Two-dimensional grey cloud clustering-fuzzy entropy comprehensive assessment model for river health evaluation

References

• Atanassov KT. 2012. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Control Theor Appl 20:87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bain MB, Harig AL, Loucks DP, et al. 2000. Aquatic ecosystem protection and restoration: Advances in methods for assessment and evaluation. Environ Sci Policy 3:89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Chessman BC. 2002. Assessing the conservation value and health of New South Wales rivers: The PBH (Pressure-Biota-Habitat) Project. Centre for Natural Resources, NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Deng JL. 1986. On basic methods of grey system. Press of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, pp 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Deng XJ, Xu YP, Zhai LX, et al. 2014. Establishment and application of the index system for urban river health assessment. Acta Ecol Sin 34:993–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Dong FY, Liu JJ, Liu B, et al. 2010. Improved grey integrated clustering method and its application in the evaluation to rural economic development of Henan province. Syst Sci Compr Stud Agric 26:478–83.
   Google Scholar
• Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J. 2001. Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118:467–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather PG. 1999. State of environment indicators of ‘river health’: exploring the metaphor. Freshw Biol 41:211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han C. 2015. The assessment and research of the Majia river's health. The Department of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
   Google Scholar
• Huang GR, Wu CH, Xiang BW. 2014. Health state assessment of water-based system for Dongjiang basin based on rough set theory and set pair. Syst Eng Theory Pract 34:1345–1351.
   Google Scholar
• Huang HP, Xu ZK, Li YL. 2015. River health based on cloud model of multi-level fuzzy comprehensive diagnosis: In Nanchang section of Ganjiang River. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 24:62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Jia L. 2016. River health assessment based on multi-factor model: A case study on water quality of Suzi river. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 33:28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Karr JR. 1999. Defining and measuring river health. Freshw Biol 41:221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson AR, White LJ, Doolan JA, et al. 1999. Development and testing of an index of stream condition for waterway management in Australia. Freshw Biol 41:453–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson AR. 2000. A multi-component indicator of stream condition for waterway managers: Balancing scientific rigour with the need for utility. The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Li DY, Liu CY. 2004. Study on the universality of the normal cloud model. Eng Sci 6:28–34 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Zhou WL, Yang FY. 2016. Evaluation of climate suitability of winter wheat based on cloud model analysis: a case study of Suzhou, Anhui Province. Chin J Eco-Agric 24:944–956.
   Google Scholar
• Li WJ, Qiu L, Chen XN. 2011. Assessment model for river ecology health based on set pair analysis and variable fuzzy set. J Hydraul Eng 39:775–782.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Liu ZY. 2016. Fuzzy self-adaptive ant colony algorithm based on cloud model. Comput Eng Appl 52:24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Liu DF, Wang D, Han D, et al. 2014. Eutrophication assessment by Entropy-Cloud model. J Hydraul Eng 45:1214–1222.
   Google Scholar
• Liu SF, Dang YG, Fang ZG, et al. 2010. Grey system theory and its application. Beijing: Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu SF, Forrest J, Yang YJ. 2012. A brief introduction to grey systems theory. Grey Syst Theor Appl 2:89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Liu SF. 2006. On index system and mathematical model for evaluation of scientific and technical strength. Kybernetes 35:1256–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Zhang JZ, Zhang YF. 2006. Indicators of the healthy Yellow river. Acta Geogr Sin 61:451–460.
   Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Tian WJ, Fan YY. 2013. Quantum adaptive immune clone algorithm based on cloud model. Chin J Comput Phys 30, 627–632 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JL. 1997. Stream health: Incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology. J North Am Benthol Soc 16:439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niekerk LV, Adams JB, Bate GC, et al. 2013. Country-wide assessment of estuary health: An approach for integrating pressures and ecosystem response in a data limited environment. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 130:239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris RH, Thoms MC. 2010. What is river health? Freshw Biol 41:197–209.
   Google Scholar
• Pang HM, Liu HZ. 2016. Study on food safety surveillance and risk assessment based on cloud model. J Food Sci Technol 34:90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons M, Thoms MC, Norris RH. 2004. Development of a standardised approach to river habitat assessment in Australia. Environ Monitor Assess 98:109–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapport DJ, Whitford WG. 1999. How ecosystems respond to stress? Bioscience 49:193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven PJ, Holmes NTH, Naura M, et al. 2000. Using river habitat survey for environmental assessment and catchment planning in the U.K. Hydrobiologia 422–423:359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield NJ, Davies PE. 1996. Measuring the health of our rivers. Water 23:39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Shan CJ, Dong ZC, Fan KM, et al. 2012. Application of combination weighting method to weight calculation in river health evaluation. J Hohai Univ (Natural Sciences) 40:622–628.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson JC, Norris RH, Wright JF, et al. 2000. Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs.[C]//Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. Proceedings of an International Workshop held in Oxford, UK, on 16–18 September 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Sun P, Jiang ZQ, Wang TT, et al. 2016. Research and application of parallel normal cloud mutation shuffled frog leaping algorithm in cascade reservoirs optimal operation. Water Resour Manag 30:1019–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang T, Cai QH, Liu JK. 2002. River ecosystem health and its assessment. Chin J Appl Ecol 13:1191–1194.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in wadeable streams and rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Verma R, Sharma BD. 2013. Exponential entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Kybernetika Praha 49:114–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vugteveen P, Leuven RSEW, Huijbregts MAJ, et al. 2006. Redefinition and elaboration of river ecosystem health: Perspective for river management. Hydrobiologia 565:289–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JQ, Wang P. 2012. Intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. Control Decis 27:1694–1698.
   Google Scholar
• Wang RY, Li Y. 2016. Risk evaluation of urban flood disaster based on entropy-cloud model. Water Resour Power 34:61–63; 86.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Xu X, Dong Z, Hu T. 2016. Assessment of river health based on projection pursuit-extension set theory. J Water Resour Water Eng 27:122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YD, Zhang XJ, Yan JM. 2013. Weight-varying gray cloud model based comprehensive evaluation on technical performance of overall grid-integration of wind farm. Power Syst Technol 37:3546–3551.
   Google Scholar
• Wei CP, Gao ZH, Guo TT. 2012. An intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measure based on trigonometric function. Control Decis 27:571–574.
   Google Scholar
• Weng LD. 2006. Ecological and environmental issues for the Yangtze basin. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 15:614–618.
   Google Scholar
• Wright JF, Furse MT, Moss D. 2010. River classification using invertebrates: RIVPACS applications. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 8:617–631.
   Google Scholar
• Xia J, Zhang Y, Zhao C, et al. 2014. Bioindicator assessment framework of river ecosystem health and the detection of factors influencing the health of the Huai River basin, China. J Hydrol Eng 19:481–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong HJ, Chen MY. 1999. Some problems on grey clustering. Syst Eng Electron 21:6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Xu WG, Zhang QY, Guo H, et al. 2006. Improvement and application of grey clustering model in atmospheric quality comprehensive evaluation. Math Practice Theor 36:200–205.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Chen X. 2015. Transformer status assessment based on cooperative game and cloud model. Electr Power Autom Equip 35:88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Xu ZK, Liu X, Wei BW, Zhang L, Wen YB. 2016. Tailings dam risk fuzzy evaluation model based on the cloud model. South North Water Transf Water Sci Technol 14:122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Yang K, Jiang LW, et al. 2016. Application of combination weighting method to weight calculation in river health evaluation. Water Resour Power 34:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8:338–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng W, Li H. 2006. Relationship between similarity measure and entropy of interval valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:1477–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai J, Xu GB, Guo SY, Wang YZ. 2016. Research on river health assessment method based on coordinated development degree. J Hydraul Eng 47:1465–1471.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang QS, Jiang SY. 2008. A note on information entropy measures for vague sets and its applications. Inform Sci 178:4184–4191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang QW, Zhang YZ, Zhong M. A cloud model based approach for multi-hierarchy fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of reservoir-induced seismic risk. J Hydraul Eng 45:87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q. 2002. The measure of grey characteristics of grey clustering result. Meas Grey Charac Grey Cluster Result V:54–56.
   Google Scholar