An integrative fuzzy Delphi decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) study on the risk perception-influencing factors

References

• Shakerian M, Jahangiri M, Alimohammadlou M, et al. Individual cognitive factors affecting unsafe acts among Iranian industrial workers: an integrative meta-synthesis interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Saf Sci. 2019;120:89–98. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahed A, Nikoomaram H, Ghaffari F. Analysis of the causes affecting the occurrence of occupational accidents in fly-in/fly-out workers of a gas pipe line dispatching project [research]. J Health Saf Work. 2020;10(3):212–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Alizadeh SS, Nojomi S, Rasoulzadeh Y, et al. A comprehensive review of studies of occupational accidents since the beginning of 1380 to the end of 1393 in Iran: a systematic review [review article]. Iran Occu Health J. 2017;14(1):93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Khoshakhlagh A, Halvani G, Dehghani A, et al. The survey of occupational accidents in Yazd gas agency (2013) [research]. J Inflamm Dis. 2016;20(4):67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Winge S, Albrechtsen E, Mostue BA. Causal factors and connections in construction accidents. Saf Sci. 2019;112:130–141. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhry RM. Behavior-based safety on construction sites: a case study. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;70:14–23. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaube S, Lermer E, Fischer P. The concept of risk perception in health-related behavior theory and behavior change. Perceived Saf. 2019: 101–118. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11456-5_7
   Google Scholar
• Namian M, Albert A, Feng J. Effect of distraction on hazard recognition and safety risk perception. J Constr Eng Manag. 2018;144(4):04018008. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man SS, Chan AHS, Alabdulkarim S. Quantification of risk perception: development and validation of the construction worker risk perception (CoWoRP) scale. J Saf Res. 2019;71:25–39. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledesma RD, Tosi JD, Díaz-Lázaro CM, et al. Predicting road safety behavior with implicit attitudes and the theory of planned behavior. J Saf Res. 2018;66:187–194. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin RJ, Toland MD, Okun AH, et al. Using a modified theory of planned behavior to examine adolescents’ workplace safety and health knowledge, perceptions, and behavioral intention: a structural equation modeling approach. J Youth Adolesc. 2018;47(8):1595–1610. doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0847-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man SS, Alabdulkarim S, Chan AHS, et al. The acceptance of personal protective equipment among Hong Kong construction workers: an integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior with risk perception and safety climate. J Saf Res. 2021;79:329–340. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2021.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaday S, Li KW, Man SS, et al. Risky scenario identification in a risk perception scale for construction workers in Thailand. J Saf Res. 2021;78:105–114. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2021.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man SS, Chan AHS, Alabdulkarim S, et al. The effect of personal and organizational factors on the risk-taking behavior of Hong Kong construction workers. Saf Sci. 2021;136:105155. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oah S, Na R, Moon K. The influence of safety climate, safety leadership, workload, and accident experiences on risk perception: a study of Korean manufacturing workers. Saf Health Work. 2018;9(4):427–433. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2018.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboagye AK, Dai B, Bakpa EK. Influence of risk perception on task and contextual performance: a case of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in nurses. Eval Health Prof. 2022;45(2):126–136.: 0163278720975071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia N, Xie Q, Hu X, et al. A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: a moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor’s and coworkers’ safety climate. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;134:105350. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Mearns K, Matthiesen SB, et al. Using the job demands–resources model to investigate risk perception, safety climate and job satisfaction in safety critical organizations. Scand J Psychol. 2011;52(5):465–475. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00885.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M. A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2018;24(7):1723–1760. doi:10.1080/10807039.2018.1424531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltanzadeh A, Sadeghi Yarandi M, Mirzaei Aliabadi M, et al. Modeling cause-and-effect relationships among predictive variables of human error based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2022: 23:3, 259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdinia M, Yarandi MS, Jafarinia E, et al. Development of a new technique for safety risk assessment in construction projects based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst. 2021;7(3):04021037. doi:10.1061/AJRUA6.0001157
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadfam I, Aliabadi MM, Soltanian AR, et al. Investigating interactions among vital variables affecting situation awareness based on fuzzy DEMATEL method. Int J Ind Ergon. 2019;74:102842. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameyaw EE, Hu Y, Shan M, et al. Application of Delphi method in construction engineering and management research: a quantitative perspective. J Civ Eng. 2016;22(8):991–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapari R, Ismail H, Ismail R, et al. Application of fuzzy Delphi in the selection of COPD risk factors among steel industry workers. Tanaffos. 2017;16(1):46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cafiso S, Di Graziano A, Pappalardo G. Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety. Saf Sci. 2013;57:254–263. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Huang W, Zhang Y. Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Saf Sci. 2011;49(2):243–252. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2010.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Shao C, Ma S, et al. Constructing road safety performance indicators using fuzzy Delphi method and grey Delphi method. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(3):1509–1514. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray TJ, Pipino LL, Van Gigch JP. A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi. Hum Syst Manag. 1985;5(1):76–80. doi:10.3233/HSM-1985-5111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu T, Yang T. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the selection of advertising media. J Manag Syst. 2000;7(1):19–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bavafa A, Mahdiyar A, Marsono AK. Identifying and assessing the critical factors for effective implementation of safety programs in construction projects. Saf Sci. 2018;106:47–56. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdiyar A, Tabatabaee S, Abdullah A, et al. Identifying and assessing the critical criteria affecting decision-making for green roof type selection. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;39:772–783. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang P-L, Hsu C-W, Chang P-C. Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies. Int J Hydrog. 2011;36(21):14172–14179. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Fam IM, Khoshnoud M, et al. Design and implementation of a fuzzy expert system for performance assessment of an integrated health, safety, environment (HSE) and ergonomics system: the case of a gas refinery. Inf Sci. 2008;178(22):4280–4300. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltanzadeh A, Sadeghi Yarandi M, Mirzaei Aliabadi M, et al. Modeling cause-and-effect relationships among predictive variables of human error based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2022;23(3):259–276. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2021.1938281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo Y-F, Chen P-C. Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using fuzzy Delphi method. Expert Syst Appl. 2008;35(4):1930–1939. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibi A, Jahantigh FF, Sarafrazi A. Fuzzy Delphi technique for forecasting and screening items. Asian J Res Bus Eco Manag. 2015;5(2):130–143. doi:10.5958/2249-7307.2015.00036.5
   Google Scholar
• Shieh J-I, Wu H-H, Huang K-K. A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowl Based Syst. 2010;23(3):277–282. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2010.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Hu Y, Zhang X, et al. An evidential DEMATEL method to identify critical success factors in emergency management. Appl Soft Comput. 2014;22:504–510. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz E, Celik E. A fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate critical operational hazards during gas freeing process in crude oil tankers. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2015;38:243–253. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdinia M, Mohammadfam I, Soltanzadeh A, et al. A fuzzy-BN DEMATEL model for predicting safety behavior. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021;29 (just-accepted):1–8. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.2015741
   Google Scholar
• Wu W-W, Lee Y-T. Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst Appl. 2007;32(2):499–507. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfahani AN, Sarand VF, Arian A. Explain the impact of organizational factors affecting food safety performance using fuzzy DEMATEL. Int J Manag Sci. 2015;5(7):531–543.
   Google Scholar
• Chaswa EN, Kosamu IBM, Kumwenda S, et al. Risk perception and its influencing factors among construction workers in Malawi. Safety. 2020;6(2):33. doi:10.3390/safety6020033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Fiestas M, Rodríguez-Garzón I, Delgado-Padial A. Firefighter perception of risk: a multinational analysis. Saf Sci. 2020;123:104545. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazayeri E. Hazard recognition and risk perception among union electricians. University of Kentucky; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pandit B, Albert A, Patil Y, et al. Impact of safety climate on hazard recognition and safety risk perception. Saf Sci. 2019;113:44–53. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyhri A, Backer-Grøndahl A. Personality and risk perception in transport. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;49:470–475. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashmiri D, Taherpour F, Namian M, etal. Construction Research Congress. March 8–10 Tempe, Arizona 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez del Puerto C, Clevenger CM, Boremann K, et al. Exploratory study to identify perceptions of safety and risk among residential Latino construction workers as distinct from commercial and heavy civil construction workers. J Constr Eng Manag. 2014;140(2):04013048. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000794,04013048.
   Google Scholar
• Portell M, Gil RM, Losilla JM, et al. Characterizing occupational risk perception: the case of biological, ergonomic and organizational hazards in Spanish healthcare workers. Span J Psychol. 2014;17, E51. doi:10.1017/sjp.2014.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar