Are all risk perceptions created equal? Comparing general risk assessments and specific risk assessments associated with climate change

References

• Anderson AA, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, et al. 2013. The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. J Comp-Med Comm 19(3):373–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt C, Chinowsky P, Robinson S, et al. 2012. Economic development under climate change. Rev Develop Econ 16(3):369–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaji MR and Heiphetz L. 2010. Attitudes. In: Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, and Lindzey G (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, vol, pp 353–93. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff K. 2004. Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environ Internat 3(6):827–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies A, Green Lee D, Lindsey C, et al. 2013. Citizens, nonprofits and climate change policy. Nonprof Pol Forum 4(1):5–28
   Google Scholar
• Blum SC, Cohen Silver R, and Poulin MJ. 2014. Perceiving risk in a dangerous world: Associations between life experiences and risk perceptions. Soc Cogn 32(3):297–314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom A. 1997. Risk perceptions: Experts vs. laypeople. Duke Environ Law Pol Forum 8:101–13
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom A, Granger MM, Baruch F, et al. 1994. What do people know about global climate change? 1. mental models. Risk Analy 14(6):959–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, et al. 2008. Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40(1):72–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley H. 2000. Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia. Public Understanding Sci 9(3) 313–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns WJ and Slovic P. 2010. Predicting and modeling public response to a terrorists strike. In: Slovic P (ed), The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception, pp 285–306. Earthscan, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Cifuentes L, Borga-Aburto VH, Gouveia N, et al. 2001. Hidden health benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation. Science 293(5533):1257–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich G and Nakayachi K, 2007. Trust in a high-concern risk controversy: A comparison of three concepts. J Risk Res 10(2):223–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Durant RF and Legge JS Jr, 2005. Public opinion, risk perceptions, and genetically modified food regulatory policy: reassessing the calculus of dissent among European citizens. European Union Pol 6(2):181–200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham DP, Casman EA, and Albert SM. 2012. Deriving behavior model parameters from survey data: Self-protective behavior adoption during the 2009–2010 Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. Risk Analy 32(12):2020–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly AH and Chaiken S. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX, USA
   Google Scholar
• Edelman M. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA
   Google Scholar
• English MR. 1992. Siting Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities: The Public Policy Dilemma. Quorum, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Evans G and Durant J. 1995. The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Publ Understanding Sci 4(1):57–74
   Google Scholar
• Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, et al. 2000. Gender, race and perceived risk: The “white-male” effect. Health, Risk Soc 2(2):159–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, et al. 1978. How safe is safe enough: A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. Pol Sci 9(2):127–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn J, Slovic P, and Mertz CK. 1993. The Nevada initiative: A risk communication fiasco. Risk Analy 13(5):497–502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin H, Hess J, Luber G, et al. 2008. Climate change: the public health response. Am J Public Health 98(3):435–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates DM. 1993. Climate Change and its Biological Consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, UK
   Google Scholar
• Hansen J, Holm L, Frewer L, et al. 2003. Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite 41(2):111–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humair F, Kueffer C, and Siegrist M. 2014. Are non-native plants perceived to be more risky? Factors influencing horticulturists’ risk perceptions of ornamental plant species. PLoS One 9(7):e102121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson GC. 2011. The Republican resurgence in 2010. Pol Sci Q 126(1): 27–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan DM, Braman D, Gastil J, et al. 2007. Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. J Empirical Legal Stud 4(3):465–505
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, et al. 2003. The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, and Slovic P (eds), The Social Amplification of Risk, pp 13–46. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, and Vedlitz A. 2008. Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analy 28(1):113–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempton W. 1997. How the public views climate change. Environ: Sci Pol Sustain Devel 39(9):12–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz A. 2006. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77(1):45–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz A, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, et al. 2013. Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behav Sci 57(6):818–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löftstedt RE and Horlick-Jones T. 1999. Environmental regulation in the UK: Politics, institutional change, and public trust. In: Cvetkovich G and Löftstedt RE (eds), Social Trust and the Management of Risk, pp 73–88. Earthscan, London, UK
   Google Scholar
• Long SJ. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Lubell M, Zahran S, and Vedlitz A. 2007. Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. Pol Behav 29(3): 391–413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malka A, Krosnick JA, and Langer G. 2009. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analy 29(5):633–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh P and Nelder JA. 1989. General Linear Models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL, USA
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey RD, and Zavoina W.1975. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. J Math Sociol 4(1):103–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn R and Neumann JA (eds). 2004. The Impact of Climate Change on the United States Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
   Google Scholar
• Miller JM and Krosnick JA. 2000. News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. Amer J Pol Sci 44:301–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumpower JL, Shi L, Stoutenborough JW, et al. 2013. Psychometric and demographic predictors of the perceived risk of terrorism threats and the willingness-to-pay for risk management programs. Risk Analy 33(10):1802–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien KL and Leichenko RM. 2000. Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environ Change 10(3):221–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor RE, Bord RJ, and Fisher A. 1999. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analy 19(3):461–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes N. 2004. Beyond the ivory tower: The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306(5702):1686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters H. 2000. From information to attitudes? Thoughts on the relationship between knowledge about science and technology and attitudes toward technologies. In: Dierkes M and von Grote C (eds), Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology, pp 182–96. Harwood Academic, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Robinson SE, Liu X, and Stoutenborough JW, et al. 2013. Explaining popular trust in the Department of Homeland Security. J Pub Admin Res Theory 23(3):713–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig C and Parry ML. 1994. Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 367(6459):133–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield TA, Mertz CK, and Slovic P. 2004. Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk. Risk Analy 24(1):115–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele U. 1992. Topic interest and levels of text comprehension. In: Renninger KA, Hidi S, and Krapp A (eds), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, pp 151–82. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 2000. The Perception of Risk. Earthscan, London, UK
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, et al. 2004. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analy 24(2):311–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Flynn JH, and Layman M. 1991. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science 254(5038):1603–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, MacGregor DG, and Kraus NN. 1987. Perception of risk from automobile safety defects. Accident Analysis & Prevention 19(5):359–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P and Monahan JH. 1995. Probability, danger and coercion: A study of risk perception and decision-making in mental health law. Law Hum Behav 19(1):49–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Peters E, Grana J, et al. 2007. Risk perception of prescription drugs: Results of a national survey. Drug Inf J 41(1):81–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW, Bromley-Trujillo R, and Vedlitz A. 2014a. Public support for climate change policy: Consistency in the influence of values and attitudes over time and across distinct policy alternatives. Rev Pol Res 31(6):555–83
   Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW, Bromley-Trujillo R, and Vedlitz A. 2015b. How to win friends and influence people: Climate scientists' perspectives on their relationship with and influence on government officials. J Publ Pol 35(2):269–96
   Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW, Sturgess SG, and Vedlitz A. 2013. Knowledge, risk, and policy support: Public perceptions of nuclear power. Energy Pol 62(11):176–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW and Vedlitz A. 2012. Public opinion and climate-related policy solutions: a comparison of the policy preferences of the public, stakeholders, and climate scientists. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, USA
   Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW and Vedlitz A. 2014. The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns: An empirical comparison. Environ Sci Pol 37(March): 23–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW and Vedlitz A. 2015. The role of scientific knowledge in the public's perceptions of energy technology risks. ISTPP Working Papers, http://bush.tamu.edu/istpp/scholarship/workingpapers/
   Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW, Vedlitz A, and Liu X. 2014b. Trends in public attitudes toward climate change: The influence of the economy and Climategate on risk, information, and public policy. Risk, Haz Crisis Publ Pol 5(1):22–37
   Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JW, Vedlitz A, and Liu X. 2015a. The influence of specific risk perceptions on public policy support: An examination of energy policy. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 658(1):102–20
   Google Scholar
• Tam J and McDaniels TL. 2013. Understanding individual risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations in biological conservation. Environ Sci Pol 27(March):114–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenkorang EY and Maticka-Tyndale E. 2014. Assessing young people's perceptions of HIV risks in Nyanza, Kenya: Are school and community level factors relevant? Soc Sci Med 116(2014):82–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, et al. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416(6879):389–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh L. 2008. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioral response. J Risk Res 11(3):351–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R. 2006. Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata J 6(1):58–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne B. 1991. Knowledges in context. Sci Technol Hum Val 16(1):111–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne B. 1996. Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. In: Irwin A and Wynne B (eds), Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, pp 19–46. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Zahran S, Brody SD, Grover H, et al. 2006. Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc Nat Res 19(9): 771–789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar