A New Approach Toward Natural and Anthropogenic Risk Assessment of Gas Power Plants

REFERENCES

• Aaronson J. 2005. Contingency Planning: Best Practices. Sponsored by Omniture. Available at http://www.clickz.com/3495956 (accessed April 8, 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Amiri M, Zandieh M, Vahdani B, et al. 2010. An integrated eigenvector–DEA–TOPSIS methodology for portfolio risk evaluation in the FOREX spot market. Expert Systems with Applications 37:509–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anisseh M, Yusuff RM, and Shakarami A. 2009. Aggregating group MCDM problems using a fuzzy Delphi model for personnel performance appraisal, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University Putra, Malaysia. Scientific Res and Essay 4(5):381–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgharpour MJ. 2008. Multi Criteria Decision Making. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, Iran
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh A and Mohammad Fam I. 2009. Integrated M HSEE management systems for industry: A case study in gas refinery. J Chin Inst Engineers 32(2):235–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini M, and Braglia M. 2006. Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract. Internat J Proj Manage 24:422–30
   Google Scholar
• Black D. 1976. Partial justification of the Borda count. Public Choice 28:1–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen WM. 1990. Subjective judgments and data environment analysis in site selection. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 14:133–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimren E, Catay E, and Budak B. 2007. Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP. Internat J Advanced Manufact Technol 35:363–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dag˘deviren M, Yavuz S, and Kılınç N. 2009. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications 36:8143–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson JK. 1992. Contingency planning for emergencies. Planning Volume:82–9
   Google Scholar
• Dodangeh J, Yusuff R, and Jassbi J. 2010. Using TOPSIS method with goal programming for best selection of strategic plans in BSC Model. J Am Sci 6(3):136–42
   Google Scholar
• Eastman JR. 2006. IDRISI Andes. Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ghodsipour SH. 2000. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), 2nd edit. Amirkabir University of Technology (AUT) Press Center, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Jozi SA, Shafiee M, MoradiMajd N, et al. 2012. An integrated Shannon's Entropy–TOPSIS methodology for environmental risk assessment of Helleh protected area in Iran. Environ Monit Assess 184:6913–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartam NA, Flood I, and Koushki P. 2000. Construction safety in Kuwait: Issues, procedures, problem, and recommendation. Safety Sci 36(3):163–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiker GA, Linkove I, and Bridges TS. 2007. Integrating comparative risk assessment and multicriteria decision analysis. Environmental security in harbors coastal area. NATO Security through Science Series 37:51
   Google Scholar
• Krejcie RV and Morgan DW. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educat Psycholog Measure 30:607–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulas J and Stachowski A. 2009. Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings. J Res Personality 43:489–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy J. 2005. Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:438–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov I, Satterstrom F, Kiker G, et al. 2006. From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent development and applications. Environ Internat 32:1072–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low SP, and Pong CY. 2003. Integrating ISO 9001 and OHSAS 18001 for construction. J Construction Engineer Manage ASCE 129(3):338–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig L, and Starr S. 2005. Library as place: Results of a Delphi study. J Med Library Assoc 93(3):315–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodzadeh S, Shahrabi J, Pariazar M, et al. 2007. Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. Internat J Hum Soc Sci l1:333–8
   Google Scholar
• McNamara C. 1998. Brief Overview of Contemporary Theories in Management. Free Management Library. Authenticity Consulting, LLC:1998–2009. Available at http://www.managementhelp.org/mgmnt/htm
   Google Scholar
• Ngai EWT. 2003. Selection of web sites for online advertising using the AHP. Informat Manage 40:233–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikoomaram H, Mohammadi M, Javad Taghipourian M, et al. 2009. Training performance evaluation of administration sciences instructors by fuzzy MCDM approach. Contemp Engineer Sci 2:559–75
   Google Scholar
• Onut S, and Soner S. 2008. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Manage 28:1552–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic S, and Hshiung TG. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Euro J Operation Res 156:445–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipattanapiwong J. 2004. Development of Multi-Party Risk and Uncertainty Process for an Infrastructure Project, PhD Thesis. Kochi University, Kochi, Japan
   Google Scholar
• PMBOK. 2000. A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge. Project Management Institute, 2000 Edition. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Pollock JL. 2001. Some Logical Conundrums for Decision-Theoretic Contingency Planning. Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, Tempe, AZ, USA. Available at http://oscarhome.socsci.arizona.edu/ftp/PAPERS/DT%20 Contingency%20Planning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi ME, and Harrison SR. 2003. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to riparian revegetation policy options, small- scale forest economics. Manage Policy 2(3):441–58
   Google Scholar
• Saari DG. 1994. Geometry of Voting, vol 3. Studies in Economic Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Saari DG, and Merlin V. 1996. The Copeland method I: Relationships and the dictionary. Econ Theory 8:51–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Sachdeva A, Kumar D, and Kumar P. 2009. Multi-factor failure mode critically analysis using TOPSIS. J Indust Engineer Internat 5(8):1–9
   Google Scholar
• Santos SDFR, and Cabral S. 2005. FMEA and PMBOK applied to project risk management. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management,5 (2):347–64
   Google Scholar
• Sarkis J, and Talluri S. 2004. Evaluating and selecting e-commerce software and communication systems for a supply chain. Euro J Operat Res 159:318–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic B, Medeiros Y, and Faria A. 2004. An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resources Manage 18:35–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Contingency Planning and Disaster Recovery (CPDR) Guide. 2002. Available at http://www. Contingency_ planning _ disaster _recovery guide.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• The Ultimate Middle East Business Resource (UMEBR). 2005. Asset Management and Contingency Planning. Available at http://www.amenfo.com
   Google Scholar
• Tsaur S, and Wang C. 2007. The evaluation of sustainable tourism development by analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy set theory: An empirical study on the Green Island in Taiwan. Asia Pacific J Tourism Res 12(2):127–45
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). 2002. Accounting and Information Management. Contingency Planning. Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Zayed T, Amer M, and Pan J. 2008. Assessing risk and inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. Internat J Project Manage 26:408–19
   Google Scholar
• Zhijun T, Jiquan Z, and Xingpeng L. 2009. GIS-based risk assessment of grassland fire disaster in western Jilin province. China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:463–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar