An assessment methodology for human holistic risk in whole cycle of shale gas fracturing

References

• Akyuz E. 2016. Quantitative human error assessment during abandon ship procedures in maritime transportation. Ocean Eng 120:21–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz E, Celik M, and Cebi S. 2016. A phase of comprehensive research to determine marine-specific EPC values in human error assessment and reduction technique. Saf Sci 87:63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford T, Bayley C, and Revie M. 2013. Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of human reliability analysis. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 115(115):100–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglia F, Giardina M, and Tomarchio E. 2014. THERP and HEART integrated methodology for human error assessment. Radiat Phys Chem 116:262–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YHJ, and Mosleh A. 2007a. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents – Part 5: Dynamic probabilistic simulation of IDAC model. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 92(8):1076–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YHJ, and Mosleh A. 2007b. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents – Part 4: IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 92(8):1061–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YHJ, and Mosleh A. 2007c. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents – Part 3: IDAC operator response model. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 92(8):1041–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YHJ, and Mosleh A. 2007d. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents – Part 2: IDAC performance influencing factors model. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 92(8):1014–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YHJ, and Mosleh A. 2007e. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents – Part 1: Overview of the IDAC. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 92(8):997–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Q, and Liu X. 2014. Risk assessment of water security in Haihe River Basin during drought periods based on D-S evidence theory. Water Sci Eng 7(2):119–32.
   Google Scholar
• Du X, Zhang X, Zhang M, and Hou B. 2014. Risk synthetic assessment for deep pit construction based on evidence theory. Chin J Geotech Eng 36(1):155–61. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Ghalenoei M. 2007. Human error analysis among petrochemical plant control room operators with human error assessment and reduction technique. Iran Occup Health 6(2):38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Park J, and Jung W. 2017. A classification scheme of erroneous behaviors for human error probability estimations based on simulator data. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 163:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, and Pang F. 2013. An approach of vessel collision risk assessment based on the D-S evidence theory. Ocean Eng 74(7):16–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao P, Luo X, Wang T, and Su Y. 2016. The mechanism of how design failures cause unsafe behavior: The cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Procedia Eng 145:715–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marseguerra M, Zio E, and Librizzi M. 2006. Quantitative developments in the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) for the assessment of human performance. Ann Nucl Energy 33(10):894–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayasu H, Miyoshi T, Nakagawa M, and Abe H. 2010. Human cognitive reliability analysis on driver by driving simulator. In: 40th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering: Soft Computing Techniques for Advanced 25–28 July 2010. Awaji, Japan. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5668250/?reload=true
   Google Scholar
• Park KS, and Lee JI. 2008. A new method for estimating human error probabilities: AHP–SLIM. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 93(4):578–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquale VD, Miranda S, Iannone R, and Riemma S. 2015. A simulator for human error probability analysis (SHERPA). Reliability Eng Syst Saf 139:17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausand M. 2011. Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication, Hoboken, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro AC, Sousa AL, Duarte JP, and Melo PFFE. 2016. Human reliability analysis of the Tokai-Mura accident through a THERP–CREAM and expert opinion auditing approach. Saf Sci 87:269–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasou K, and Reason J. 1999. Team errors: Definition and taxonomy. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 65(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirley RB, Smidts C, Li M, and Gupta A. 2015. Validating THERP: Assessing the scope of a full-scale validation of the technique for human error rate prediction. Ann Nucl Energy 77:194–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu Y, Furuta K, and Kondo S. 2002. Team performance modeling for HRA in dynamic situations. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 78(2):111–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian B, Hu J, Wang H, and Li K. 2015. A structured method for identifying human error in shale gas fracturing. China Saf Sci J 25(2):128–34. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Tu J, Lin W, and Lin Y. 2015. A Bayes-SLIM based methodology for human reliability analysis of lifting operations. Int J Ind Ergon 45:48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield DJ. 1988. Application of the human cognitive reliability model and confusion matrix approach in a probabilistic risk assessment. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 22(1–4):295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yang J, and Sen P. 1995. Safety analysis and synthesis using fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 47:103–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JC, and Bell JL. 2015. Consolidation of the error producing conditions used in the human error assessment and reduction technique (HEART). Saf Reliability 35(3):26–76.
   Google Scholar
• Yang K, Tao L, and Bai J. 2014. Assessment of flight crew errors based on THERP. Procedia Eng 80:49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Yang P, and Liu W. 2002. Study on group decision making in the hierarchical evaluation process based on evidential reasoning. Syst Eng Electron 24(2):42–4.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Tong J, Liu T, and Yu Y. 2011. Integrating team factor into current human reliability analysis of nuclear power plant. Atomic Energy Sci Technol 45(8):966–71. (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Zwirglmaier K, Straub D, and Groth KM. 2017. Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 158:117–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar