Effects of safety leadership and safety management practices on safety participation through a casual-chain mediators approach in the Chinese construction industry

References

• Business Wire. Construction in China – key trends and opportunities to 2023; 2019. Dublin: Research and Markets.
   Google Scholar
• COSHA. Statistics on occupational safety accidents in the construction industry, China [Internet]; [cited 2020 Aug 23]. Chinese. Available from: http://www.cosha.org.cn
   Google Scholar
• China Labour Bulletin. China’s most dangerous industry is getting more dangerous [Internet]; [cited 2021 Jun 7]. Available from: https://clb.org.hk/content/china’s-most-dangerous-industry-getting-more-dangerous
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Jin R, Wood H, et al. Investigation of demographic factors in construction employees’ safety perceptions. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2019;23(7):2815–2828. doi:10.1007/s12205-019-2044-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A. Regional report: China’s construction industry. International Construction; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou X-H, Shen S-L, Xu Y-S, et al. Analysis of production safety in the construction industry of China in 2018. Sustainability. 2019;11(17):4537. doi:10.3390/su11174537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayram M. Factors affecting employee safety productivity: an empirical study in an OHSAS 18001-certified organization. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;28(1):1–14. doi:10.1080/10803548.2020.1739892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(3):347–358. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vinodkumar MN, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(6):2082–2093. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Ju C, Koh TY, et al. The impact of transformational leadership on safety climate and individual safety behavior on construction sites. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(1):1–17. doi:10.3390/ijerph14010045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Muñiz B, Montes-Peón JM, Vázquez-Ordás CJ. The role of safety leadership and working conditions in safety performance in process industries. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2017;50:403–415. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He C, Jia G, McCabe B, et al. Relationship between leader–member exchange and construction worker safety behavior: the mediating role of communication competence. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;27(2):371–383. doi:10.1080/10803548.2019.1579484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung CM, Zhang RP, Cui Q, et al. The antecedents of safety leadership: the job demands–resources model. Saf Sci. 2021;133:104979. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP. Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: the role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(2):286–296. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard H, Zhang RP, Oswald D. Effect of leadership and communication practices on the safety climate and behaviour of construction workgroups. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 2019;26(6):886–906. doi:10.1108/ECAM-01-2018-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H. The influence of safety-specific transformational leadership and high-quality relationships on mindful safety practices through safety climate: a study in Chinese petroleum industry. J Appl Secur Res. 2020;16(3):328–344. doi:10.1080/19361610.2020.1761744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H. The effects of safety-specific transformational leadership and active transactional leadership on mindful safety practice adoption in the Chinese petroleum industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022;28(3):1929–1936. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.1943203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curcuruto M, Griffin MA. Prosocial and proactive ‘safety citizenship behaviour’ (SCB): the mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership. Saf Sci. 2018;104:29–38. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl Ø, Olsen E. Safety compliance on offshore platforms: a multi-sample survey on the role of perceived leadership involvement and work climate. Saf Sci. 2013;54:17–26. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashour A, Hassan Z. The role of the work environment on the safety performance and safety management practices: its influence on the attitudes of nurses in the Jordanian hospitals. Am J Appl Sci. 2019;16(11):314–326. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2019.314.326
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam C, Mohd Shamsudin F, Mohd Zin M, et al. The influence of safety management practices on safety behavior: a study among manufacturing SMES in Malaysia. Int J Supply Chain Manag. 2016;5(4):148–160.
   Google Scholar
• Keffane S. Communication’s role in safety management and performance of the road safety practices. Jordan J Civ Eng. 2015;9(2):229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opoku A, Zhao S, Lok KL, et al. Promoting employee safety performance in the Chinese construction industry. In: Scott L, Neilson CJ, editors. ARCOM 2020 – Association of Researchers in Construction Management 36th Annual Conference 2020 – Proceedings. ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management; 2020 Sep 7-8. 2020. p. 285–294.
   Google Scholar
• Mearns K, Whitaker SM, Flin R. Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Saf Sci. 2003;41(8):641–680. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00011-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín LS, Lipscomb H, Cifuentes M, et al. Associations between safety climate and safety management practices in the construction industry. Am J Ind Med. 2017;60(6):557–568. doi:10.1002/ajim.22723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H, Mohamed Zainal SR. Facilitating mindful safety practices among first-line workers in the Chinese petroleum industry through safety management practices and safety motivation. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021;28(3):1–8. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.1902672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G. A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(4):616–628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newaz MT, Davis PR, Jefferies M, et al. Developing a safety climate factor model in construction research and practice. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 2018;25(6):738–757. doi:10.1108/ECAM-02-2017-0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zohar D, Robertson MM, et al. Development and validation of safety climate scales for lone workers using truck drivers as exemplar. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2013;17:5–19. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Mearns K, Matthiesen SB, et al. Using the job demands–resources model to investigate risk perception, safety climate and job satisfaction in safety critical organizations. Scand J Psychol. 2011;52(5):465–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TD. An assessment of safety climate, job satisfaction and turnover intention relationships using a national sample of workers from the USA. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24(1):27–34. doi:10.1080/10803548.2016.1268446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Muñiz B, Montes-Peón JM, Vázquez-Ordás CJ. Safety culture: analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. J Safety Res. 2007;38(6):627–641. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utami HN. Improving safety behavior in the workplace BT. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Business and Public Administration (AICoBPA 2019); 2020 Nov 17. Atlantis Press; 2020. p. 142–146. doi:10.2991/aebmr.k.201116.030
   Google Scholar
• McGonagle AK, Essenmacher L, Hamblin L, et al. Management commitment to safety, teamwork, and hospital worker injuries. J Hosp Adm. 2016;5(6):46–52. doi:10.5430/jha.v5n6p46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avram E, Ionescu D, Mincu CL. Perceived safety climate and organizational trust: the mediator role of job satisfaction. Procedia – Soc Behav Sci. 2015;187:679–684. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.126
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad J, Quoquab Habib F, Alias MA. Job satisfaction and organisational citizenship behaviour: an empirical study at higher learning institutions. Asian Acad Manag J. 2011;16(2):149–165.
   Google Scholar
• Ni G, Zhu Y, Zhang Z, et al. Influencing mechanism of job satisfaction on safety behavior of new generation of construction workers based on Chinese context: the mediating roles of work engagement and safety knowledge sharing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22):1–24. doi:10.3390/ijerph17228361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShields OW, Kara A, Kaynak E. Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: applying Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Int J Educ Manag. 2005;19(2):128–139. doi:10.1108/09513540510582426
   Google Scholar
• Ruthankoon R, Olu Ogunlana S. Testing Herzberg’s two-factor theory in the Thai construction industry. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 2003;10(5):333–341. doi:10.1108/09699980310502946
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu F. The formation of brand loyalty: a partial dual-factor explanation. J Int Consum Mark. 2017;29(4):239–249. doi:10.1080/08961530.2017.1303416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vredenburgh AG. Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? J Safety Res. 2002;33(2):259–276. doi:10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00016-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock N, Hadaya P. Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: the inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Inf Syst J. 2018;28(1):227–261. doi:10.1111/isj.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah J-H, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, et al. Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: on using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2018;30(11):3192–3210. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling NA. Effects of job satisfaction and conscientiousness on extra-role behaviors. J Bus Psychol. 2015;25(1):119–130. doi: 10.1007/s10869-009-9134-0
   Google Scholar
• Dunn AM, Heggestad ED, Shanock LR, et al. Intra-individual response variability as an indicator of insufficient effort responding: comparison to other indicators and relationships with individual differences. J Bus Psychol. 2018;33(1):105–121. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9479-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehseen S, Ramayah T, Sajilan S. Testing and controlling for common method variance: a review of available methods. J Manag Sci. 2017;4(2):142–168. doi:10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. 2019;31(1):2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon AH, Rahman IA. SEM-PLS analysis of inhibiting factors of cost performance for large construction projects in Malaysia: perspective of clients and consultants. Sci World J. 2014;2014:165158. doi:10.1155/2014/165158
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad: Mark Sci. 2015;43(1):115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock N, Lynn G. Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2012;13(7):546–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, et al. Partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev. 2014;26(2):106–121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon MA, Cheah JH, Ramayah T, et al. Mediation analysis issues and recommendations. J Appl Struct Equ Model. 2018;2 (1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Wu T-C, Chang S-H, Shu C-M, et al. Safety leadership and safety performance in petrochemical industries: the mediating role of safety climate. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2011;24(6):716–721. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJoy DM, Schaffer BS, Wilson MG, et al. Creating safer workplaces: assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. J Safety Res. 2004;35(1):81–90. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcury TA, Mills T, Marín AJ, et al. Work safety climate and safety practices among immigrant Latino residential construction workers. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(8):736–745. doi:10.1002/ajim.22058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar