296
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Environmental Health Risk Perception of a Nationwide Sample of Taiwan College Students Majoring in Engineering and Health Sciences

, &
Pages 307-326 | Received 06 Nov 2013, Published online: 21 Aug 2014

REFERENCES

  • Bickerstaff K. 2004. Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environ Internat 30:827–40
  • Bickerstaff K and Walker G. 2001. Public understandings of air pollution: The “localisation” of environmental risk. Global Environ Chang 11:133–45
  • Boholm A. 1998. Comparative studies of risk perception: A review of twenty years of research. J Risk Res 1:135–63
  • Bostrom A. 1997. Risk perceptions: “Experts” vs. “Lay People”. Duke Enviro Law & Policy Forum 8:101–13
  • Bouyer M, Bagdassarian S, Chaabanne S, et al. 2001. Personality correlates of risk perception. Risk Anal 21:457–65
  • Bronfman NC, Cifuentes LA, and Gutierrez VV. 2008. Participant-focused analysis: Explanatory power of the classic psychometric paradigm in risk perception. J Risk Res 11:735–53
  • Cha YJ. 2000. Risk perception in Korea: A comparison with Japan and the United States. J Risk Res 3:321–32
  • Chauvin B, Hermand D, and Mullet E. 2007. Risk perception and personality facets. Risk Anal 27:171–85
  • Davidson DJ and Freudenburg WR. 1996. Gender and environmental risk concerns—A review and analysis of available research. Environ Behav 28:302–39
  • Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, et al. 2000. Gender, race, and perceived risk: The “white male” effect. Health Risk Soc 2:159–72
  • Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, et al. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of altitudes towards technical risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9:127–52
  • Flynn J, Slovic P, and Mertz CK. 1994. Gender, race and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Anal 12:417–29
  • Keown CF. 1989. Risk perceptions of Hong Kongese vs. Americans. Risk Anal 9:401–5
  • Kpanake L, Chauvin B, and Mullet E. 2008. Societal risk perception among African villagers without access to the media. Risk Anal 28:193–202
  • Kraus NN and Slovic P. 1988. Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk—Modeling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains. Risk Anal 8:435–55
  • Lai C and Tao J. 2003. Perception of environmental hazards in Hong Kong Chinese. Risk Anal 23:669–84
  • Liu JT, Hammitt JK, Wang JD, et al. 2005. Valuation of the risk of SARS in Taiwan. Health Econ 14:83–91
  • Marris C, Langford I, Saunderson T, et al. 1997. Exploring the ‘‘psychometric paradigm’’: Comparisons between aggregate and individual analyses. Risk Anal 17:303–12
  • Neto F and Mullet E. 2001. Societal risks as seen by Chinese students living in Macao. J Risk Res 4:63–73
  • Pidgeon NF, Hood C, Jones D, et al. 1992. Risk analysis, perception and management. Royal Society Study Group, London, UK
  • Polit DF and Beck CT. 2006. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 29:489–97
  • Roberts L. 1990. Counting on science at EPA. Science 249:616–8
  • Rohrmann B. 1994. Risk perception of different societal groups—Australian findings and crossnational comparisons. Aust J Psychol 46:150–63
  • Siegrist M and Cvetkovich G. 2000. Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Anal 20:713–9
  • Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, et al. 2007. Laypeople's and experts’ perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal 27:59–69
  • Sjöberg L. 1996. A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiat Protect Dosim 68:219–25
  • Sjöberg L. 2003. Distal factors in risk perception. J Risk Res 6:187–211
  • Sjöberg L, Moen B and Rundmo T. 2004. Explaining Risk Perception: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Paradigm in Risk Perception Study. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Slovic P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236:280–5
  • Slovic P, Fischhoff B, and Lichtenstein S. 1980. Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? Plenum, New York, NY, USA
  • Slovic P, Flynn JH, and Layman M. 1991. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science 254:1603–7
  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1987. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. Office of Policy Analysis, Washington, DC, USA
  • Vaughan E and Nordenstam B. 1991. The perception of environmental risks among ethnically diverse groups. J Cross Cult Psychol 22:29–60
  • WHO (World Health Organization). 2004. Cumulative Number of Reported Probable Cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Available at http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/ (accessed March 2014)
  • Willis HH, DeKay ML, Fischhoff B, et al. 2005. Aggregate, disaggregate, and hybrid analyses of ecological risk perceptions. Risk Anal 25:405–28
  • Wilson R and Crouch EAC. 1987. Risk assessment and comparisons—An introduction. Science 236:267–70
  • Yen NS and Tsai FC. 2007. Risk perception in Taiwan. Asian J Soc Psychol 10:77–84
  • Zhai G and Suzuki T. 2009. Risk perception in Northeast Asia. Environ Monit Assess 157:151–67
  • Zhang L, He G, Mol A, et al. 2013. Public perceptions of environmental risk in China. J Risk Res 16:195–209

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.