Risk-Based Methodology for Pre-Evaluation of Environmental Technologies for Sustainable Revitalization of Post-Industrial Sites

REFERENCES

• ACT CLEAN (National Contact Point for Eco-efficient Technologies and Management Systems). 2013. Data Base of SPIN and ACT CLEAN Technologies and Tools. Available at http://actclean.gig.eu/en/technologies/ (accessed September 30, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• AIRMIC (Association of Insurance and Risk Managers). 2002. A Risk Management Standard. National Forum for Risk Management in the Public Sector (ALARM), Institute of Risk Management (IRM), London, UK
   Google Scholar
• COM (Commission Communication). 2004. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Stimulating Technologies for Sustainable Development: An Environmental Technologies Action Plan for the European Union. Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• EFFECT (Dialogue Platform on Energy and Resource Efficiency in the Baltic Sea Region). 2012. Description of the Project. Available at http://www.cbss.org/environment-and-sustainability/baltic-21-lighthouse-projects/ (accessed September 30, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme). 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the Voluntary Participation by Organisations in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC. . Official Journal of the European Union L342/2, Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Goedkoop M, Effting S, and Collignon M. 2002. The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Manual for Designers. Second Edition. PRé Consultants B.V., Amersfoort, Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Guinee JB. 2002. Handbook on life cycle assessment: Operational guide to the ISO standards. Internat J LCA 7(5): 311–3
   Google Scholar
• ISO (International Standards Organization) 14001: 2004. Environmental Management Systems - Requirements with Guidance for Use. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14044:2006. Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines. International Standards Organization. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• ISO 31000:2009. Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines. International Standards Organization. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14031:2013. Environmental Management—Environmental Performance Evaluation—Guidelines. International Standards Organization. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14045:2012. Environmental Management—Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Product Systems—Principles, Requirements and Guidelines. International Standards Organization. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• ISO IWA 9. 2011. International Workshop Agreement—Framework for Managing Sustainable Development in Business Districts. IWA9:2011 (E). International Standards Organization. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• JEMAI (Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry). 2004. Eco-efficiency and Factor Handbook for Products. Environmental Management Association for Industry (JEMAI)—Environmental Management Promotion Department, Eco-efficiency Research Center, Tokyo, Japan. Available at http://lca-forum.org/english/eco/ (accessed September 30, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Krzyzak J. 2010. The use of lignite and grass species for chemophytostabilization of soils heavy polluted with metals. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference Innovative Solutions for Revitalisation of Degraded Areas, Wisla, October 7–9, 2009, pp 117–125 . Podziemnego and Instytut Terenew Uprzemysłowionych, Ledziny-Katowice, Poland
   Google Scholar
• LONGLIFE-INVEST (The Implementation of the Planned Lithuanian Longlife Pilot Project as a Dormitory for Klaipeda University). 2012. Description of the Project. Available at http://longlife-invest.eu/jml/ (accessed September 30, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Lonsdale J, Peacock M, Shembavnekar N, et al. 2011. Detailed Assessment of the Market Potential, and Demand for an EU ETV Scheme. Contract No. DG BUDG No BUDG06/PO/01/LOT no. 1 ABAC 101931-EU ETV Scheme. European Policy Evaluation Consortium (EPEC), Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Michelsen O, Magerholm Fet AM, and Dahlsrud A. 2006. Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: A case study of furniture production. J Environ Manage 79:290–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RESCUE (Regeneration of European Sites in Cities and Urban Environment). 2004. Contract EVK4-CT-2001–00068—Report: Sustainability Assessment Tool for Brownfield Regeneration Projects. . Brussel, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Saling P, Kicherer A, Dittrich-Kramer B. et al. 2002. Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: The Method. Internat J LCA 7(4):203–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokół WA. 2010. Risk management approach to meet the demand on ecoefficient technologies for sustainable revitalisation of brownfields. Poster Presentation during the 20th Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, Water, and Energy. San Diego, CA, USA, March 15–18
   Google Scholar
• Sokół WA. 2011. Biogas in Regional Environmental Management System. Eco-Energetics-Biogas and Syngas. Technologies, Legal Framework, Policy and Economics in Baltic Sea Region, pp 31–40. Edited by Gdanska Wyższa Szkoła Administracji, Gdańsk, Poland
   Google Scholar
• UN AGENDA 21. 1992. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, June 3–14
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program. 2003. Case Studies: Demonstrating Program Outcomes. EPA/600/R-06/001. National Risk Management Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, USA
   Google Scholar