Risk-based inspection applied to two-post above-ground automotive lifts

References

• American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and Automotive Lift Institute (ALI). Standard for automotive lifts – safety requirements for operation, inspection and maintenance (ALOIM). Cortland (NY): ALI; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Burlet-Vienney D, Galy B, Cusson Bertrand K. Analysis of vehicle stability when using two-post above-ground automotive lifts: distribution of forces in arms. Saf Sci. 2020;134; doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (CNESST). Rapport d’enquête [Investigation report] [Internet]. Montréal (QC): CNESST [cited 2022 Sep 22]; 2015. (Report No. EN-004053). French. Available from: https://www.centredoc.cnesst.gouv.qc.ca/pdf/Enquete/ed004053.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (CNESST). Rapport d’enquête [Investigation report] [Internet]. Montréal (QC): CNESST; 2019 [cited 2022 Sep 22]. (Report No. EN-004218). French. Available from: https://www.centredoc.cnesst.gouv.qc.ca/pdf/Enquete/ed004218.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA 1926.1412 – inspections [Internet]. Washington (DC): US Department of Labor; 2010. Standard No. 1926.1412:2010 [cited 2022 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1412
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations (SOR/86-304, s. 4.5) [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Government of Canada; 2021 [cited 2022 Sep 22]. Available from: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/SOR-86-304.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gouvernement du Québec. Regulation respecting occupational health and safety (RLRQ, c. S-2.1, r. 13) [Internet]. Québec (QC): Gouvernement du Québec; 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.legisque-bec.gouv.qc.ca/en/document/cr/S-2.1,%20r.%2013
   Google Scholar
• Journal officiel de la République française. Code du travail (section 4: Vérifications des équipements de travail. Article R4323-23 : vérifications périodiques) [Labor code (section 4: work equipment inspections. Article R4323-23: periodic inspections] [Internet]. Paris (France): Secrétariat général du gouvernement; 2008. French [cited 2022 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000018531479
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Standard Association (CSA). Overhead cranes, gantry cranes, monorails, hoists, and jib cranes. Mississauga (ON): CSA; 2016. Standard No. CSA B167:2016.
   Google Scholar
• CCOHS: effective workplace inspections [Internet]. Hamilton (ON): Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety; c1997–2022 [cited 2022 Aug 9]. Available from: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/effectiv.html
   Google Scholar
• Megaw ED. Factors affecting visual inspection accuracy. Appl Ergon. 1979;10(1):27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association française de normalisation (AFNOR). Élévateurs de véhicules [Automotive lifts]. Paris: AFNOR; 2011. Standard No. NF EN 1493:2011. French.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution (BSI). Vehicle lifts. London: BSI; 2010. Standard No. BS EN 1493:2010.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution (BSI). Vehicle lifts – installation, maintenance, thorough examination and safe use – code of practice. London: BSI; 2014. Standard No. BS 7980:2013+A1:2014.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand (Standards AS/NZ). Cranes – safe use. Part 9: vehicle hoists. Homebush (NSW): Standards Australia; 1996. Standard No. AS/NZS 2550.9:1996.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia, Standards New Zealand (Standards AS/NZ). Cranes (including hoists and winches) Part 9: vehicle hoists. Homebush (NSW): Standards Australia; 1996. Standard No. AS/NZS 1418.9: 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett RL, Glauber JB. Automotive lifts – unrestrained v. restrained swing arms. Safety Brief. 2009;29(2):373–387.
   Google Scholar
• Woody P, McDonald A. Assessment of the arm locking systems of two-post vehicle lifts. Buxton: Health and Safety Laboratory; 2015. (Report no. RR1030).
   Google Scholar
• Auto Prévention. Fiche d’entretien préventif – Pont élévateur hors terre à deux colonnes [Technical sheet – preventive maintenance of two-post above-ground automotive lift]. Brossard (QC): Auto Prévention; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• School District 27 Cariboo-Chilcotin. Monthly auto lift inspection. Williams Lake (BC): School District 27 Cariboo-Chilcotin; 2019 [cited 2022 Sep 22]. Available from: https://sd27storage.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/medialib/2019-10-30-autoliftcheck.48e9951049.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rotary. Operation & maintenance manual. SPOA10NB, SPOA10, SPO10, SPOA7, SPOA9, SPO9 (OM20143). Madison (IN): Rotary; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Whip Industries. Maintenance requires. Fort Worth (TX): Whip Industries; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Safety of machinery – general principles for design – risk assessment and risk reduction. Geneva: ISO; 2010. Standard No. ISO 12100:2010.
   Google Scholar
• Burlet-Vienney D, Galy B, Cusson Bertrand K, et al. Analysis of vehicle stability when using two-post above-ground automotive lifts: support pad slippage. Safety. 2022;8(3):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety8030058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake RE. Case studies. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 1994. p. 236–247
   Google Scholar
• Globe. Installation and service. Model AFO-7A & EH above-floor asymetrical lift and model AFO-7 & EH above-floor standard lift. Model AFO-9A & EH above-floor asymetrical lift and Model AFO-9 & EH above-floor standard lift. Dallas (TX): Dresser Industries; n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Girolift. Rapport d’inspection de sécurité [Safety inspection report]. Saint-Jacques (QC): Canada Hydraulic Equipment; n.d. French.
   Google Scholar
• ISN Canada. Rapport d’inspection visuelle de ponts [Visual inspection report of lifts]. Boucherville (QC): ISN Canada; n.d. French.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and Automotive Lift Institute (ALI). Standard for automotive lifts – safety requirements for operation, inspection and maintenance (ALOIM). Cortland (NY): ALI; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R.G.D. Lifts Rapport d’inspection de pont élévateur [Lift inspection report]. Saint-Hubert (QC): R.G.D. Lifts; n.d. French.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa T. Periodic inspection policy with preventive maintenance. Nav Res Logist Q. 1984;31:33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei E. A new model for the optimization of periodic inspection intervals with failure interaction: a case study for a turbine rotor. Case Stud Eng Fail Anal. 2017;9:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2015.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Blokdyk G. Risk-based inspection. The ultimate step-by-step guide. Scotts Valley (CA): CreateSpace; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Selvik JT, Scarf P, Aven T. An extended methodology for risk based inspection planning. Reliab: Theory Appl. 2011;2:115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Chang MK, Chang RR, Shu CM, et al. Application of risk based inspection in refinery and processing piping. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2005;18(4–6):397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamad H, Yong B, Liaqat A. A risk-based inspection planning methodology for integrity management of subsea oil and gas pipelines. Ships Offshore Struct. 2021;16(7):687–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1747751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan FI, Sadiq R, Haddara MM. Risk-based inspection and maintenance (RBIM): multi-attribute decision-making with aggregative risk analysis. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2004;82(6):398–411. https://doi.org/10.1205/psep.82.6.398.53209
   Google Scholar
• Singh M, Pokhrel M. A Fuzzy logic-possibilistic methodology for risk-based inspection (RBI) planning of oil and gas piping subjected to microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC). Int J Press Vessel Pip. 2018;159:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Z, Li J, Wu Z, et al. An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection. Safety Sci. 2011;49(6):852–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuai J, Han K, Xu X. Risk-based inspection for large-scale crude oil tanks. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2012;25(1):166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed M, Tran DQ. Risk-based inspection model for hot mix asphalt pavement construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 2021;147(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque J, Straub D. Risk-based optimal inspection strategies for structural systems using dynamic Bayesian networks. Struct Saf. 2019;76:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park ST, Yang BS. An implementation of risk-based inspection for elevator maintenance. J Mech Sci Technol. 2011;24(12):2367–2376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-010-1004-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary W. Risk based inspection: a case study evaluation of offshore process plant. Sheffield: Health and Safety Laboratory; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rachman A, Chandima Ratnayake RM. Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2019;185:518–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber MH. Risk based inspection – the framework. Struct Eng Int. 2002;12(3):186–194. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686602777965388
   Google Scholar
• Association française de normalisation (AFNOR). Application de la statistique – Introduction à la fiabilité [Application of statistics – introduction to reliability]. Paris: AFNOR; 1984. Standard No. NF X06-501:1984. French.
   Google Scholar