Evaluation of Heavy Metals and Associated Health Risks in a Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant's Sludge for Its Land Application

REFERENCES

• Ankara Development Agency. 2013. İstatistiklerle Ankara (Ankara with statistics). Ankara, Turkey
   Google Scholar
• Ankara Water and Sewerage Administration. 2014. Available at http://www.aski.gov.tr/tr/anasayfa (accessed February 15, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• APHA (American Public Health Association), AWWA (American Water Works Association), WEF (Water Environment Federation). 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater, 21st edit, part 3–10. Port City Press, Baltimore, MD, USA
   Google Scholar
• Bibby K and Peccia J. 2013. Identification of viral pathogen diversity in sewage sludge by metagenome analysis. Environ Sci Technol 47(4):1945–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright DA and Healey N. 2003. Contaminant risks from biosolids land application: Contemporary organic contaminant levels in digested sewage sludge from five treatment plants in greater Vancouver, British Columbia. Environ Pollut 126(1):39–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao HB and Ikeda S. 2000. Exposure assessment of heavy metals resulting from farmland application of wastewater sludge in Tianjin, China: The examination of two existing national standards for soil and farmland-used sludge. Risk Anal 20(5):613–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao QM, Yu QM, and Connell DW. 2011. Health risk characterization for environmental pollutants with a new concept of overall risk probability. J Hazard Mater 187(1–3):480–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis BS and Birch GF. 2011. Spatial distribution of bulk atmospheric deposition of heavy metals in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. Water Air Soil Poll 214(1–4):147–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 1986. Council Directive (EC) of 12 June 1986 on the Protection of the Environment, and in Particular of the Soil, When Sewage Sludge is Used in Agriculture (86/278/EEC). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/sludge/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2000. Working Document on Sludge, 3rd Draft. ENV.E.3/LM. Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2001. Pollutants in Urban Wastewater and Sewage Sludge, Final Report. ISBN 92–8941735–8. . Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2010. Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts of the Use of Sewage Sludge on Land, Final Report, Part iii: Project Interim Report. DG ENV.G.4/ETU/2008/0076r. Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen GS, Amundsen CE, Bernhoft A, et al. 2009. Risk Assessment of Contaminants in Sludge Applied on Norwegian Soils. Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety, Oslo, Norway
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Delgado M, Rodriguez-Cruz MS, Lorenzo LF, et al. 2007. Seasonal and time variability of heavy metal content and of its chemical forms in sewage sludges from different wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 382(1):82–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasco G and Lobo MC. 2007. Composition of a Spanish sewage sludge and effects on treated soil and olive trees. Waste Manage 27(11):1494–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay G. 2008. Public Health Risk Assessment of Sludge Landspreading, Final Report. DRC-07-81117-09289-C. French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks (INERIS), France
   Google Scholar
• Goyer R. 2004. Issue Paper on the Human Health Effects of Metals. Eastern Research Group Inc., Lexington, MA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Harrison EZ, McBride MB, and Bouldin DR. 2007. Land application of sewage sludges: An appraisal of the US Regulations. Internat J Environ Pollut 11(1):1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs LW and McCreary DS. 2001. Utilizing Biosolids on Agricultural Land. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, MI, USA. . Available at https://www.msu.edu/∼warncke/E2781% 20Utilizing%20Biosolids%20on%20Agricultural%20Land.pdf. (accessed May 13, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Jarup L. 2003. Risks of heavy metal contamination. Brit Med Bull 68:167–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansas Department of Health and Environment. 2010. Risk–based Standards for Kansas, Risk Manual, 5th version. Bureau of Environmental Remediation, Kansas, KS, USA. Available at http://www.kdheks.gov/remedial/download/RSK_Manual_10.pdf (accessed May 13, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Karvelas M, Katsoyiannis A, and Samara C. 2003. Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in the wastewater treatment process. Chemosphere 53(10):1201–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentel E, Aksoy A, Buyuker B, et al. 2011. Challenges in development and implementation of health-risk-based soil quality guidelines: Turkey's experience. Risk Anal 31(4):657–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li QS, Chen Y, Fu HB, et al. 2012. Health risk of heavy metals in food crops grown on reclaimed tidal flat soil in the Pearl river estuary, China. J Risk Mater 227:148–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatra K, Ramteke DS, Paliwal LJ, et al. 2013. Agronomic application of food processing industrial sludge to improve soil quality and crop productivity. Geoderma 207:205–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man YB, Sun XL, Zhao YG, et al. 2010. Health risk assessment of abandoned agricultural soils based on heavy metal contents in Hong Kong, the world's most populated city. Environ Internat 36(6):570–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North East Biosolids and Residuals Association (NEBRA). 2007. A National Biosolids Regulation, Quality, End Use & Disposal Survey. Available at http://www.nebiosolids.org/ (accessed August 9, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. National Academy Press. Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2002. Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Planquart P, Bonin G, Prone A, et al. 1999. Distribution, movement and plant availability of trace metals in soils amended with sewage sludge composts: Application to low metal loadings. Sci Total Environ 241(1–3):161–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PURE (Project on Urban Reduction of Eutrophication). 2012. Good Practice in Sludge Management. Union of the Baltic Cities Environment Commission, Turku, Finland
   Google Scholar
• Qu CS, Sun K, Wang SR, et al. 2012. Monte Carlo simulation-based health risk assessment of heavy metal soil pollution: A case study in the Qixia mining area, China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 18(4):733–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schowanek D, Carr R, David H, et al. 2004. A risk-based methodology for deriving quality standards for organic contaminants in sewage sludge for use in agriculture—Conceptual framework. Regul Toxicol Pharm 40(3):227–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RP and Agrawal M. 2008. Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge. Waste Manage 28(2):347–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization. 2010. The Regulation Regarding the Use of Domestic and Urban Sewage Sludge on Soil. Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Ankara, Turkey
   Google Scholar
• UN-HABITAT (United Nations Human Settlements Programme). 2008. Global Atlas of Excreta, Wastewater Sludge, and Biosolids Management: Moving Forward the Sustainable and Welcome Uses of a Global Resource. HS/1030/08E. Nairobi, Kenya
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). EPA/540/1-89/002. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1992. Technical Support Document for Land Application of Sludge, Volume 1. EPA/822-R-93-001. Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1993. Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge, 40 C.F.R. Sect. 503. Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1994. A Plain English Guide to the EPA Part 503 Biosolids Rule. EPA/832/R-93/003. Office of Wastewater Management, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1995. A Guide to Biosolids Risk Assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule. EPA/832-B-93-005. Office of Wastewater Management, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2007. Concepts, Methods and Data Sources for Cumulative Health Risk Assessment of Multiple Chemicals, Exposures and Effects: A Resource Document. EPA/600/R-06/013f. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2014. IRIS, Integrated Risk Information System. Available at http://www.epa.gov/iris. (accessed February 26, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Wang LK, Shammas NK, and Hung Y. 2009. Handbook of Environmental Engineering.Vol.9, Advanced Biological Treatment. Humana Press, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Yi YJ, Yang ZF, and Zhang SH. 2011. Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediment and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in fishes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze river basin. Environ Pollut 159(10):2575–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying QY, Higman J, Thompson J, et al. 2002. Characterization and spatial distribution of heavy metals in sediment from Cedar and Ortega rivers subbasin. J Contam Hydrol 54(1–2):19–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabin S, Foaad MA, and Al-Ghamdi A. 2008. Non-carcinogenic risk assessment of heavy metals and fluoride in some water wells in the Al-Baha region, Saudi Arabia. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 14(6):1306–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar