Environment damage assessment: A literature review using social network analysis

References

• Adamowicz W, et al. 1997. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 32(1):65–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamowicz W, et al. 1998. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 80(1):64–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armbrecht J. 2014. Use value of cultural experiences: A comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost. Tourism Manage 42:141–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbier EB. 2007. Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ Policy 22(49):178–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal D. 1998. ‘A travel cost analysis of the value of Carnarvon Gorge National Park for recreational use’: Reprise. Australian J Agric Resour Econ 42(3):267–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram C and Larondelle N. 2017. Going to the woods is going home: Recreational benefits of a larger urban forest site – A travel cost analysis for Berlin, Germany. Ecol Econ 132:255–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaine TW, et al. 2015. An examination of sources of sensitivity of consumer surplus estimates in travel cost models. J Environ Manage 151:427–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey RK, et al. 2000. A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies. Ecol Econ 32(2):269–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall C, et al. 1996. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecol Econ 18(3):243–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr L and Mendelsohn R. 2003. Valuing coral reefs: A travel cost analysis of the Great Barrier Reef. Ambio 32(5):353–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson RT. 2000. Contingent valuation: A user's guide. Environ Sci Technol 34(8):1413–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson RT and Mitchell RC. 1993. The value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water. Water Resour Res 29(7):2445–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson RT, Flores NE, and Meade NF. 2001. Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environ Resou Econ 19(2):173–210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson RT, et al. 1996. Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: Comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Econ 72(1):80–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC. 2009. Environmental impact assessment framework by integrating scientific analysis and subjective perception. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6(4):605–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu WT and Ho YS. 2005. Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics 63(1):3–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang KY, Huang YL, and Ho YS. 2007. A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan. Scientometrics 72(2):201–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciriacy-Wantrup SV. 1947. Capital returns from soil-conservation practices. J Farm Econ 29(4):1181–1202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough WJ and Meister AD. 1991. Allowing for multiple-site visitors in travel cost analysis. J Environ Manage 32(2):115–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d'Arge R, and De Groot R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch GI, et al. 2009. Modelling consumer choice behaviour in space tourism. Tourism Manage 30(3):441–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings RG,   Brookshire DS, and Schulze WD. 1986. Valuing environmental goods: A state of the arts assessment of the contingent valuation method. Comunidad Valenciana 1986:557–70
   Google Scholar
• Czembrowski and Kronenberg J. 2016. Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape Urban Planning 146:11–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RK. 1963. The value of outdoor recreation: an economic study of Maine woods. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University
   Google Scholar
• Day B, Bateman I, and Lake I. 2007. Beyond implicit prices: Recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model. Environ Resour Econom 37(1):211–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs IM. 1993. Adjusting for sample selection bias in the individual travel cost method. J Agric Econ 44(2):335–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly WA. 1989. Hedonic price analysis of the effect of a floodplain on property values. Water Resour Bull 25(3):581–6
   Google Scholar
• Earnhart D. 2002. Combining revealed and stated data to examine housing decisions using discrete choice analysis. J Urban Econom 51(1):143–69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earnhart D. 2003. Do travel cost models value transportation properly? Transp Res Part D-Transport Environ 8(6):397–414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English DBK and Bowker JM. 1996. Sensitivity of whitewater rafting consumers surplus to pecuniary travel cost specifications. J Environ Manage 47(1):79–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes VE and Calow. 2013. Use of the ecosystem services concept in ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Integr Environ Assess Manage 9(2):269–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick KD, Major DC, and Stakhiv EZ. 1997. Water resources planning principles and evaluation criteria for climate change: Summary and conclusions. Climatic Change 37(1):291–313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Y, et al. 2009. Study on regional flood risk assessment system. J Catastrophology 24(3):27–32
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons S, Mourato S, and Resende GM. 2014. The amenity value of English nature: A hedonic price approach. Environ Resour Econ 57(2):175–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givnish TJ, et al. 2014. Adaptive radiation, correlated and contingent evolution, and net species diversification in Bromeliaceae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 71:55–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman LR, et al. 1985. Low birth weight, prematurity and birth defects in children living near the hazardous waste site, Love Canal. Hazard Waste Hazard Mater 2(2):209–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan D, and Su W. 2006. Studies on urban ecosystem health and its assessment indexes system. Res Soil Water Conserv 13(5):70–3
   Google Scholar
• Guo X, et al. 2014. Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in Beijing, China. Energy Policy 68:340–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley N, Wright RE, and Adamowicz V. 1998. Using choice experiments to value the environment – Design issues, current experience and future prospects. Environ Resource Econ 11(3–4):413–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley N, Wright RE, and Alvarez-Farizo B. 2006. Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: An application to the water framework directive. J Environ Manage 78(2):183–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasiak RJ, et al. 1984. Effect of sodium nitrite and sodium erythorbate on the chemical, sensory, and microbiological properties of water-added turkey ham. Poult Sci 63(7):1364–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helle I, et al. 2015. A probabilistic approach for a cost-benefit analysis of oil spill management under uncertainty: A Bayesian network model for the Gulf of Finland. J Environ Manage 158:122–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher D, Louviere J, and Swait J. 1999. Combining sources of preference data. J Econometrics 89(1–2):197–221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz O and Spann M. 2008. The impact of information diffusion on bidding behavior in secret reserve price auctions. Inf Syst Res 19(3):351–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz JK and McConnell KE. 2002. A review of WTA/WTP studies. J Environ Econ Manage 44(3):426–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huibin Z and Danping ZUO. 2006. Some problems on the application of travel cost method in China. J Natural Resour 21(3):489–99
   Google Scholar
• Jack BK, Leimona B, and Ferraro J. 2009. A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: Use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia. Conserv Biol 23(2):359–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SL, Safadi H, and Faraj S. 2015. The emergence of online community Leadershi. Inf Syst Res 26(1):165–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane GC and Alavi M. 2008. Casting the net: A multimodal network perspective on user-system interactions. Inf Syst Res 19(3):253–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz EE and Labuza T. 1981. Effect of water activity on the sensory crispness and mechanical deformation of snack food products. J Food Sci 46(2):403–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy J. 1998. ‘A travel cost analysis of the value of Carnarvon Gorge National Park for recreational use’: Comment. Australian J Agric Resour Econ 42(3):263–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry CE. 2011. Coastal erosion as a natural resource management problem: An economic perspective. Coastal Manage 39(3):259–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leftheriotis I and Giannakos MN. 2014. Using social media for work: Losing your time or improving your work? Comput Human Behav 31:134–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W and Li W. 2003. Using a modified travel cost method to evaluate the recreational benefits of Jiuzhaigou nature reserve. Acta Sci Naturalium Univ Pekinensis 39(4):548–55
   Google Scholar
• Li L, et al. 2009. Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics 80(1):39–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis J, et al. 2009. A hybrid individual-zonal travel cost model for estimating the consumer surplus of golfing in Colorado. J Sports Econ 10(2):155–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, et al. 2014. Geographically weighted regression with a non- Euclidean distance metric: A case study using hedonic house price data. Int J Geograph Inf Sci 28(4):660–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallapragada G, Grewal R, and Lilien G. 2012. User-generated open source products: Founder's social capital and time to product release. Marketing Sci 31(3):474–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvig RL, et al. 2015. Convergent evolution and adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa within patients with cystic fibrosis. Nature Genet 47(1):57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews Y, Scarpa R, and Marsh D. 2017. Stability of willingness-to-pay for coastal management: A choice experiment across three time periods. Ecol Econ 138:64–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. 1994. Contingent valuation and social choice. Am J Agric Econ 76(4):689–708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeltner K. 2003. Addressing aggregation bias in zonal recreation models. J Environ Econ Manage 45(1):128–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina JC, and Chotro MG. 1989. Acute alcohol intoxication paired with aversive reinforcement: Ethanol odor as a conditioned reinforcer in rat pups. Behav Neural Biol 52(1):1–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison M, et al. 2002. Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer. Am J Agric Econ 84(1):161–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller N, et al. 2015. Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. Prev Med 76:103–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuteleers S, and Engelen B. 2015. Talking money: How market-based valuation can undermine environmental protection. Ecolog Econ 117:253–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, and van den Bergh J. 2001. Economic valuation of biodiversity: Sense or nonsense? Ecol Econ 39(2):203–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbi SR, et al. 2009. Managing for ocean biodiversity to sustain marine ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 7(4):204–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirdavani A, et al. 2013. Evaluating the road safety effects of a fuel cost increase measure by means of zonal crash prediction modeling. Accid Anal Prev 50:186–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzol M, et al. 2015. Monetary valuation in life cycle assessment: A review. J Cleaner Product 86:170–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope JC. 2008. Buyer information and the hedonic: The impact of a seller disclosure on the implicit price for airport noise. J Urban Econ 63(2):498–516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyo H-D, Park C-H, and Jeong JH. 2008. Estimating consumer surplus for recreational sea fishing using individual travel cost method. Ocean Polar Res 30(2):141–8
   Google Scholar
• Richardson L, et al. 2015. The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation. Ecol Econ 115:51–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridker RG. 1969. Desired family size and the efficacy of current family planning programmes. Population Stud 23(2):279–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfe J, Bennett J, and Louviere J. 2000. Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. Ecol Econ 35(2):289–302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfe J, Bennett J, and Louviere J. 2002. Stated values and reminders of substitute goods: Testing for framing effects with choice modelling. Australian J Agric Resource Econ 46(1):1–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Pol Econ 82(1):34–55
   Google Scholar
• Schlaepfer F, et al. 2015. Valuation of landscape amenities: A hedonic pricing analysis of housing rents in urban, suburban and periurban Switzerland. Landscape Urban Planning 141:24–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siche JR, et al. 2008. Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices. Ecol Econ 66(4):628–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JT, Safford HD, and Latimer AM. 2014. Wildfire-contingent effects of fuel treatments can promote ecological resilience in seasonally dry conifer forests. Can J Forest Res-Rev Can De Rech Forestiere 44(8):843–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, and Zhu X. 2014. Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Energy Policy 69:397–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamblay S, et al. 2016. A zonal inference model based on observed smart-card transactions for Santiago de Chile. Transp Res Part a-Policy Practice 84:44–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner KG, et al. 2016. A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration. Ecol Modell 319:190–207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulibarri CA and Wellman KF. 1997. Natural Resource Valuation: A Primer on Concepts and Techniques [M]. Pacific Northwest Laboratory
   Google Scholar
• van Cranenburgh S, Chorus CG, and van Wee B. 2014. Vacation behaviour under high travel cost conditions – A stated preference of revealed preference approach. Tourism Manage 43:105–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Praag BMS and Baarsma BE. 2005. Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. Econ J 115(500):224–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van RAFJ. 2003. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technol Assess-Theory Practice 1(12):20–9
   Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam L. 2004. The contingent valuation method: A review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(1):89–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianna NJ and Polan AK. 1984. Incidence of low birth weight among Love Canal residents. Science 226(4679):1217–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuletic D, et al. 2009. Review of nonmarket forest goods and services evaluation methods. Periodicum Biologorum 111(4):515–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang N, et al. 2016. Cloud computing research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis. Dec Support Syst 86:35–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, et al. 2014. Collaboration network and pattern analysis: Case study of dye-sensitized solar cells. Scientometrics 98(3):1745–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe MDB and Ortega E. 2011. Ecosystem services and biogeochemical cycles on a global scale: Valuation of water, carbon and nitrogen processes. Environ Sci Policy 14(6):594–604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh FV. 1928. Quality factors influencing vegetable prices. J Farm Econ 10(2):185–96
   Google Scholar
• Whalley D. 1985. Hedonic price functions and progressive neighborhood improvement: A theoretical exploration. Math Social Sci 10(3):275–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead JC, et al. 2008. Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: An assessment of the state of the science. J Econ Surv 22(5):872–908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis KG and Garrod GD. 1991. An individual travel-cost method of evaluating forest recreation. J Agric Econ 42(1):33–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson MA and Carpenter SR. 1999. Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecol Appl 9(3):772–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Deng Y, and Liu H. 2014. House price index construction in the nascent housing market: The case of China. J Real Estate Finance Econ 48(3):522–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia T, et al. 2015. Traffic-related air pollution and health co-benefits of alternative transport in Adelaide, South Australia. Environ Int 74:281–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie S, Zhang J, and Ho Y-S. 2008. Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 77(1):113–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin X, Wu J, and Tsai W. 2012. When unconnected others connect: Does degree of brokerage persist after the formation of a multipartner alliance? Organ Sci 23(6):1682–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You W, Xu L, and Zhang J. 2013. Concept deviation analysis of recreation cost estimated by travel cost method. J Fujian Agric For Univ. Nat Sci Ed 42(1):80–5
   Google Scholar
• Zhou F, et al. 2014. Economic evaluation of the routine childhood immunization program in the United States, 2009. Pediatrics 133(4):577–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar