Linking fish consumption patterns and health risk assessment of mercury exposure in a coastal community of NW Mexico

References

• Basu N, Tutino R, Zhang Z, et al 2014. Mercury levels in pregnant women, children, and seafood from Mexico City. Environ Res 135:63–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla G, Abete MC, Binato G, et al 2013. Mercury occurrence in Italian seafood from the Mediterranean Sea and possible intake scenarios of the Italian coastal population. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 65:269–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, et al 2002. Development, validation and utilization of food frequency questionnaires: A review. Public Health Nutr 5:567–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission for Environmental Cooperation). 2011. North America Power Plant Air Emission. Montreal, Canada. p 80. IBSN:978-2-89700-009-7
   Google Scholar
• Chan HM, Scheuhammer AM, Ferran A, et al 2003. Impacts of mercury on freshwater fish-eating wildlife and humans. Human Ecol Risk Assess An Int J 9:867–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan HM. 2011. Mercury in fish: Human health risks. In: Nriagu JO (ed), Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, pp 697–704. Elsevier, Burlington
   Google Scholar
• Chien LC, Gao CS, and Lin HH. 2010. Hair mercury concentration and fish consumption: Risk and perceptions of risk among women of childbearing age. Environ Res 110:123–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado-Alvarez CG, Ruelas-Inzunza J, Osuna-López JI, et al 2015. Mercury content and their risk assessment in farmed shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei from NW Mexico. Chemosphere 119:1015–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez S. 2009. Human health effects of methylmercury exposure. Environ Contam Toxicol 198:111–32
   Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Jim RC, Hatley EL, et al 2015. A longitudinal study of mercury exposure associated with consumption of freshwater fish from a reservoir in rural south central USA. Environ Res 136:155–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM, et al 2013. Mercury as a global pollutant: Sources, pathway and effects. Environ Sci Technol 47:4967–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2014. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura. Oportunidades y desafíos. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura, Roma, 2014. p 274
   Google Scholar
• FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization). 2010. Report of the joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on the risks and benefits of fish consumption, FIPM/R978. p 63
   Google Scholar
• Freije A, and Awadh M. 2009. Total and methylmercury intake associated with fish consumption in Bahrain. Water Environ J 23:155–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Hernández J, Ortega MI, Contreras-Paniagua AD, et al 2013. Community-based monitoring of pollutants in the Gulf of California. Final Technical Report. For: North American Partnership for Environmental Community Action (NAPECA). p 56
   Google Scholar
• Grandjean P, Weihe P, and White RF. 1995. Milestone development in infants exposed to methylmercury from human milk. Neurotoxicology 16(1):27–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandjean P, Murata K, Budtz-Jørgensen E, et al 2004. Cardiac autonomic activity in methylmercury neurotoxicity: 14-year follow-up of a Faroese birth cohort. J Ped 144:169–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Canada. 2004. Federal Contaminated Site Risk Assessment in Canada Part I: Guidance on human health Preliminary Quantitative Risk Assessment (PQRA), Cat. H46-2/04-367E. Available at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/contamsite/risk-risque-eng.php
   Google Scholar
• Henry GT. 1990. Practical Sampling. An Introductory Text that Covers the Basics, Including Both Probability and Non-Probability Sampling Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
   Google Scholar
• INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía). 2013. Boletín de prensa No. 130/13. 10 de abril 2013 Culiacán. Página 1/8 estadística básica sobre medio ambiente. Datos de Sinaloa, Sinaloa
   Google Scholar
• Jara-Marini ME, Soto-Jiménez M, and Páez-Osuna F. 2010. Mercury transfer in a subtropical coastal lagoon food web (SE Gulf of California) under two contrasting climatic conditions. Environ Toxicol 526–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston JJ, and Snow JL. 2007. Population-based Fish Consumption Survey and Probabilistic Methylmercury Risk Assessment. USDA National Wildlife Research Center – Staff Publications. Paper 703
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Parker JD, Mendola P. 2010. Blood Lead and Mercury Levels in Pregnant Women in the United States, 2003–2008. National Center for Health Statistics No. 52
   Google Scholar
• Knobeloch L, Anderson HA, Imm P, et al 2005. Fish consumption advisory awareness, and hair mercury levels among women of childbearing age. Environ Res 97:220–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Barrera EA, and Barragán-Gonzalez RG. 2016. Metals and metalloid in eight fish species consumed by citizens of Bogota D.C., Colombia and potential risk to humans. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 79:232–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães MC, Costa V, Menezes GM, et al 2007. Intra- and inter-specific variability in total and methylmercury bioacumulation by eight marine fish species from the Azores. Mar Pollut Bull 54:1654–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrugo-Negrete JL, Ruiz-Guzmán JA, and Díez S. 2013. Relationship between mercury levels in hair and fish consumption in a population living near a hydroelectric tropical dam. Biol Trace Elem Res 151:187–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon HB, Kim SJ, Park H, et al 2011. Exposure assessment for methyl and total mercury from seafood consumption in Korea, 2005 to 2008. J Environ Monit 13(9):2400–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morriset T, Ramirez-Martinez A, Wesolek N, et al 2013. Probabilistic mercury multimedia exposure assessment in small children and risk assessment. Environ Int 59:431–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAS (National Research Council). 2000. Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• NOM-242-SSA1-2009 (Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-242-SSA1-2009). 2009. Productos y servicios. Productos de la pesca frescos, refrigerados, congelados y procesados. Especificaciones sanitarias y métodos de prueba
   Google Scholar
• Nunes E, Cavaco A, and Carvalho C. 2014. Exposure assessment of pregnant portuguese women to methylmercury through the ingestion of fish: Cross-sectional survey and biomarker validation. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A Curr Issu 77:133–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega MI, Quizán T, Morales GG, et al 1999. Cálculo de ingestión dietaria y coeficientes de adecuación a partir de registro de 24 horas y frecuencia de consumo de alimentos [Food consumption and diet adequation analysis: 24 hour-recall and food frequency questionnaires]. Serie Evaluación del Consumo de Alimentos 1:1–48
   Google Scholar
• Osuna-Martínez CC, Páez-Osuna F, and Alonso-Rodríguez R. 2010. Mercury in cultured oysters (Crassostrea gigas Thunberg, 1793 and C. corteziensis Hertlein, 1951) from four coastal lagoons of the SE Gulf of California, Mexico. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 85:339–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, et al 2010. Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmos Chem Phys 10(13):5951–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer AA, and Reimer RD. 1975. Total mercury in some fish and shellfish along the Mexican coast. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 14:105–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruelas-Inzunza J, and Páez-Osuna F. 2005. Mercury in fish and shark tissues from two coastal lagoons in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 74:294–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruelas-Inzunza J, Escobar-Sánchez O, Patrón-Gómez J, et al 2013. Mercury in muscle and liver of ten ray species from Northwest Mexico. Mar Pollut Bull 77:434–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruelas-Inzunza J, Meza-López G, and Páez-Osuna F. 2008. Mercury in fish that are of dietary importance from the coasts of Sinaloa (SE Gulf of California). J Food Comp Anal 21:211–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruelas-Inzunza J, Páez-Osuna F, Ruiz-Fernández C, et al 2011a. Health risk associated to dietary intake of mercury in selected coastal areas of Mexico. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 86:180–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruelas-Inzunza J, Patiño-Mejía C, Soto-Jiménez M, et al 2011b. Total Hg in canned yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares marketed in northwest Mexico. Food Chem Toxicol 49:3070–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruelas-Inzunza J, Sánchez-Osuna K, Amezcua-Martínez F, et al 2012. Mercury levels in selected bycatch fish species from industrial shrimp-trawl fishery in the SE Gulf of California. Mar Pollut Bull 64:2857–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Fernández AC, Frignani M, Hillaire-Marcel C, et al 2009. Trace metals (Cd, Cu, Hg, and Pb) accumulation recorded in the intertidal mudflat sediments of three coastal lagoons in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Est Coasts 32(3):551–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Guzmán JA, Marrugo-Negrete JL, and Díez S. 2014. Human exposure to mercury through fish consumption: Risk assessment of riverside inhabitants of the Urrá Reservoir, Colombia. Human and Ecol Risk Asses: An Int J 20:1151–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytuba JJ. 2003. Mercury from mineral deposits and potential environmental impact. Environ Geol 43(3):326–38
   Google Scholar
• SAGARPA (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Desarrollo Rural Pesca y Alimentación). 2013. Anuario estadístico de acuacultura y pesca. Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca. Impreso en México. p 299
   Google Scholar
• SE/SMG (Secretaría Economía/Servicio Geológico Mexicano). 2014. Panorama Minero del Estado de Sinaloa. Diciembre 2014. p 42
   Google Scholar
• Soto-Jiménez MF, Amezcua F, and González-Ledesma R. 2010. Nonessential metals in striped marlin and Indo-Pacific sailfish in the Southeast Gulf California, Mexico: Concentration and assessment of human health risk. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58:810–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinidad-Rodríguez I, Fernández-Ballart J, Cucó-Pastor G, et al 2008. Validación de un cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo alimentario corto: Reproducibilidad y validez. Nutr Hosp 23:242–52. ISSN 0212-1611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2013. Global Mercury Assessment 2013: Sources, Emissions, Releases and Environmental Transport. Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1997a. Exposure Factors Handbook. Final/Technical Report. Washington, DC. EPA/600/P-95/002
   Google Scholar
• US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1997b. Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Manual, Washington, D.C., EUA, 35 pp.EPA/630/R-97/001
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2000. Handbook for Non-cancer Health Effects Evaluation. Washington. Available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2001. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume III – Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment. Chapter 3 Using Probabilistic Analysis in Human Health Assessment. EPA 540-R-02-002 OSWER 9285.7-45 PB2002 963302. Available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/RAGS3A/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2011a. Revised Technical Support Document: National-scale Assessment of Mercury Risk to Populations with High Consumption of Self-caught Freshwater Fish. EPA-452/R-11-009
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2011b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume III – Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment. Chapter 3 Using Probabilistic Analysis in Human Health Assessment. EPA 540-R-02-002 OSWER 9285.7-45 PB2002 963302
   Google Scholar
• US EPA/FDA (US United States Environmental Protection Agency/Food and Drug Administration). 2014. Fish: What Pregnant Women and Parents Should Know. Draft updated advice by FDA and EPA. Available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/Metals/UCM400358.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WHO (Word Health Organization). 1990. Methylmercury. International Programme on Chemical Safety. Environmental Health Criteria 101. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2008. Guidance for Identifying Populations at Risk from Mercury Exposure. Issued by: UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch and WHO Departmentof Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodborne Diseases. August 2008, Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Nakai S, and Masunaga S. 2009. An exposure assessment of methyl mercury via fish consumption for the Japanese population. Risk Anal 29:1281–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar