Investigation of non-fatal occupational accidents and their causes in Turkish shipyards

References

• Nugroho CW, Pitana T, Dinariyana B. Risk analysis using job safety analysis–fuzzy integration for ship maintenance operation. IPTEK J Tech Sci. 2021;31(3): 327–342. doi:10.12962/j20882033.v31i3.5655
   Google Scholar
• Kim WK, Park SJ, Lim HS, et al. Safety climate and occupational stress according to occupational accidents experience and employment type in shipbuilding industry of Korea. Saf Health Work. 2017;8(3):290–295 doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukalas VD, Fragiadakis NG. Prediction of occupational risk in the shipbuilding industry using multivariable linear regression and genetic algorithm analysis. Saf Sci. 2016;83:12–22. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwańkowicz RR, Rosochacki W. Clustering risk assessment method for shipbuilding industry. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2014;114(9):1499–1518. doi:10.1108/IMDS-06-2014-0193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacinto C, Silva C. 2010. A semi-quantitative assessment of occupational risks using bow-tie representation. Saf Sci. 2010;48(8):973–979. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh DSQ. Can we reduce workplace fatalities by half?. Saf Health Work. 2012;3(2):104–109. doi:10.5491/SHAW.2012.3.2.104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acuner O, Cebi S. An effective risk-preventive model proposal for occupational accidents at shipyards. Brodogradnja. 2016;67(1):67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman MB, Pitana T, Septianto AB. Identification of occupational accident relations of shipyard labour in terms of individual and workplace factors. Int J Mar Eng Innovation Res. 2009;3(4):134–140.
   Google Scholar
• Seker S, Recal F, Basligil H. A combined DEMATEL and grey system theory approach for analyzing occupational risks: a case study in Turkish shipbuilding industry. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2017;23(6):1340–1372. doi:10.1080/10807039.2017.1308815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventikos NP, Giannopoulos IF. Assessing the consequences from marine accidents: introduction to a risk acceptance criterion for Greece. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2013;19(3):699–722. doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.691398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marhavilas PK, Koulouriotis DE. Risk-acceptance criteria in occupational health and safety risk-assessment – the state-of-the-art through a systematic literature review. Saf. 2021;7(4):77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh JH, Koh T, Seo K. Design of a shipboard outside communication network and its testbed using PLC: for safety management during the ship building process. Processes. 2018;6(6):67. doi:10.3390/pr6060067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Roh MI, Ham SH. Underactuated crane control for the automation of block erection in shipbuilding. Autom. 2021;124:103573.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong BY. Prevalence of occupational accidents and factors associated with deaths and disabilities in the shipbuilding industry: comparisons of novice and skilled workers, Work. 2021;69(3): 997–1005. doi:10.3233/WOR-213530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cebi S, Ilbahar E. Proposing fuzzy bow-tie method for assessment of occupational risks at shipyards. J ETA Maritime Sci. 2018;6(2):141–157.
   Google Scholar
• Gundogdu FK, Seyfi-Shishavan SA. Occupational risk assessment using spherical fuzzy safety and critical effect analysis for shipyards. J ETA Maritime Sci. 2021;9(2):110–119. doi:10.4274/jems.2021.59480
   Google Scholar
• Costa B, Jacinto C, Teixeira AP, et al. Causal analysis of accidents at work in a shipyard complemented with Bayesian nets modelling. In: Guedes Soares C, Santos TA, editor. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Maritime Technology and Engineering (MARTECH 2018); 2018 May 7–9; Lisbon, Portugal. Boca Raton, (FL): CRC Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Barlas B. Shipyard fatalities in Turkey. Saf Sci. 2012;50(5):1247–1252. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyildiz H, Barlas B. Risk analysis methods in terms of occupational health and safety in shipyards. Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University, Department of Ocean Engineering; 2015. (Report DEN2015/02). Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Barlas B, Izci FB. Individual and workplace factors related to fatal occupational accidents among shipyard workers in Turkey. Saf Sci. 2018;101:173–179. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manage Sci. 1986; 32:841–855. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper ‘Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process’. Manage Sci 1990: 36: 259–268. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur J Oper Res. 2003;145:85–91. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli M. Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. In: SpringerBriefs in Operations Research. London: Springer, 2015. p. 21–32. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12502-2
   Google Scholar
• Barlas B. Occupational fatalities in shipyards: an analysis in Turkey. Brodogradnja. 2012;63(1):35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas B, Ozsoysal R, Bayraktalkatal E, et al. A study on the identification of fire hazards on board: a case study. Brodogradnja. 2017;68(4):71–87. doi:10.21278/brod68405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso JA, Lamata MT. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Int J Uncertain Fuzz. 2006;14(4):445–459. doi:10.1142/S0218488506004114
   Google Scholar
• Ayci T, Barlas B. Characteristics of non-fatal occupational accidents in shipyards. In: Alkan AD, editor. Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Ship and Marine Technology 2016 “Green Technologies”; UCTEA Turkish Chamber of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers; 2016 December 8–9; İstanbul. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ersoy M. A proposal on occupational accident risk analysis: a case study of a marble factory. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 2015;21(8):2099–2125. doi:10.1080/10807039.2015.1017878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz K. Occupational health and safety and prevention of occupational accidents in shipyards: Tuzla shipyards. Report. Ankara: The Research Centre for Work Education and Social Security, Ministry of Family, Labor and Social Services; 2012. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Kantermann T, Haubruge D, Skene DJ. The shift-work accident rate is more related to the shift type than to shift rotation. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2013;19(6):1586–1594. doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.708263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar