References
- Abaei MM, Arzaghi E, Abbassi R, et al. 2018. A robust risk assessment methodology for safety analysis of marine structures under storm conditions. Ocean Eng 156:167–78. doi:10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2018.02.016
- Abbasbandy S, and Amirfakhrian M. 2006. The nearest trapezoidal form of a generalized left right fuzzy number. Int J Approx Reason 43:166–78. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.04.001
- Abbassi R, Bhandari J, Khan F, et al. 2016. Developing a quantitative risk-based methodology for maintenance scheduling using Bayesian network. Chem Eng Trans 48:235–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET1648040
- Abimbola M, Khan F, and Khakzad N. 2014. Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling. J Loss Prev Process Ind 30:74–85. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2014.05.002
- Abimbola M, Khan F, Khakzad N, et al. 2015. Safety and risk analysis of managed pressure drilling operation using Bayesian network. Saf Sci 76:133–44. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.010
- Abuswer M, Amyotte P, and Khan F. 2013. A quantitative risk management framework for dust and hybrid mixture explosions. J Loss Prev Process Ind 26:283–9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.08.010
- Abuswer M, Amyotte P, Khan F, et al. 2016. Retrospective risk analysis and controls for Semabla grain storage hybrid mixture explosion. Process Saf Environ Prot 100:49–64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.12.007
- Adedigba SA, Khan F, and Yang M. 2017. Dynamic failure analysis of process systems using principal component analysis and Bayesian network. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:2094–106. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03356
- Adedigba SA, Khan F, and Yang M. 2016a. Process accident model considering dependency among contributory factors. Process Saf Environ Prot 102:633–47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.05.004
- Adedigba SA, Khan F, and Yang M. 2016b. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems using nonlinear and non-sequential accident model. Chem Eng Res Des 111:169–83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.04.013
- Aghajani Bazzazi A, Osanloo M, and Karimi B. 2011. Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: application of modified VIKOR method. Expert Syst Appl 38:2550–6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.043
- Ahmed Q, Anifowose FA, and Khan F. 2015. System availability enhancement using computational intelligence–based decision tree predictive model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 229, 612–26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748006X15595875
- Akyildiz H, and Mentes A. 2017. An integrated risk assessment based on uncertainty analysis for cargo vessel safety. Saf Sci 92:34–43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.09.009
- Atanassov KT. 2012. On the Concept of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, pp. 1–16. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29127-2_1
- Awasthi A, and Chauhan SS. 2011. Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions. Environ Model Softw 26:787–96. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.010
- Ayyub B. 2001. A practical guide on conducting expert-opinion elicitation of probabilities and consequences for corps facilities. Inst. Water Resour. Alexandria, VA, USA
- Ayyub BM. 2014. Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics, 2nd ed, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
- Bae H-R, Grandhi RV, and Canfield RA. 2004. An approximation approach for uncertainty quantification using evidence theory. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 86:215–25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.01.011
- Baksh A-A, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, et al. 2018. Marine transportation risk assessment using Bayesian Network: Application to Arctic waters. Ocean Eng 159:422–36. doi:10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2018.04.024
- Baksh AA, Khan F, Gadag V, et al. 2015. Network based approach for predictive accident modelling. Saf Sci 80:274–87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.003
- Banerjee S. 2003. Industrial Hazards and Plant Safety. Taylor & Francis, London, UK
- Barua S, Gao X, Pasman H, et al. 2016. Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment. J Loss Prev Process Ind 41:399–410. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.024
- Bhandari J, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, et al. 2015. Risk analysis of deepwater drilling operations using Bayesian network. J Loss Prev Process Ind 38:11–23. doi:10.1016/J.JLP.2015.08.004
- Bobbio A, Portinale L, Minichino M, et al. 2001. Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping Fault Trees into Bayesian Networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 71:249–60. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00077-6
- Bucelli M, Paltrinieri N, and Landucci G. 2018. Integrated risk assessment for oil and gas installations in sensitive areas. Ocean Eng 150:377–90. doi:10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2017.12.035
- Celik M, Lavasani SM, and Wang J. 2010. A risk-based modelling approach to enhance shipping accident investigation. Saf Sci 48:18–27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.04.007
- Chen S, Leng Y, Mao B, et al. 2014. Integrated weight-based multi-criteria evaluation on transfer in large transport terminals: A case study of the Beijing South Railway Station. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 66:13–26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.015
- Curcur G, Galante GM, and La Fata CM. 2012. Epistemic uncertainty in fault tree analysis approached by the evidence theory. J Loss Prev Process Ind 25:667–76. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.02.003
- Deng H, Yeh CH, and Willis RJ. 2000. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput Oper Res 27:963–73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6
- Deng X, Han D, Dezert J, et al. 2016. Evidence combination from an evolutionary game theory perspective. IEEE Trans Cybern 46:2070–82
- Deng X, Hu Y, Deng Y, et al. 2014a. Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers. Expert Syst Appl 41:635–43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.088
- Deng X, Hu Y, Deng Y, et al. 2014b. Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Syst Appl 41:156–67. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.018
- Deyab SM, Taleb-berrouane M, Khan F, et al. 2018. Failure analysis of the offshore process component considering causation dependence. Process Saf Environ Prot 113:220–32. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2017.10.010
- Du Y, Lu X, Su X, et al. 2016. New failure mode and effects analysis: an evidential downscaling method. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32:737–46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.1753
- El-Gheriani M, Khan F, Chen D, et al. 2017a. Major accident modelling using spare data. Process Saf Environ Prot 106:52–9. doi:10.1016/J.PSEP.2016.12.004
- El-Gheriani M, Khan F, and Zuo MJ. 2017b. Rare event analysis considering data and model uncertainty. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncert Eng Syst Part B Mech Eng 3:021008. doi:10.1115/1.4036155
- Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, et al. 2013. Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: an innovative approach. Process Saf Environ Prot 91:1–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.08.010
- Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, et al. 2012. Handling and updating uncertain information in bow-tie analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind 25:8–19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.06.018
- Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, et al. 2011. Fault and event tree analyses for process systems risk analysis: uncertainty handling formulations. Risk Anal 31:86–107. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01475.x
- Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, et al. 2009a. Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis. Process Saf Environ Prot 87:283–92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2009.07.003
- Ferdous R, Khan F, Veitch B, et al. 2009b. Methodology for computer aided fuzzy fault tree analysis. Process Saf Environ Prot 87:217–26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2009.04.004
- Ford DN, and Sterman JD. 1998. Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models. Syst Dyn Rev 14:309–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199824)14:4<309::AID-SDR154>3.0.CO;2-5
- Frey HC, and Patil SR. 2002. Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Anal 22:553–78. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00039
- Han DQ, Deng Y, Han CZ, et al. 2011. Weighted evidence combination based on distance of evidence and uncertainty measure. J Infrared Millim Waves 30:396–U126. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2863-4
- Han SS, and Chen WZ. 2008. The algorithm of dynamic battery SOC based on Mamdani fuzzy reasoning. Proceeding of the 5th International Conference in Fuzzy System. Knowledge Discovery, vol. 1, pp 439–43. Shandong, China. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2008.166[AQ2]
- Hashemi SJ, Ahmed S, and Khan FI. 2015. Loss scenario analysis and loss aggregation for process facilities. Chem Eng Sci 128:119–29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.01.061
- He Y, Hu LF, Guan X, et al. 2012. New method for measuring the degree of conflict among general basic probability assignments. Sci China Inf Sci 55:312–21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4346-0
- Hegde J, Utne IB, Schjølberg I, et al. 2018. A Bayesian approach to risk modeling of autonomous subsea intervention operations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 175:142–59. doi:10.1016/J.RESS.2018.03.019
- Hong Y, Pasman HJ, Sachdeva S, et al. 2016. A fuzzy logic and probabilistic hybrid approach to quantify the uncertainty in layer of protection analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind 43:10–17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.04.006
- Hossain MN, Amyotte PR, Khan FI, et al. 2013. Dust explosion quantitative risk management for nontraditional dusts. Chem Eng Trans 31:115–20. https://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET1331020
- Hsu H-M, and Chen C-T. 1996. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79:279–85. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00185-9
- Huang S, Su X, Hu Y, et al. 2014. A new decision-making method by incomplete preferences based on evidence distance. Knowledge-Based Syst 56:264–72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.11.019
- Jensen FV, and Nielsen TD. 2007. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2
- Jiang W, Wei B, Qin X, et al. 2016. Sensor data fusion based on a new conflict measure. Math Probl Eng 2016:1–35
- Jiang W, Xie C, Zhuang M, et al. 2017. Failure mode and effects analysis based on a novel fuzzy evidential method. Appl Soft Comput 57:672–83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.008
- Jing YY, Bai H, and Wang JJ. 2012. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for CCHP systems driven by different energy sources. Energy Policy 42, 286–96. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.085
- Kabir S. 2017. An overview of Fault Tree Analysis and its application in model based dependability analysis. Expert Syst Appl 77:114–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.058
- Kabir S, Yazdi M, Aizpurua JI, et al. 2018a. Uncertainty-aware dynamic reliability analysis framework for complex systems. IEEE Access 6:29499–515. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2843166
- Kabir S, and Papadopoulos Y. 2018. A review of applications of fuzzy sets to safety and reliability engineering. Int J Approx Reason 100:29–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2018.05.005
- Kabir S, Walker M, Papadopoulos Y, et al. 2016. Fuzzy temporal fault tree analysis of dynamic systems. Int J Approx Reason 77:20–37. doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2016.05.006
- Kabir S, Walker M, and Papadopoulos Y. 2018b. Dynamic system safety analysis in HiP-HOPS with Petri Nets and Bayesian Networks. Saf Sci 105:55–70. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.001
- Kabir S, Walker M, and Papadopoulos Y. 2014. Reliability analysis of dynamic systems by translating temporal fault trees into Bayesian networks. In: Ortmeier F, and Rauzy A (eds), Model-Based Safety and Assessment, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 96–109. Springer International Publishing, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12214-4_8
- Khakzad N, Khan F, and Amyotte P. 2013a. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Prot 91:46–53. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005
- Khakzad N, Khan F, and Amyotte P. 2013b. Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 109:5–17. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.009
- Khakzad N, Khan F, and Amyotte P. 2013c. Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: a Bayesian approach. Saf Sci 57:108–17. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022
- Khakzad N, Khan F, and Amyotte P. 2012. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 104:36–44. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003
- Khakzad N, Khan F, and Amyotte P. 2011. Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:925–932. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012
- Khan F, Rathnayaka S, and Ahmed S. 2015. Methods and models in process safety and risk management: past, present and future. Process Saf Environ Prot 98:116–47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005
- Khan FI, and Abbasi SA. 2000. Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure. J. Loss Prev Process Ind 14:43–59. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(00)00006-1
- Khan FI, Husain T, and Abbasi SA. 2002. Design and evaluation of safety measures using a newly proposed methodology “SCAP.” J Loss Prev Process Ind 15:129–46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(01)00026-2
- Khan FI, and Sadiq R. 2005. Risk-based prioritization of air pollution monitoring using fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique. Environ Monit Assess 105:261–83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-3852-1
- Kumar Tyagi S, Pandey D, and Tyagi R. 2010. Fuzzy set theoretic approach to fault tree analysis. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2:276–83. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijest.v2i5.60165
- Lavasani SM, Ramzali N, Sabzalipour F, et al. 2015a. Utilisation of Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) for quantified risk analysis of leakage in abandoned oil and natural-gas wells. Ocean Eng 108:729–37. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.008
- Lavasani SM, Zendegani A, and Celik M. 2015b. An extension to Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) application in petrochemical process industry. Process Saf Environ Prot 93:75–88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.05.001
- Lefevre E, Colot O, Vannoorenberghe P. 2002. Belief functions combination and conflict management. Inf Fusion J 3:149–62
- Li X, Chen G, Jiang S, et al. 2018. Developing a dynamic model for risk analysis under uncertainty: case of third-party damage on subsea pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 54:289–302. doi:10.1016/J.JLP.2018.05.001
- Li Z, Xiao F, Fei L, et al. 2017. An evidential failure mode and effects analysis using linguistic terms. Qual Reliab Eng Int 33:993–1010. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2075
- Liu H. 2016. FMEA Using Uncertainty Theories and MCDM Methods, pp 13–27. Springer, Singapore. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1466-6
- Liu J, Li Y, Sadiq R, et al. 2014. Quantifying influence of weather indices on PM2.5 based on relation map. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:1323–31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0905-4
- Markowski AS and Kotynia A. 2011. “Bow-tie” model in layer of protection analysis. Process Saf Environ Prot 89:205–13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.04.005
- Markowski AS and Mannan MS. 2009. Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA). J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:921–7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.06.011
- Markowski AS and Mannan MS. 2008. Fuzzy risk matrix. J Hazard Mater 159:152–7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.055
- Markowski AS, Mannan MS, and Bigoszewska A. 2009. Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:695–702. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2008.11.011
- Mateos A, and Jiménez A. 2009. A Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers-Based Approach for Aggregating Group Preferences and Ranking Decision Alternatives in MCDM, pp 365–379. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01020-0_30
- Miller G. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 101:343–52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
- Miri Lavasani MR, Wang J, Yang Z, et al. 2011. Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis on oil and gas offshore pipelines. Int J Mar Sci Eng 1:29–42
- Modarres M. 2006. Risk Analysis in Engineering: Techniques, Tools, and Trends. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida
- Modarres M. 1993. What Every Engineer Should Know About Reliability and Risk Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
- Modarres M, Kaminskly M, and Krivtsov V. 1999. Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
- Musharraf M, Hassan J, Khan F, et al. 2013. Human reliability assessment during offshore emergency conditions. Saf Sci 59:19–27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.04.001
- Nicolis JS and Tsuda I. 1985. Chaotic dynamics of information processing: The “magic number seven plus-minus two” revisited. Bull Math Biol 47:343–65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02459921
- Omidvari M, Lavasani SMR, and Mirza S. 2014. Presenting of failure probability assessment pattern by FTA in Fuzzy logic (case study: Distillation tower unit of oil refinery process). J Chem Heal Saf 21:14–22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2014.06.003
- Onisawa T. 1996. Subjective analysis of system reliability and its analyzer. Fuzzy Sets Syst 83:249–69. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00381-9
- Onisawa T. 1988. A representation of human reliability using fuzzy concepts. Inf Sci 45:153–73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(88)90038-2
- OREDA. 2002. Offshore Reliability Data Handbook, 4th ed. Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway
- Paltrinieri N and Khan F. 2016. Dynamic Risk Analysis in the Chemical and Petroleum Industry: Evolution and Interaction with Parallel Disciplines in the Perspective of Industrial Application. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK
- Pedrycz W. 1994. Why triangular membership functions? Fuzzy Sets Syst 64:21–30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90003-5
- Preyssl C. 1995. Safety risk assessment and management-the ESA approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 49:303–9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00047-6
- Purba JH, Lu J, Zhang G, et al. 2014. A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data processing. Fuzzy Sets Syst 243:50–69. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2013.06.009
- Rathnayaka S, Khan F, and Amyotte P. 2012. Accident modeling approach for safety assessment in an LNG processing facility. J Loss Prev Process Ind 25:414–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.09.006
- Rausand M. 2014. Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey
- Rausand M. 2011. Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, England, UK
- Rausand M and Høyland A. 2004. System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, England, UK
- Roberts NH and Vesely WE. 1987. Fault Tree Handbook. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
- Ross TJ. 2009. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. John Wiley & Sons, England, UK. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119994374
- Sadiq R, Najjaran H, and Kleiner Y. 2006. Investigating evidential reasoning for the interpretation of microbial water quality in a distribution network. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:63–73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0044-7
- Schubert J. 2011. Conflict management in Dempster-Shafer theory using the degree of falsity. Int J Approx Reason 52:449–60. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2010.10.004
- Shafer G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
- Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
- Smets P and Kennes R. 1994. The transferable belief model. Artif Intell 66:191–234. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)90026-4
- Song G, Khan F, Wang H, et al. 2016. Dynamic occupational risk model for offshore operations in harsh environments. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 150:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.021
- Talavera A, Aguasca R, Galván B, et al. 2013. Application of Dempster-Shafer theory for the quantification and propagation of the uncertainty caused by the use of AIS data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:95–105. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.007
- U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. 2014. Catastrophic Rupture of Heat Exchanger Tesoro AnacortesRefinery
- Villa V, Paltrinieri N, Khan F, et al. 2016. Towards dynamic risk analysis: A review of the risk assessment approach and its limitations in the chemical process industry. Saf Sci 89:77–93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.002
- Wang W, Shen K, Wang B, et al. 2017. Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using Bayesian networks. Process Saf Environ Prot 111:678–86. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.040
- Wei D, Deng X, Zhang X, et al. 2013. Identifying influential nodes in weighted networks based on evidence theory. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 392:2564–75. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.01.054
- Yager RR. 1987. On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules. Inf Sci 41:93–137. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(87)90007-7
- Yang J, Huang H-Z, He L-P, et al. 2011. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster–Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty. Eng Fail Anal 18:2084–92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.06.014
- Yang Z, Bonsall S, and Wang J. 2008. Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA. IEEE Trans Reliab 57:517–28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TR.2008.928208
- Yazdi M. 2017a. The application of bow-tie method in hydrogen sulfide risk management using layer of protection analysis (LOPA). J Fail Anal Prev 17:291–303. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0247-x
- Yazdi M. 2017b. Hybrid probabilistic risk assessment using fuzzy FTA and fuzzy AHP in a process industry. J Fail Anal Prev 17:756–64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0305-4
- Yazdi M. 2017c. An extension of fuzzy improved risk graph and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for determination of chemical complex safety integrity levels. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 0:1–11. doi:10.1080/10803548.2017.1419654
- Yazdi M, Daneshvar S, and Setareh H. 2017a. An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Saf Sci 98:113–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009
- Yazdi M, and Kabir S. 2017. A fuzzy Bayesian network approach for risk analysis in process industries. Process Saf Environ Prot 111:507–19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.015
- Yazdi M, Korhan O, and Daneshvar S. 2018. Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in process industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 0:1–32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1454636
- Yazdi M, Nikfar F, and Nasrabadi M. 2017b. Failure probability analysis by employing fuzzy fault tree analysis. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8:1177–93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0583-y
- Yazdi M and Zarei E. 2018. Uncertainty handling in the safety risk analysis: An integrated approach based on fuzzy fault tree analysis. J Fail Anal Prev 18:392–404. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0421-9
- Yuan Z, Khakzad N, Khan F, et al. 2015. Risk analysis of dust explosion scenarios using bayesian networks. Risk Anal 35:278–91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.12283
- Zadeh L. 1965. Fuzzy Sets. Inf Control 8:338–53
- Zadeh LA. 1986. Simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. AI Mag 7:85–90. https://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v7i2.542
- Zarei E, Azadeh A, Khakzad N, et al. 2017. Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network. J Hazard Mater 321:830–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074
- Zargar A, Sadiq R, and Naser G. 2012. Dempster-shafer theory for handling conflict in hydrological data: case of snow water equivalent. J Comput Civ Eng 26:434–48. https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000149
- Zhao L, Wang X, and Qian Y. 2012. Analysis of factors that influence hazardous material transportation accidents based on Bayesian networks: a case study in China. Saf Sci 50:1049–55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.003
- Zhou D, Tang Y, and Jiang W. 2016. A modified model of failure mode and effects analysis based on generalized evidence theory. Math Probl Eng 2016:11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4512383
- Zhou Q and Thai VV. 2016. Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction. Saf Sci 83:74–9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.013