Quart. 1995;58(4):255–269. doi:10.2307/2787127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker S. Symbolic interactionism: a social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Raub SP. Perceived insider status and job design predict job attitudes and work performance of restaurant employees. J Hosp Tour Res. 2018;42(6):880–903. doi:10.1177/1096348016654974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui C, Lee C, Wang H. Organizational inducements and employee citizenship behavior: the mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of collectivism. Hum Resour Manage. 2015;54(3):439–456. doi:10.1002/hrm.21620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer RD, Dalal RS, José IJ, et al. Measuring job-related situational strength and assessing its interactive effects with personality on voluntary work behavior. J Manage. 2014;40(4):1010–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer RD, Dalal RS, Hermida R. A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. J Manage. 2010;36(1):121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D. Thirty years of safety climate research: reflections and future directions. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(5):1517–1522. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Dalal R S. Climate as situational strength: safety climate strength as a cross-level moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and safety behaviour. Eur J Work Organ Psy. 2016;25(1):120–132. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.987231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flatau-Harrison H, Griffin MA, Gagne M. Trickling down: the impact of leaders on individual role clarity through safety climate strength across time. Saf Sci. 2020;121:485–495. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO. Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Fu Y, Kang F. How to foster contractors’ cooperative behavior in the Chinese construction industry: direct and interaction effects of power and contract. Int J Proj Manag. 2018;36(7):940–953. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael F, Ashforth BE. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav. 1992;13(2):103–123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard H, Cooke T, Blismas N. Do perceptions of supervisors’ safety responses mediate the relationship between perceptions of the organizational safety climate and incident rates in the construction supply chain? J Constr Eng Manage. 2012;138(2):234–241. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhry RM, Fang D, Lingard H. Measuring safety climate of a construction company. J Constr Eng Manage. 2009;135(9):890–899. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, McCabe B, Hyatt D. Impact of individual resilience and safety climate on safety performance and psychological stress of construction workers: a case study of the Ontario construction industry. J Saf Res. 2017;61:167–176. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D. A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(4):587–596. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RP, Lingard H, Nevin S. Development and validation of a multilevel safety climate measurement tool in the construction industry. Constr Manage Econ. 2015;33(10):818–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard H, Cooke T, Blismas N. Coworkers’ response to occupational health and safety: an overlooked dimension of group-level safety climate in the construction industry? Eng Constr Archit Manage. 2011;18(2):159–175. doi:10.1108/09699981111111139
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson HA, Simmering MJ, Sturman MC. A tale of three perspectives: examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organ Res Methods. 2009;12(4):762–800. doi:10.1177/1094428109332834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Rev. ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Xu N, Jiang H, et al. Psychological driving mechanism of safety citizenship behaviors of construction workers: application of the theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. J Constr Eng Manage. 2020;146(4):04020027. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain GA, Bukhari S, Hameed I, et al. Am I treated better than my co-worker? A moderated mediation analysis of psychological contract fulfillment, organizational identification, and voice. Pers Rev. 2018;47(5):1133–1151. doi:10.1108/PR-04-2016-0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers N, Jetten J. The many ways to be marginal in a group. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013;17(1):3–21. doi:10.1177/1088868312453086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam LW, Chuang A, Wong CS, et al. A typology of three-way interaction models: applications and suggestions for Asian management research. Asia Pac J Manage. 2019;36(1):1–16. doi:10.1007/s10490-018-9577-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy LA, Huang Y, Lee J, et al. The moderating effect of long-haul truck drivers’ occupational tenure on the relationship between safety climate and driving safety behavior. Saf Sci. 2019;120:283–289. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia N, Xie Q, Hu X, et al. A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: a moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor’s and coworkers’ safety climate. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;134:105350. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Mei Q, Liu S, et al. Demographic differences in safety proactivity behaviors and safety management in Chinese small-scale enterprises. Saf Sci. 2019;120:179–184. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar