Investigating the relationship between eye movements and the situation awareness of forklift operators for accident prevention

References

• Marsh SM, Fosbroke DE. Trends of occupational fatalities involving machines, United States, 1992–2010. Am J Ind Med. 2015;58(11):1160–1173. doi:10.1002/ajim.22532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saric S, Bab-Hadiashar A, Hoseinnezhad R, et al. Analysis of forklift accident trends within Victorian industry (Australia). Saf Sci. 2013;60:176–184. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarupuri B, Lee GA, Billinghurst M. An Augmented Reality Guide for Assisting Forklift Operation. In: Veas E, Langlotz T, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 2016 International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct); 2016 Sep 19–23; Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. New York: IEEE Computer Society. 2016. p. 59–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kim KW. Characteristics of forklift accidents in Korean industrial sites. Work. 2021;68(3):679–687. doi:10.3233/WOR-203402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Endsley MR. Designing for situation awareness: an approach to user-centered design. New York (NY): CRC Press; 2016. p. 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):32–64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley MR. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Schnurer JH, Ingle DF, Downey CW, et al., editors. Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference; 1988 May 23–27; Dayton, OH, USA. New York: IEEE; 2003. p. 789–795.
   Google Scholar
• Jones DG, Endsley MR. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996;67(6):507–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton NA, Chambers PR, Piggott J. Situational awareness and safety. Saf Sci. 2001;39(3):189–204. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quoetone EM, Andra DL, Bunting WF, et al. Impacts of technology and situation awareness on decision making: operational observations from national weather Service warning forecasters during the historic may 3 1999 tornado outbreak. In: Chapter UM, editors. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting; 2001 Oct 8–12; Minneapolis, MN, USA. Minneapolis (MN): Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2001. p. 419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Yang J, Liang N, et al. Physiological measurements of situation awareness: a systematic review. Hum Factors. 2020:001872082096907. doi:10.1177/0018720820969071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant S, Kwon Y, Schnell T, et al. Evaluation of synthetic vision information system (SVIS) displays based on pilot performance. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Syst Conf Proc. 2001;1:2C1/1–2C1/12. doi:10.1109/dasc.2001.963328
   Google Scholar
• Moore K, Gugerty L. Development of a novel measure of situation awareness: the case for eye movement analysis. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2010;54:1650–1654. doi:10.1177/154193121005401961
   Google Scholar
• Van De Merwe K, Van Dijk H, Zon R. Eye movements as an indicator of situation awareness in a flight simulator experiment. Int J Aviat Psychol. 2012;22:78–95. doi:10.1080/10508414.2012.635129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer D, Oberhauser M, Bandow D. HUD Symbology evaluation in a virtual reality flight simulation. In: Mercer J, Holladay J, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 14th International conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace; 2014 Jul 30–Aug 1; Santa Clara, CA, USA. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2014. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dini A, Murko C, Yahyanejad S, et al. Measurement and prediction of situation awareness in human-robot interaction based on a framework of probabilistic attention. In: Burgard W, Inaba M, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2017 Sep 24–28; Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 4354–4361.
   Google Scholar
• Paletta L, Dini A, Murko C, et al. Towards real-time probabilistic evaluation of situation awareness from human gaze in human-robot interaction. In: Mutlu B, Tscheligi M, et al., editors. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction; 2017 Mar 6–9; Vienna Austria. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. p. 247–248.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh S, Esmaeili B, Dodd MD. Examining the relationship between construction workers’ visual attention and situation awareness under fall and tripping hazard conditions: using mobile eye tracking. J Constr Eng Manage. 2018;144:04018060. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyle EM, Gourley JJ, Kang Z, et al. Investigating the relationship between eye movements and situation awareness in weather forecasting. Appl Ergon. 2020;85:103071. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaber DB, Riley JM, Endsley JM, et al. Measuring situation awareness in virtual environment-based training. Mil Psychol. 2013;25(4):330–344. doi:10.1037/h0095998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley MR. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):65–84. doi:10.1518/001872095779049499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon P, Stanton N, Walker G, et al. Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. Appl Ergon. 2006;37(2):225–238. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg DN, Folles K, Strand-Volden F, et al. Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control rooms. Ergonomics. 1995;38:2394–2413. doi:10.1080/00140139508925275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas E, Prince C, Baker DP, et al. Situation awareness in team performance: implications for measurement and training. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):123–136. doi:10.1518/001872095779049525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews MD, Beal SA. Assessing situation awareness in field training exercises. New York: Army Research Institute for the Behavioural and Social Sciences; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Wanyan X, Zhuang D. Modeling the situation awareness by the analysis of cognitive process. Bio-Med Mater Eng. 2014;24:2311–2318. doi:10.3233/BME-141044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CS, Wang EM, Li WC, et al. Pilots’ visual scan patterns and situation awareness in flight operations. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014;85(7):708–714. doi:10.3357/ASEM.3847.2014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sturre L, Chiappe D, Vu K-PL, et al. Using eye movements to test assumptions of the situation present assessment method. In: Yamamoto S. (Ed.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Knowledge in Context: 17th International Conference, HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2015 August 2–7. Cham: Springer; Proceedings, Part II, 2015. p. 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley MR. Direct measurement of situation awareness: validity and use of SAGAT. Situational awareness. New York (NY): Routledge; 2017. p. 129–156.
   Google Scholar
• Choi M, Ahn S, Seo J. VR-based investigation of forklift operator situation awareness for preventing collision accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;136:105404. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Winter JCF, Eisma YB, Cabrall CDD, et al. Situation awareness based on eye movements in relation to the task environment. Cogn Technol Work. 2019;21:99–111. doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0527-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugerty L. Situation awareness in driving. In: Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine, and Psychology. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 2011; 19-1–19-10.
   Google Scholar
• Ratwani RM, Mccurry JM, Trafton JG. Single operator, multiple robots: An eye movement based theoretic model of operator situation awareness. In: Pamela Hinds, Hiroshi Ishiguro, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction; 2010 Mar 2; Osaka Japan. New York: IEEE Press; 2010. p. 235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang SQ, Chen WJ, Kang YT. Correlation evaluation of pilots’ situation awareness in bridge simulations via eye-tracking technology. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021;2021:1–15. doi:10.1155/2021/7122437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran L, Crookes A, Lansdown TC. Driver situation awareness – investigating the effect of passenger experience. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2019;61:152–162. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2017.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar