Study on public acceptance of nuclear power plants: Evidence from China

References

• Bar-Ilan J. 2005. Expectations versus reality–Search engine features needed for Web research at mid 2005. Cybermetrics 9(1), paper 2. Available at http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v9i1p2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Baruah P. 2011. Fukushima crisis triggers debate on the future of nuclear energy. Available at: http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments. Accessed on 20 February 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chen MF. 2010. Consumer trust in food safety—A multidisciplinary approach and empirical evidence from Taiwan. Risk Anal 28(6):1553–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). 2016. The statistical report of Chinese Internet development. Retrieved from http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201608/P020160803367337470363.pdf. Accessed 11 December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• China Nuclear Energy Association. 2015. China Nuclear Energy Yearbook 2015. China Atomic Energy, Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu C, Ip C, Silverman A. 2012. Understanding social media in China. McKinsey Q 2:78–81.
   Google Scholar
• Chung IJ. 2011. Social amplification of risk in the Internet environment. Risk Anal 31:1883–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook PA, Bellis MA. 2001. Knowing the risk: Relationships between risk behaviour and health knowledge. Public Health 115:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie D. 2009. Public health leaders using social media to convey emergencies: New tools a boon. The Nation's Health 39:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz G. 2014. Uranium mining and first peoples: The nuclear renaissance confronts historical legacies. J Clean Prod 84:339–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmück D, Scholz RW. 2005. Risk perception of heavy metal soil contamination by high-exposed and low-exposed inhabitants: The role of knowledge and emotional concerns. Risk Anal 25:37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
   Google Scholar
• Huang L, Zhou Y, Han Y, et al. 2013. Effect of the fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in china. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:19742–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joskow PL, Parsons JE. 2012. The future of nuclear power after fukushima. Econo Energy Env Pol 1:37–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung K, Han WP. 2014. Citizens’ social media use and homeland security information policy: Some evidences from twitter users during the 2013 North Korea nuclear test. Gov Inform Q 31:563–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsuya T. 2001. Public response to the Tokai nuclear accident. Risk Anal 21:1039–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keselman A, Slaughter L, Patel VL. 2005. Toward a framework for understanding lay public’s comprehension of disaster and bioterrorism information. J Biomed Inform 38:331–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerck D, Sweeney JC. 2007. The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychol Mark 24:171–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Perry RW. 2012. The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal 32:616–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molin E. 2005. A causal analysis of hydrogen acceptance. Transport Res Rec 1941:115–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mou Y, Lin C.A. 2014. Communicating food safety via the social media the role of knowledge and emotions on risk perception and prevention. Sci Commun 36:593–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA). 2010. Public attitudes to nuclear power. OECD Publishing. Available at https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/nuclear-energy/public-attitudes-to-nuclear-power_9789264097933-en#page1
   Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Rindova VP. 2003. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad Manage J 46:631–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prati G, Zani B. 2013. The effect of the fukushima nuclear accident on risk perception, antinuclear behavioral intentions, attitude, trust, environmental beliefs, and values. Environ. Behav 45:782–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Martin C, Ramirez-Ferrero M, Gonzalez-Alvarez JL, et al. 2015. Modeling of a nuclear emergency plan: Communication management. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21(5):1152–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutsaert P, Pieniak Z, Áine R, et al. 2014. Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach. Food Policy 46(3):84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Savadori L, Savio S, Nicotra E, et al. 2004. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Anal 24:1289–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl R, Moser C, Stauffacher M, et al. 2013. Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: Four opinion clusters. Risk Anal 33:1038–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Zhu X. 2014. Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Energy Policy 69:397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y. 2004. Major psychological factors determining public acceptance of the siting of nuclear facilities. J Appl Social Psychol 34:1147–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers VH, Keller C, Siegrist M. 2011. Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model. Energy Policy 39:3621–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers VH, Siegrist M. 2013. How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: Results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Anal 33:333–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C. 2013. The risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal 33:1049–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallquist L, Visschers VH, Siegrist M. 2010. Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS. Environ Sci Technol 44:6557–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei J, Zhu W, Marinova D, Wang F. 2017. Household adoption of smog protective behavior: A comparison between two Chinese cities. J Risk Res 20(7):846–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield SC, Rosa EA, Dan A, Dietz T. 2009. The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Anal 29(3):425–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2017. World nuclear power reactors & uranium requirements. http://world-nuclear.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Zuo J, Huisingh D. 2015. Social acceptance of wind power: A case study of Shandong Province, China. J Clean Prod 92:168–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Zuo J, Ma R, Wang Y. 2015. How would social acceptance affect nuclear power development? A study from China. J Clean Prod 163:179–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Wei J, Zhao D. 2016. Anti-nuclear behavioral intentions: The role of perceived knowledge, information processing, and risk perception. Energy Policy 88:168–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Xie X. 2015. Effects of knowledge on attitude formation and change toward genetically modified foods. Risk Anal 35:790–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar