The effect of empowering leadership on miners’ unsafe behavior: a cross-level chain mediation model

References

• Yang L, Wang X, Zhu JQ, et al. Influencing factors, formation mechanism, and pre-control methods of coal miners’ unsafe behavior: a systematic literature review. Front Public Health. 2022;10. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.792015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, Cao Q, Xie C, et al. Analysis of intervention strategies for coal miners’ unsafe behaviors based on analytic network process and system dynamics. Saf Sci. 2019;118:145–157. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian GX, Zhang Z. Linking empowering leadership to employee innovation: the mediating role of work engagement. Soc Behav Personal. 2020;48(10):1–8. doi:10.2224/sbp.9320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SH, Pater IED, Yi M, et al. Empowering leadership: employee-related antecedents and consequences. Asia Paci J Manag. 2020;20:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Li YP. Can relationship pattern within the team influence employee silence behavior: an explanation framework based on the societal recognition theory. J Eng Manag. 2017;31(4):34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Li HX, Di HX, Tian SC, et al. The research on the impact of management level’s charismatic leadership style on miners’ unsafe behavior. Open Bio Eng J. 2015;9:244–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schunk HD, DiBenedetto MK. Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2020;60. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutroubas V, Galanakis M. Bandura’s social learning theory and its importance in the organizational psychology context. Psychol Res. 2022;12(6):315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Yan J. The mechanism of how trust climate impacts on individual performance. Acta Psychol Sinica. 2007;39(6):1111–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Chen GQ, Chen ZD. Impact mechanism of leader empowering behavior on individual learning capability. Sci Res Manag. 2017;38(3):114–127.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SE, Dahinten VS. Psychological safety as a mediator of the relationship between inclusive leadership and nurse voice behaviors and error reporting. J Nurs Schol. 2021;53(6):737–745. doi:10.1111/jnu.12689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmet P, Doğru OC, Gülgün M. Role of supervisor behavioral integrity for safety in the relationship between top-management safety climate, safety motivation, and safety performance. Saf Health Work. 2022;13(2):192–200. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2022.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandra L, France SH, Patrice D. Fostering mental health at work: the butterfly effect of management behaviors. Int J Human Res Manag. 2022;33(13):2744–2766. doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1886151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwesi AT, Justice M. The impact of safety climate on safety related driving behaviors. Traff Psychol Behav. 2016;40(4):48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chen HZ, Liu SX, Mei Q. Meta-analysis on impact of safety leadership on employees’ safety behavior. China Saf Sci J. 2020;30(5):7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lee YH, Lu TE, Yang CC, et al. A multilevel approach on empowering leadership and safety behavior in the medical industry: the mediating effects of knowledge sharing and safety climate. Saf Sci. 2019;117:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Lv YW. Influence of sensitive leadership on unsafe behavior of miners with different educational levels. Saf Coal Mines. 2020;51(1):243–246.
   Google Scholar
• Ye XF, Li XC, Wang ZN. Influence of safety climate on safety behavior: a moderated mediation model. Sci Deci Mak. 2014: 18–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bergheim K, Eid J, Hystad SW, et al. The role of psychological capital in perception of safety climate among air traffic controllers. J Leader Organ. 2013;20(2):232–241. doi:10.1177/1548051813475483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X. On the relation between the psychological empowerment and the violation behaviors of the airport security staff members. J Saf Environ. 2017;17(1):2263–2267.
   Google Scholar
• Ye XF, Ren S, Li XC, et al. The mediating role of psychological capital between perceived management commitment and safety behavior. J Saf Res. 2019;72(C):29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ma YQ, Xi M, Xu Q, et al. How does abusive supervision affect subordinate’s counterproductive work behavior? A perspective of social cognitive theory. Chinese J Manag. 2017;14(8):1153–1161.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce CL, Sims JR, Henry P. Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: an examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dyna Theory Res Pract. 2002;6(2):172–197. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahearne M, Mathieu J, Rapp A. To empower or not to empower your sales force? an empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(5):945–955. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Bartol KM, Locke EA. Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Acad Manag J. 2006;49(6):1239–1251. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bartol KM. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad Manag J. 2010;53(1):107–128. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu ZQ, Wang HQ. Identify unsafe behavior proneness coal miner: a fuzzy analogy preferred ratio method. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tian SC, Liu F, Yang L, et al. Study on miners’ unsafe behaviors based on theory of planned behavior. Mining Saf Environ Prot. 2014;41(4):109–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manag J. 1990;33(4):692–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling B, Duan JY, Zhu YL. Psychological safety in workplace: conceptualization, antecedents and consequences. Adv Psychol Sci. 2010;18(10):1580–1589.
   Google Scholar
• He YM, Wang Y, Payne SC. How is safety climate formed? A meta-analysis of the antecedents of safety climate. Organ Psychol Rev. 2019;9(2–3):124–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke S, Ward K. The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees’ safety participation. Risk Anal. 2006;26(5):1175–1185. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00824.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang GY, Chen Y, Knippenberg D, et al. Antecedents and consequences of empowering leadership: leader power distance, leader perception of team capability, and team innovation. J Organ Behav. 2020;41(6):551–556. doi:10.1002/job.2449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi N, Bharadwaja M. Empowering leadership and psychological health: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Emp Resp Rights J. 2020;32(3):97–121. doi:10.1007/s10672-020-09349-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaja M, Tripathi N. Linking empowering leadership and job attitudes: the role of psychological empowerment. J Asia Busi Stud. 2020;15(1):110–127. doi:10.1108/JABS-03-2020-0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed EM. The mechanism underlying the relationship between empowering leadership and work passion. Hum Sys Manag. 2022;41(1):59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luciano MM, Mathieu JE, Ruddy TM. Leading multiple teams: average and relative external leadership influences on team empowerment and effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 2014;99(2):322–331. doi:10.1037/a0035025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang CF, Chen JA. How empowering leadership and a cooperative climate influence employees’ voice behavior and knowledge sharing in the hotel industry. J Qual Assur Hospt Tour. 2020;22(4):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khahan NN, Apiwat A. Effect of employees’ work engagement and knowledge sharing as mediators of empowering leadership and innovative work behaviour. Indus Commer Train. 2021;53(4):313–330. doi:10.1108/ICT-08-2020-0100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widianto S. Empowering leadership to performance excellence: the role of knowledge sharing and self-efficacy. Int J Busi Excell. 2021;23(3):297–311. doi:10.1504/IJBEX.2021.113701
   Google Scholar
• Zhang YX, Li JZ, Feng GR, et al. Research on relationship between miners’ perceived organizational support and unsafe behavior based on SEM. Saf Coal Mines. 2017;48(8):238–241.
   Google Scholar
• Gracia FJ, Tomás I, Martínez-Córcoles M, et al. Empowering leadership, mindful organizing and safety performance in a nuclear power plant: a multilevel structural equation model. Saf Sci. 2020;123(C). doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104542
   Google Scholar
• Muchiri MK, McMurray AJ, Nkhoma M, et al. How transformational and empowering leader behaviors enhance workplace safety: a review and research agenda. J Dev Areas. 2019;53(1):257–265. doi:10.1353/jda.2019.0015
   Google Scholar
• Yang G, Zhou Y. The influence of self-sacrificial leadership on employees’ taking charge behavior: the roles of psychological safety and perceived organizational goal clarity. Hum Res Dev China. 2017;17(6):2263–2267.
   Google Scholar
• Ngatimun. Psychological safety: as a mediator between inclusive leadership and innovative working behavior. J Criti Rev. 2020;7(6):1055–1060.
   Google Scholar
• Heyns MM, McCallaghan S, Senne OW. Supervisor support and work engagement: the mediating role of psychological safety in a post-restructuring business organisation. J Psychol Africa. 2021;31(2):140–144. doi:10.1080/14330237.2021.1903180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak WJ, Jackson CL. Relationship building in empowering leadership processes: a test of mediation and moderation. J Manag Organ. 2015;21(4):369–387. doi:10.1017/jmo.2015.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Yu JL, Huang Y. How does feeling trusted from supervisors promote employees’ voice behavior: the role of psychological safety, self-efficacy and power distance. Hum Res Dev China. 2018;35(12):18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Yin JL, Ma ZZ, Yu HY, et al. Transformational leadership and employee knowledge sharing: explore the mediating roles of psychological safety and team efficacy. J Knowle Manag. 2020;24(2):150–171. doi:10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu PQ, Liu B, Li J. Effect of empowering leadership on willingness to knowledge sharing of knowledge employees: based on perspective of social information processing. Technol Eco. 2018;37(7):81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ni GD, Zhu YY, Zhang ZY, et al. Influencing mechanism of job satisfaction on safety behavior of new generation of construction workers based on chinese context: the mediating roles of work engagement and safety knowledge sharing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22). doi:10.3390/ijerph17228361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi XY, Wen Y. Research on the relationship between psychological safety and individual job burnout. SHS Web Confer. 2021;96. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20219602004
   Google Scholar
• Liu KB, Ge YQ. How psychological safety influences employee creativity in China: work engagement as a mediator. Soc Behav Personal Int J. 2020;48(8):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Lu MY, Wang M, et al. Influencing factors analysis of underground coal mine team safety atmosphere based on ISM. Saf Coal Mines. 2017;48(5):224–227.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Tenne-Gazit O. Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: a social network analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93:744–757. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke S. Safety leadership: a meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviors. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2013;86:22–49. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmeister K, Gibbons AM, Johnson SK, et al. The differential effects of transformational leadership facets on employee safety. Saf Sci. 2014;62:68–78. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsva M, Condrey SE. Motivating personnel at russian nuclear power plants: a case-study of motivation theory application. Public Person Manag. 2005;34:343–356. doi:10.1177/009102600503400406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flin R, Yule S. Leadership for safety: industrial experience. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(2):45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard H, Zhang RP, Oswald D. Effect of leadership and communication practices on the safety climate and behaviour of construction workgroups. Engin Constr Archi Manag. 2019;26(6):886–906. doi:10.1108/ECAM-01-2018-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo TY. Safety climate: current status of the research and future prospects. J Saf Sci Resil. 2020;1:106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Xi YT, Liu RH, Zhang QX, et al. Impact of safety climate on safety behavior of maritime pilots: mediation of safety consciousness. China Saf. Sci J. 2020;30(9):15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Shi GL, Tan HS, Li HX, et al. Influences of cognitive structure variables on miners’ unsafe behavior intentions. Advan Civil Engine. 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye XF, Li XC, Wang ZN. Safety climate and safety behavior – the mediating role of psychological capital. Soft Sci. 2014;28(1):86–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wang JK, Wang XH, et al. Exploring the impacts of factors contributing to unsafe behavior of coal miners. Saf Sci. 2019;115:339–348. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalteh HO, Mortazavi SB, Mohammadi E, et al. The relationship between safety culture and safety climate and safety performance: a systematic review. Int J Occup Saf Ergo. 2018;27(1):1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You MJ, Li S, Li DW, et al. Study on the influencing factors of miners’ unsafe behavior propagation. Front Psychol. 2019;10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian XH, Sun YY, Zuo ZH, et al. Transactional leadership and employee safety behavior: impact of safety climate and psychological empowerment. Soc Behav Personal. 2019;47(6):1–9. doi:10.2224/sbp.7295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang LG, Wu C, Wang B. Research on fundamental problems about psychological safety of enterprise employees. J Saf Sci Technol. 2019;15(7):20–25.
   Google Scholar
• He CQ, Mccabe B, Jia GS. Effect of leader–member exchange on construction worker safety behavior: safety climate and psychological capital as the mediators. Saf Sci. 2021;142(10).
   Google Scholar
• Guchait P, Abbott JL, Lee KJ, et al. The Influence of perceived forgiveness climate on service recovery performance: the mediating effect of psychological safety and organizational fairness. J Hospt Tour Manag. 2019;40(6):94–102. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Potipiroon W, Wongpreedee A. Ethical climate and whistleblowing intentions: testing the mediating roles of public service motivation and psychological safety among local government employees. Public Person Manag. 2020;50(3):327–355. doi:10.1177/0091026020944547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo SQ, Jiang G. Management survey research methodology. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Zhen Y. Study on strategies and psychoanalysis of coal miner’s unsafe behaviors [master’s thesis]. Tangshan: North China University of Science and Technology; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G. Rwg: an assessment of within-group inter-rater agreement. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(2):306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese PD. Group size, ICC values, and group–level correlations: A simulation. Organiz Res Meth. 1998;1(4):355–373.
   Google Scholar
• Finch WH, Bolin JE. Multilevel modeling using Mplus. 1st ed. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang ZA. A general multilevel sem framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Meth. 2010;15(3):209–233. doi:10.1037/a0020141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Selig JP. Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Commu Meth Measu. 2012;6:77–98. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679848
   Google Scholar
• Shehawy YM. Current workplace issues and behaviours in tourism and hospitality: moderating role of empowering leadership. Current Issues Tour. 2022;25(10):1627–1648. doi:10.1080/13683500.2021.1928612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Pinto J. Dynamic linkages of empowering and transformational leadership with knowledge sharing in project teams. Knowl Manag Res Prac. 2022;20(4):571–579. doi:10.1080/14778238.2022.2067492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma YO, Liu XG. Influence of managerial prosocial violations on miners’ unsafe behavior. Coal Technol. 2021;40(5):209–212.
   Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS. Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manage. 2005;31(6):874–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helland E, Christensen M, Innstrand ST. The relationship between empowering leadership, work characteristics, and work engagement among academics: a SEM mediation analysis. Scand J Work Organ Psychol. 2020;5(1):1–13. doi:10.16993/sjwop.84
   Google Scholar
• Nuzul AA, Witjaksono AD, Kistyanto A. Empowering leadership and employee creativity: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. SEI J Manag. 2020;3(6):14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gao A, Jiang J. Perceived empowering leadership, harmonious passion, and employee voice: the moderating role of job autonomy. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1484. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed B, Naqvi S, Khan A, et al. Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: the role of psychological safety. J Manag Organ. 2017;25(1):117–136. doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maximo N, Stande MW, Coxen L. Authentic leadership and work engagement: the indirect effects of psychological safety and trust in supervisors. SA J Ind Psychol. 2019;45(1):e1–e11.
   Google Scholar
• Gao WM, Cao QR, Xu ZQ. The impact of ethical leadership on employee safe performance: the cross-level mediating effect of safety climate and psychological capital. Manag Rev. 2017;29(11):116–128.
   Google Scholar