A combined DEMATEL and grey system theory approach for analyzing occupational risks: A case study in Turkish shipbuilding industry

References

• Akyuz E. 2015. A hybrid accident analysis method to assess potential navigational contingencies: The case of ship grounding. Saf Sci 79:268–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundrud Q and Aven T. 2015. On how to understand and acknowledge risk. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 142:42–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asok KA and Aoyama K. 2005. Risk management in modular ship hull construction considering indefinite nature of task, Paper ICCAS.
   Google Scholar
• Atua K. 2003. Schedule risk assessment in planning ship production. Alexandria Eng J 42(5):537–544.
   Google Scholar
• Azar A, and Ardakanib D. 2014. Application of grey-based DEMATEL technique in designing of the aggregate green supply chain management's model. Uncertain Supply Chain Manage 2:199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bai C and Sarkis J. 2013. A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors. Int J Prod Econ 146(2013):281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakacak M. 2007. Analysis of the shipbuilding and ship repair accidents. Master Thesis, Graduate Institute of Social Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Barlas B. 2012a. Occupational fatalities in shipyards: An analysis in Turkey. Brodogradnja 63(1):35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas B. 2012b. Shipyard fatalities in Turkey. Saf Sci 50(5):1247–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashiri E. 2010. Statistical analysis-driven risk assessment of criteria air pollutants: A sulfur dioxide case study. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 39:85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Basuki M, and dan Widjaja S. 2008. Studi Pengembangan Model Manajemen Risiko Usaha Bangunan Baru Pada Industri Galangan Kapal. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Produksi, Jurusan Teknik Perkapalan, FTMK ITATS.
   Google Scholar
• Basuki M and Setyoko T. 2009. Risiko Operasional Pada Proses Pembangunan Kapal FPB 38 Dengan Material Aluminium di PT. PAL Indonesia, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Kelautan, FTK, ITS.
   Google Scholar
• Basuki M, Manfaat D, Nugroho S, and Dinariyana A. 2012. Improvement of the process of new business of ship building industry. J Econ Business Account Ventura 15(2):187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Basuki M, Manfaat D, and Nugroho S. 2014. A. Probabilistic risk assessment of the shipyard industry using the bayesian method. Int J Technol 1:88–97. ISSN 2086-9614.
   Google Scholar
• Basuki M. 2009. A concept risk management model for ship construction process with externality factors. Proceeding Seminar Nasional Applied Technology and Arts, LPPM ITS.
   Google Scholar
• Buksa T, Pavletic D, and Sokovic M. 2010. Shipbuilding pipeline production quality improvement. J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng 40(2):160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Celebi U.B, Ekinci S, Alarcin F, and Unsalan D. 2010. The risk of occupational safety and health in shipbuilding industry in Turkey. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Maritime and Naval Science and Engineering, pp. 178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C. T. 2000. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J. 1982. Control problems of grey systems. Syst Control Lett 5:288–294.
   Google Scholar
• Disk-Limter. 2016. Number of fatalities in shipyards. Available at http://www.disk.org.tr>limter-is (last accessed: 20/11/2016).
   Google Scholar
• Duffey MR and Van Dorp J. R. 1999. Risk analysis for large engineering projects: modeling cost uncertainty for ship production activities. J Eng Valuat Cost Anal 2(4):285–301.
   Google Scholar
• Emovon I, Norman R, and Murphy A. 2016. An integration of multi-criteria decision making techniques with a delay time model for determination of inspection intervals for marine machinery systems. Appl Ocean Res 59:65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eunchang L, Yongtae P, and Jong G. S. 2009. Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network. Exp Syst Appl 36:5880–5887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontela E and Gabus A. 1976. The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 report. Switzerland, Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fu X, Zhu Q, and Sarkis J. 2010. A Grey-DEMATEL methodology for green supplier development program evaluation. Clark University, George Perkins Marsh Institute, WP2010–15.
   Google Scholar
• Garrick B. 1988. The approach to risk analysis in three industries: nuclear power, space systems, and chemical process. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 23(3):195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti S, Rigamown A, Satta F, and Senah M. 2007. Measuring value at risk in project finance transaction. Eur Financial Manage 13(1):135–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golcuk I and Baykasoglu A. 2016. An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP. Exp Syst Appl 46:346–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, and Vafadarnikjoo A. 2016. A grey DEMATEL approach to develop third-party logistics provider selection criteria. Ind Manage Data Syst 116(4):690–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. 2016. Occupatioanal injuries. Available at http://www.ilo.org › ILO home (last accessed: 29/07/2016).
   Google Scholar
• Iskanius P. 2009. The ERP project risk assessment—A case study. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kindinger JP and Darby JL. 2000. Risk factor analyis—A new qualitative risk management tool. Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Kruizinga A.G, Briggs D, Crevel RWR, and Knults A.C. 2008. Probabilistic risk assessment model for allergens in food sensitivity analysis of the minimum eliciting dose and food consumption. Food Chem Toxicol 46:1437–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E, Park Y, and Shin JG. 2009. Large engineering project risk management using a bayesian belief network. Exp Syst Appl 36(3):5880–5887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E, Shin JG, and Park Y. 2007. A statistical analysis of engineering project risk in the Korean Shipbuilding Industry. J Ship Prod 23(4):223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Li KX and Culinane K. 2003. An economic approach to maritime risk management and safety regulation. J Marit Econ Logist 5:268–284.
   Google Scholar
• Liang H, Ren J, Gao Z, Gao S, Luo X, Dong L, and Scipioni A. 2016. Identification of critical success factors for sustainable development of biofuel industry in China based on grey decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). J Cleaner Prod 131(10):500–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu BZ, and Tang AST. 2000. China shipbuilding management challenges in the 1980s. Marit Policy Manage 27(1):71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Mentes A, Akyildiz H, Yetkin M, and Türkoğlu N. 2015. A FSA based fuzzy DEMATEL approach for risk assessment of cargo shipsat coasts and open seas of Turkey. Saf Sci 79:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mierzwicki T, and Brown A.J. 2004. Risk metric for multi-objective design of naval ships. Naval Eng J 116(2):55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadshahi Y. 2013. A state-of-art survey on TQM applications using MCDM techniques. Decis Sci Lett 2:125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Moyst H and Das B. 2005. Factors affecting ship design and construction lead time and cost. J Ship Prod 21(3):186–194.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Council Working Party on Shipbuilding (WP6) The Shipbuilding Industry in Turkey. September 2011. Available at http://www.oecd.org/turkey/48641944.pdf (last accessed: 20/07/2016).
   Google Scholar
• Operational Safety & Health Administration. 2015. Shipbuilding and Ship Repair: Hazard and Solutions. Available at www.osha.gov(last accessed: 25/12/2016).
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan T and Tuysuz F. 2016. Modified grey relational analysis integrated with grey DEMATEL approach for the performance evaluation of retail stores. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 15(2):353–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir A and Tüysüz F. 2015. A grey-based DEMATEL approach for analyzing the strategies of universities: A case of Turkey. 6th Internatıonal Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization (CMSAO'15), Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkok M. 2013. Risk assesment in ship hull structure production using FMEA. Journal of Marine Science and Technology. doi: 10.6119/JMST-013–0222-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkok M. 2015. Rısk evaluation of pin jig work unit ın shipbuilding by using fuzzy ahp method. Brodogradnja/Shipbilding, ISSN 0007-215 × 2015, Volume 66(1).
   Google Scholar
• Ravi V and Rajesh R. 2015. Modeling enablers of supply chain risk mitigation in electronic supply chains: A Grey–DEMATEL approach. Comput Ind Eng 87:126–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Report of Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication. 2016. Available at http://www.ubak.gov.tr/BLSM_WIYS/UBAK/tr/HTML/new_html/20100406_154100_204_1_64.php (last accessed: 15/07/2016).
   Google Scholar
• Robu B, Gavrilescu M, and Macoveanu M. 2003. Risk assessment for a shipbuilding from romanian black sea coast. Environ Eng Manage J 2(4):303–316.
   Google Scholar
• Samson S, Reneke J, and Wiecek M. 2009. A review of different perspectives on uncertainty and risk and an alternative modeling paradigm. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):558–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satoh N, Kumamoto H, and Kino Y. 2008. Viewpoint of ISO GMITS and probabilistic risk assessment in information security. Int J Syst Appl Eng Dev 2(4):237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Shao J, Taisch M, Mier M, and d'Avolio E. 2014. Application of the DEMATEL method to identify relations among barriers between green products and consumers. 17th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ERSCP'14), Portoroz, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Shao J, Taisch M, and Mier M. 2016. A grey-decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) analysis on the barriers between environmentally friendly products and consumers: practitioners' viewpoints on the European automobile industry. J Cleaner Prod 112(4):3185–3194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinoda T, Tanaka T, and Kano Y. 2010. Risk analysis for occupational safety management in shipyard. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China, pp. 581–588.
   Google Scholar
• Silvanita M, Khamadi F, and John K. 2011. Critical review of a risk assessment method and its applications. International Conference on Financial Management and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Temme D, Kreis H, and Hildebrandt L. 2006. PLS Path Modeling: A Software Review. Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Tianshui W, and Gang Z. 2014. A new security and privacy risk assessment model for information systemconsidering influence relation of risk elements. 9th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng M. 2009. A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Exp Syst Appl 36:7738–7748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassalos D, Guarin J, and Konovessis D. 2006. Risk-based ship design: Concept', methodology and Framework. 3rd International ASRANet Colloquium, 10–12 July, Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wang MJJ, and Chang TC. 1995. Tool steel materials selection under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 72:263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei P.-L, Huang J.-H, Tzeng G.-H, and Wu S. 2010. Causal modeling of web- advertising effectis by improving SEM based on DEMATEL technique. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 9(5):799–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wreathall J and Nemeth C. 2004. Assessing risk: the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in patient safety improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 13:206–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu WW. 2010. Linking Bayesian networks and PL spath modeling for causal analysis. Exp Syst Appl 37(1):134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia X, Govindan K, and Zhu Q. 2015. Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. J Cleaner Prod 87(15):811–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao HL, Chun G, Lin SZ, Bai JX, and Sun HX. 2009. Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in shipyard Project investment risk recognition. Can Soc Sci 5(5):17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Yilmaz F, and Çelebi U. 2015. Analysis of shipyard accidents in Turkey. Br J Appl Sci Technol 5(5):472–481, Article no. BJAST.2015.045 ISSN: 2231–0843.
   Google Scholar