Evaluation of exposure factors to support development of generic recreational reuse scenarios for land reclamation activities

References

• Australian Government Department of Health. 2016. Australian exposure factor guidance. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/A12B57E41EC9F326CA257BF0001F9E7D/$File/Aust-Exposure-Factor-Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brand E, Otte PF, Lijzen JPA. 2007. CSOIL 2000: an exposure model for human risk assessment of soil contamination. A Model Description. RIVM Report 711701054/2007. Avaialble at: https://rivm.openrepository.com/rivm/bitstream/10029/13385/1/711701054.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carlon C, D'Alessandro M, Swartjes F. 2007. Derivation methods of soil screening values in europe. A review and evaluation of national procedures towards harmonisation. JRC Scientific and Technical Report EUR 22805:1–320
   Google Scholar
• CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act). 1980. United States federal law
   Google Scholar
• CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act) Amendments. 1986. United States federal law
   Google Scholar
• Cook MB and Friedland M. 2005. Remediation and future land use: Incorporating reuse considerations into superfund activities. Remed J 15:111–119
   Google Scholar
• ECETOC (European Chemical Industry Ecology and Toxicology Centre). 1990. Hazard assessment of chemical contamiantns in soil. Tech report no. 40. ECETOC. Brussels. Available at: http://www.ecetoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ECETOC-TR-040.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECETOC (European Chemical Industry Ecology and Toxicology Centre). 2001. Technical report no. 79. Exposure factors sourcebook for european populations (with focus on UK data). Available at: http://www.ecetoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ECETOC-TR-079.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K and Robinson J. 2009. Average weekly time spent in 30 basic activities across 17 countries. Soc Indic Res 93:249–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamo M and Futatsumata M. 2006. Development of japanese exposure factors handbook. Epidemiology 17:S528–9
   Google Scholar
• George BJ and Mccurdy T. 2009. Investigating the American time use survey from an exposure modeling perspective. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:92–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Soil Protection Act. 1999. Germany
   Google Scholar
• ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2006. Technical and Regulatory Guidance. Planning and promoting ecological land reuse of remediated sites
   Google Scholar
• ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2008. Overview document. Use of risk assessment in management of contaminated sites
   Google Scholar
• Jang JY, Jo SN, Kim SJ, et al. 2008. Development of korean exposure factors handbook. Epidemiology 19:S214
   Google Scholar
• Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, et al. 2001. The national human activity pattern survey (NHAPs): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 11:231–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy T, Glen G, Smith L, Lakkadi Y. 2000. The national exposure research laboratory's consolidated human activity database. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 10:566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCRA (the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act). 1976. US federal law
   Google Scholar
• RCRA (the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Amendments. 1984. US federal law
   Google Scholar
• Stynes D and Daniel J. 2005. Economic significance of recreational uses of national parks and other public lands. National Park Service and US Department of the Interior. Available at: https://www.nature.nps.gov/socialscience/docs/archive/SSRR_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swartjes FA. 2002. Variation in Calculated Human Exposure. Comparison of Calculations with Seven European Human Exposure Models. RIVM Report 711701030/2002. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Taylor R and Langley A. 1998. Exposure Settings and Exposure Scenarios. National Environmental Health Forum Soils Monograph No. 2. Adelaide, South Australian Health Commission
   Google Scholar
• The Coleman Company Inc and the Outdoor Foundation. 2016. 2013 American camper report. Available at: http://www.outdoorfoundation.org/pdf/research.camping.2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Dow Chemical Company. 2006. Remedial Investigation work plan: Tittabawassee River and upper Saginaw River and floodplain soils Midland, Michigan. Volume 1 of 2
   Google Scholar
• UKEPA (UK Environmental Protection Agency). 2009a. Human health toxicological assessment of contaminants in soil. Science report: SC050021/SR2. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/291011/scho0508bnqy-e-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UKEPA (UK Environmental Protection Agency). 2009b. Updated technical background to the CLEA model. Science report: SC050021/SR3. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/291014/scho0508bnqw-e-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UKEPA (UK Environmental Protection Agency). 2009c. CLEA software (version 1.05) handbook. Science report: SC050021/SR4. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/455747/LIT_10167.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USACE/USEPA (US Army Corps of Engineer/US Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. Human health risk assessment GE/Housatonic River site rest of river. Volume IIIA Appendix B: Phase 2 direct contact risk assessment text and tables. DCN: GE-060603-ABPM
   Google Scholar
• USDL (US Department of Labor). 2016. American time use survey (ATUS) database and ATUS user's guidance. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/tus/
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Risk assessment guidance for superfund, vol. I, human health evaluation manual. Part a (interim final), EPA/540/1-89/002. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1991a. Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume i, human health evaluation manual (part b, development of risk -based preliminary remediation goals). OSWER Directive 92857-01B, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1991b. Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume i, human health evaluation manual (part c, risk evaluation of remedial alternatives). OSWER Directive 92857-01C, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Exposure factors handbook (1997 final report). EPA/600/P-95/002F a-c. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. Reusing superfund sites: Recreational use of land above hazardous waste containment areas. EPA 541-K-01-002 OSWER 92300-93. Office of emergency and remedial response Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. Example expsure scenarios. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC; EPA/600/R-03/036
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2004. Risk assessment guidance for superfund, vol. I, human health evaluation manual. Part E, supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment. EPA/540/R99/005
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2011. Exposure factors handbook 2011 edition (final). EPA/600/R-09/052F. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2016. Consolidated human activity database (CHAD-2000) and CHAD-2000 user manual. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/healthresearch/consolidated-human-activity-database-chad-use-human-exposure-and-health-studies-and
   Google Scholar
• Warren CS, Biddinger GR, Zaleski RT, et al. 2008. Poster presentation: Development and application of recreational, ecological and conservation reuse risk assessments for contaminated lands. SETAC North American Annual Conference, Tampa, FL
   Google Scholar