Sensitivity Analysis in Multicriteria Spatial Decision-Making: A Review

REFERENCES

• Arentze , TA , Borgers , AWJ and Timmerman , HJP. 1996 . “ Integrating GIS into planning process ” . In Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS , Edited by: Fisher , M , Scholten , HJ and Unwin , D . pp 187 – 98 . London, , UK : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Armacost , R and Pet-Edwards , J. 1999 . Integrative risk and uncertainty analysis for complex public sector operational systems . Socio-Economic Planning Sciences , 33 : 105 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Banai , R. 1993 . Fuzziness in Geographical Information Systems: Contributions from the analytic hierarchy process . International J Geographical Information Systems , 7 : 315 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barba-Romero , S and Pomerol , JCH. 1997 . “ Decisiones multicriterio ” . In Fundamentos teóricos y utilización práctica , Alcalá de Henares, , Spain : Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá .
   Google Scholar
• Barredo , JI. 1996 . Sistemas de Información Geográfica y Evaluación Multicriterio en la ordenación del territorio , Madrid, , Spain : Ra-Ma .
   Google Scholar
• Beuthe , M , Eeckhoudt , L and Scannella , G. 2000 . A practical multicriteria methodology for assessing risky public investments . Socio-Economic Planning Sciences , 34 : 121 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Biermann , S. 1999 . “ The strategic identification of suitable land for low income housing: A case study from South Africa ” . In Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making and Analysis: A Geographic Information Sciences Approach , Edited by: Thill , JC . pp 199 – 221 . Aldershot, Hampshire, , UK : Ashgate Publishing Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Bobba , AG , Singhi , VP and Bengtson , L. 2000 . Application of environmental models to different hydrological systems . Ecol Modelling , 125 : 15 – 49 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojórquez-Tapia , L , Díaz-Mondragón , S and Gómez-Priego , P. 1999 . “ GIS-approach for land suitability assessment in developing countries: A case study of forest development project in Mexico ” . In Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making and Analysis. A geographic information sciences approach , Edited by: Thill , JC . pp 335 – 52 . Aldershot : Ashgate Publishing Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Bosque-Sendra , J and García , RC . 2000 . El uso de los sistemas de información geográfica en la planificación territorial . Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense , 20 : 49 – 67 .
   Google Scholar
• Butler , J and Olson , D. 1999 . Comparison of centroid and simulation approaches for selection sensitivity analysis . Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis , 8 : 146 – 61 .
   Google Scholar
• Charnpratheep , K , Zhou , Q and Garner , B. 1997 . Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy Geographical Information Systems . Waste Management & Res , 15 : 197 – 215 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collette , S and Installé , M. 1994 . “ Tools for multicriteria decision making in a multi-actor context that may be applied to a hazardous plant location problem ” . In Computer Support for Environmental Impact Assessment , Edited by: Guariso , G and Page , B . pp 169 – 75 . North-Holland, , The Netherlands : Elsevier Science B.V. .
   Google Scholar
• Collins , G , Kremer , JN and Valiela , I. 2002 . Assessing uncertainty in estimates of nitrogen loading to estuaries for research, planning, and risk assessment . Environ Management , 25 : 635 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• Colorni , A , Laniado , E and Muratori , S. 1999 . Decision support systems for environmental impact assessment of transport infrastructures . Transportation Res , : 1 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Cray , WJ , Harris , TM and Wein , D. 002 . Community participation and GIS , London, , UK : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Crosetto , M and Tarantola , S. 2001 . Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: Tools for GIS-based model implementation . International J Geographical Information Sci , 15 : 415 – 37 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosetto , M , Tarantola , S and Saltelli , A. 2000 . Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS . Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment , 81 : 71 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosetto , M , Moreno , RuizJA and Crippa , B. 2001 . Uncertainty propagation in models driven by remotely sensed data . Remote Sensing of Environ , 76 : 373 – 437 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosetto , M , Crosetto , F and Tarantola , S. 2002 . Optimised resource allocation for GIS-based model implementation . Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing , 68 : 225 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai , FC , Lee , CF and Zhang , XH. 2001 . GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: A case study . Engineering Geology , 61 : 257 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DECISION PAD (Apian Software). 2004. Information available at http://www.apian.com/software/dpad.htm
   Google Scholar
• Emmi , PC and Horton , CA. 1996 . “ Seismic risk assessment, accuracy requirements, and GIS-based sensitivity analysis ” . In GIS and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Research Issues , Edited by: Goodchild , MF , Steyaert , LT and Parks , BO . pp 191 – 5 . Fort Collins, CO, , USA : GIS World Books .
   Google Scholar
• Erkut , E and Moran , SR. 1991 . Locating obnoxious facilities in the public sector: An application of the analytic Hierarchy process to municipal landfill siting decisions . Socio-Economic Planning , 25 : 89 – 102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Expert Choice (Expert Choice Inc.). 2004 . Information available at
   Google Scholar
• Forgionne , G and Frager , Y. 1998 . Dynamic public policy making through decision support systems . Socio-Economic Planning Sciences , 32 : 239 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham , AS and Wegener , M. 2000 . Spatial Models and GIS , London, , UK : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Greenland , S. 2001 . Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment . Risk Analysis , 21 : 579 – 83 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakanson , L. 2000 . The role of characteristic coefficients of variation in uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, with examples related to the structuring of lake eutrophication models . Ecol Modelling , 131 : 1 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Hofer , E. 1999 . Sensitivity analysis in the context of uncertainty analysis for computationally intensive models . Computer Physics Communications , 117 : 21 – 34 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter , GJ. 2001 . “ Keynote Address: Spatial Data Quality Revisited ” . In Geo 2001 Symposium , Brazil : Rio de Janiero . October 4–5
   Google Scholar
• Hwang , D , Karimi , HA and Byun , DW. 1998 . Uncertainty analysis of environmental models within GIS environment . Computers & Geosciences , 24 : 119 – 30 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isukapalli , SS , Roy , A and Georgopoulos , PG. 2000 . Efficient sensitivity/uncertainty analysis using the combined stochastic response surface method and automated differentiation: Application to environmental and biological systems . Risk Anal , 20 : 591 – 602 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski , P. 1995 . Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods . International J Geographical Information Systems , 9 : 251 – 73 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski , P and Nyerges , T. 2001 . “ Geographic Information Systems for Group Decision Making ” . In Towards a Participatory, Geographic Information Science , London, , UK : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski , P , Nyerges , TL Smith , A . 1997 . Spatial group choice: A SDSS tool for collaborative spatial decision-making . International J Geographical Information Sci , 11 : 577 – 602 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joerin , F , Thériault , M and Musy , A. 2001 . Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment . International J Geographical Information Sci , 15 : 153 – 74 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston , J. 1999 . “ Geography and GIS ” . In et al Geographical Information Systems , Edited by: Longley , PA , Goodchild , MF and Maguire , DJ . pp 39 – 47 . New York, NY, , USA : John Wiley & Sons, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Killen , J. 1983 . Mathematical Programming Methods for Geographers and Planners , New York, NY, , USA : Croom Helm .
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther , H , Fitzgerald , K and Aarts , T. 1993 . Siting noxious facilities: A test of the facility siting credo . Risk Anal , 13 : 301 – 15 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin , H , Wan , Q Chen , J . 1997 . GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for investment environment . Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design , 24 : 403 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodwick , W. 1989 . “ Developing confidence limits on errors of suitability analysis in GIS ” . In The Accuracy of Spatial Databases , Edited by: Goodchild , MF and Gopal , S . pp 69 – 78 . London, , USA : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Lowry , JH , Miller , HJ and Hepner , GF . 1995 . A GIS-based sensitivity analysis of community vulnerability to hazardous contaminants on the Mexico/US border . Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing , 61 : 1347 – 59 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukasheh , AF , Droste , RL and Warith , MA. 2001 . Review of Expert Systems (ES), Geographic Information System (GIS), Decision Support System (DSS), and their applications in landfill design and management . Waste Management & Res , 19 : 177 – 85 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski , J. 1999 . GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , New York, , USA : John Wiley & Sons, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski , J , Moreno-Sanchez , R Bojórquez-Tapia , LA . 1997 . Environmental conflict analysis in the Cape Region, Mexico . J Environ Planning and Manage , 40 : 349 – 74 .
   Google Scholar
• Mareschal , B. 1988 . Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid . European J Operational Res , 33 : 54 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , N , ST-Onge , B and Waaub , JP. 1999 . “ Geographic tools for decision making in watershed management ” . In Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making and Analysis. A Geographic Information Sciences Approach , Edited by: Thill , JC . pp 309 – 34 . Aldershot, Hampshire, , UK : Ashgate Publishing Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Massam , B. 1991 . The location of waste transfer stations in Ashdod, Israel, using a multi-criteria Decision Support System . Geoforum , 22 : 27 – 37 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microqualiflex (Kluwer Academic Publishers). 2004 . Information available at
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell , B. 2002 . Use of the most likely failure point method for risk estimation and risk uncertainty analysis . J Hazardous Materials , 91 : 1 – 24 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohanty , S and Wu , Y-T . 2001 . CDF sensitivity analysis technique for ranking influential parameters in the performance assessment of the proposed high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA . Reliability Engineering & System Safety , 73 : 167 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin , DM. 1999 . “ GDSS in highway planning: Their use and adoption ” . In Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making and Analysis. A Geographic Information Sciences Approach , Edited by: Thill , JC . pp 149 – 74 . Aldershot, Hampshire, , UK : Ashgate Publishing Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Nijkam , P and Spronk , J. 1980 . Multiple Criteria Analysis: Operational Methods Aldershot, Hampshire, , UK
   Google Scholar
• Pannell , J. 1997 . Sensitivity Analysis of normative economic models: Theoretical framework and practical strategies . Agricultural Econ , 16 : 139 – 52 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira , JM and Duckstein , L. 1993 . A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation . International J Geographical Information Systems , 7 : 407 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit , C and Pullar , D. 1999 . An integrated planning tool based upon multiple criteria evaluation of spatial information . Computers, Environ, Urban Systems , 23 : 339 – 57 .
   Google Scholar
• Proll , LG , Salhi , A and Ríos , InsuaD. 2001 . Improving an optimization-based framework for sensitivity analysis in multi-Criteria decision-making . J Multi-Criteria Decision Anal , 10 : 1 – 9 .
   Google Scholar
• PROMCALC (Service de Mathématiques de la Gestion, Université Libre de Bruxelles). 2004 . Information available at
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi , ME , Harrison , SR and Wegener , MK. 1999 . Validation of multicriteria analysis models . Agricultural Systems , 62 : 105 – 16 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards , D and Rowe , WD. 1999 . Decision-making with heterogeneous sources of information . Risk Anal , 19 : 69 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• Ríos , InsuaD , Martín , J Proll , LG . 1997 . Sensitivity analysis in statistical decision theory: A decision analytic view . J Statistical Computation and Simulation , 57 : 197 – 218 .
   Google Scholar
• Ríos , InsuaD , Gallego , E Mateos , A . 2000 . MOIRA: A decision support system for decision making on aquatic ecosystems contaminated by radioactive fallout . Annals Operations Res , 95 : 341 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Romero , R. 1993 . Teoría de la decisión multicriterio: Conceptos, técnicas y aplicaciones , Madrid, , Spain : Alianza Universidad .
   Google Scholar
• Saaty , TL. 1980 . The Analytic Hierarchy Process , New York, NY, , USA : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli , A. 2000 . “ What is sensitivity analysis? ” . In Sensitivity Analysis , Edited by: Saltelli , A , Chan , K and Scott , EM . pp 3 – 13 . Chichester, , UK : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli , A , Tarantola , S and Chan , K. 1999 . A role for sensitivity analysis in presenting the results from MCDA studies to decision makers . J Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis , 8 : 139 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli , A , Chan , K and Scott , EM. 2000 . Sensitivity Analysis , Chichester, , UK : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui , MZ , Everett , JW and Vieux , BE. 1996 . Landfill siting using Geographic Information Systems: A demonstration . J Environ Engineering , 122 : 515 – 23 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Store , R and Kangas , J. 2001 . Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling . Landscape and Urban Planning , 55 : 79 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarantola , S , Giglioli , N Jesinghaus , J . 2002 . Can global sensitivity analysis steer the implementation of models for environmental assessments and decision-making? . Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess , 16 : 63 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tristán , E , Demetriades , A Ramsey , MH . 2000 . Spatially resolved hazard and exposure assessments: An example of lead in soil at Lavrion, Greece . Environ Res Section A , 82 : 33 – 45 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardoulakis , S , Fisher , BEA González-Flesca , N . 2002 . Model sensitivity and uncertainty analysis using roadside air quality measurements . Atmospheric Environ , 36 : 2121 – 34 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogd , H. 1983 . Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning , London, , UK : Pion Limited .
   Google Scholar
• Witlox , F and Timmermans , H. 2000 . MATISSE: A knowledge-based system for industrial site selection and evaluation . Computers, Environ Urban Systems , 24 : 23 – 43 .
   Google Scholar
• Yeh , AG-O . 1999 . “ Urban planning and GIS ” . In Geographical Information Systems , Edited by: Longley , PA , Goodchild , MF and Maguire , DJ . pp 877 – 88 . New York, NY, , USA : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Zio , E and Apostolakis , GE. 1999 . Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis within a methodology for evaluating environmental restoration technologies . Computer Physics Communications , 117 : 1 – 10 .
   Google Scholar