Aquatic plants–based risk model for assessment of ecological safety of rivers

References

• Allan JD, Yuan LL, Black P, et al. 2012. Investigating the relationships between environmental stressors and stream condition using Bayesian belief networks. Freshwater Biol 57:58–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffrey JM, Monahan C, and Tierney D. 2006. Factors influencing the distribution of aquatic plant communities in Irish canals. Hydrobiologia 570:133–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camporeale C, Perucca E, Ridolfi L, et al. 2013. Modeling the interactions between river morphodynamics and riparian vegetation. Rev Geophys 51(3):379–414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceneviva-Bastos M and Casatti L. 2014. Shading effects on community composition and food web structure of a deforested pasture stream: Evidences from a field experiment in Brazil. Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 46:9–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colas F, Archaimbault V, and Devin S. 2011. Scale-dependency of macroinvertebrate communities: Responses to contaminated sediments within run-of-river dams. Sci Total Environ 409(7):1336–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC. Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. European Commission PE-CONS 3639/1/100 Rev 1. Luxembourg
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MT and Moreira I. 1999. River plants from an Iberian basin and environmental factors influencing their distribution. Hydrobiologia 415:101–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glińska-Lewczuk K and Burandt P. 2011. Effect of river straightening on the hydrochemical properties of floodplain lakes: Observations from the Łyna and Drwęca Rivers, N Poland. Ecol Eng 37:786–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grill G, Dallaire CO, Chouinard EF, et al. 2014. Development of new indicators to evaluate river fragmentation and flow regulation at large scales: A case study for the Mekong River Basin. Ecol Indic 45:148–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinberga L. 2010. Environmental factors influencing the species diversity of macrophytes in middle-sized streams in Latvia. Hydrobiologia 656:233–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachoł J and Bondar-Nowakowska E. 2011. Ecological risk classification in the regulated and conserved watercourses. Ecol Chem Eng A 18(12):1763–74
   Google Scholar
• Hachoł J and Bondar-Nowakowska E. 2012. Tendencies in the development of hydromacrophytes after the completion of regulatory and maintenance works in a river bed. Ecol Chem Eng A 19(9):997–1013
   Google Scholar
• Hall Jr. LW, Killen WD, Anderson RD, et al. 2009. The influence of physical habitat, pyrethroids, and metals on benthic community condition in an urban and residential stream in California. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 15:526–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris GP and Heathwaite AL. 2012. Why is achieving good ecological outcomes in rivers so difficult? Freshwater Biol 57:91–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison SSC, Pretty JL, Shepherd D, et al. 2013. The effect of instream rehabilitation structures on macroinvertebrates in lowland rivers. J Appl Ecol 41(6):1140–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries P, Keckeis H, and Finlayson B. 2014. The river wave concept: Integrating river ecosystem models. Bioscience 64:870–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozi SA, Saffarian S, and Shafiee M. 2012. Environmental risk assessment of a gas power plant exploitation unit using integrated TOP-EFMEA method. Pol J Environ Stud 21(1):95–105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler A. 1978. Methods of mapping the flora and vegetation of freshwater habitats. Landschaft und Stadt 10:73–85
   Google Scholar
• Köhler J, Hachoł J, and Hilt S. 2010. Regulation of submersed macrophyte biomass in a temperate lowland river: Interactions between shade by bank vegetation, epiphyton and water turbidity. Aquat Bot 92:129–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornijów R. 2009. Controversies around dam reservoirs: Benefits, costs and future. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 9:141–48
   Google Scholar
• Kõrs A, Vilbaste S, Käiro K, et al. 2012. Temporal changes in the composition of macrophyte communities and environmental factors governing the distribution of aquatic plants in an unregulated lowland river (Emajõgi, Estonia). Boreal Environ Res 17:460–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz AW, Korte T, Sundermann A, et al. 2012. Macrophytes respond to reach-scale river restorations. J Appl Ecol 49(1):202–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner VS and Gilvear DJ. 2012. Characterization of hydraulic habitat and retention across different channel types; introducing a new field-based technique. Hydrobiologia 694:219–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hare JM, O'Hare MT, Gurnell AM, et al. 2011. Physical constraints on the distribution of macrophytes linked with flow and sediment dynamics in British rivers. River Res Appl 27:671–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page T, Heathwaite AL, Moss B, et al. 2012. Managing the impacts of nutrient enrichment on river systems: Dealing with complex uncertainties in risk analyses. Freshwater Biol 57:108–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard CL. 2001. Risk Management - Concepts and Guidance. ESI International, Arlington, VA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Qian J, Zhang L-P, Wang W-Y, et al. 2014. Effects of vegetation cover and slope length on nitrogen and phosphorus loss from a sloping land under simulated rainfall. Pol J Environ Stud 23(3):835–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riis T, Suren AM, Clausen B, et al. 2008. Vegetation and flow regime in lowland streams. Freshwater Biol 53:1531–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkowski L. 2007. Key to Identification of Vascular Plants in Lowland Poland. PWN Scientific Publishing, Warszawa, Poland
   Google Scholar
• Schaumburg J, Schranz C, Stelzer D, et al. 2006. Instruction Protocol for the Ecological Assessment of Running Waters for Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive: Macrophytes and Phytobenthos. Bavarian Environment Agency, München, Germany
   Google Scholar
• Słowik M. 2011. Changes of river bed pattern and traces of anthropogenic intervention: The example of using GPR method (the Obra River, western Poland). Appl Geogr 31(2):784–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas Acharyulu PV and Seetharamaiah P. 2015. A framework for safety automation of safety-critical systems operations. Safety Sci 77:133–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szoszkiewicz K, Ferreira T, Korte T, et al. 2006. European river plant communities: The importance of organic pollution and the usefulness of existing macrophyte metrics. Hydrobiologia 566:211–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szoszkiewicz K, Zbierska J, Jusik S, et al. 2010. Macrophyte Method for River Assessment. A Methodological Manual for the Assessment and Classification of Ecological Status of Running Waters, Based on the Aquatic Plants. Bogucki Scientific Publishing, Poznań, Poland
   Google Scholar
• Tockner K, Robinson CT, and Uehlinger U. 2009. Rivers of Europe. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Vereecken H, Baetens J, Viaene P, et al. 2006. Ecological management of aquatic plants: Effects in lowland streams. Hydrobiologia 570:205–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Tian P, Mu X, et al. 2014. Quantifying the impact of climate variability and human activities on streamflow in the middle reaches of the Yellow River basin, China. J Hydrol 519:387–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar