High-Throughput Exposure Assessment Tool (HEAT) for exposure-based prioritization of chemicals

References

• Arnold SM, Greggs B, Goyak KO, et al. 2017. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations. Integr Environ Assess Manag 13:1007–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnot JA, Brown TN, Wania F, et al. 2012. Prioritizing chemicals and data requirements for screening-level exposure and risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 120:1565–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C. 2001. Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Manage Sci 47:250–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen Hubal EA, Richard A, Aylward L, et al. 2010. Advancing exposure characterization for chemical evaluation and risk assessment. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 13:299–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan-Ellsberry CE, and Robison SH. 2009. Refining aggregate exposure: example using parabens. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 55:321–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csiszar SA, Ernstoff AS, Fantke P, et al. 2016. High-throughput exposure modeling to support prioritization of chemicals in personal care products. Chemosphere 163:490–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellarco M, Zaleski R, Gaborek BJ, et al. 2017. Using exposure bands for rapid decision making in the RISK21 tiered exposure assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 47:317–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmaar C, Bremmer H, and Tuinman I. 2006. Experimental Validation of the Consumer Exposure Modeling Tool ConsExpo. Epidemiology 17:S182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmaar JE, Park MVDZ, and Engelen JGM. v. 2006. ConsExpo – Consumer Exposure and Uptake Models – Program Manual. pp. 72. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgenzondheid en Milieu RIVM
   Google Scholar
• Dentan A, Devanthery A, de Peyer JE, et al. 2000. Propylene glycol monomethyl ether (PGME) exposure: 2. Identification of products containing PGME, their importance and their use in Switzerland. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 73:311–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECCC (Environment and Climate Change Canada), Health Canada. 2017. Draft screening assessment ethylene glycol ethers. Environment Canada, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON
   Google Scholar
• ECETOC. 2005. The toxicology of glycol ethers and its relevance to man. Technical Report 95. ISSN-0773-8072-95. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2018a. Registration dossier for 1-methoxypropan-2-ol, CAS 107-98-2. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/14673/7/1
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2018b. Registration dossier for 2-(2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol, CAS 143-22-6. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/14102/7/1
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2018c. Registration dossier for 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol, CAS 112-34-5. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/15952/7/1
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2018d. Registration dossier for 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethanol, CAS 111-90-0. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/15867/7/1
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2018e. Registration dossier for 2-phenoxyethanol, CAS 122-99-6. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/15160/7/1
   Google Scholar
• Egeghy PP, Vallero DA, and Cohen-Hubal EA. 2011. Exposure-based prioritization of chemicals for risk assessment. Env Sci Pol 14:950–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embry MR, Bachman AN, Bell DR, et al. 2014. Risk assessment in the 21st century: roadmap and matrix. Crit Rev Toxicol 44:6 16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosens I, Delmaar CJE, Ter Burg W, et al. 2014. Aggregate exposure approaches for parabens in personal care products: A case assessment for children between 0 and 3 years old. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 24:208 14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer T, Gerner I, Gundert-Remy U, et al. 2004. Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation. Arch Toxicol 78:549–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs KK, Glen WG, Egeghy P, et al. 2014. SHEDS-HT: an integrated probabilistic exposure model for prioritizing exposures to chemicals with near-field and dietary sources. Environ Sci Technol 48:12750–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs MM, Malloy TF, Tickner JA, et al. 2016. Alternatives assessment frameworks: research needs for the informed substitution of hazardous chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 124:265–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayjock MA, Chaisson CF, Franklin CA, et al. 2009. Using publicly available information to create exposure and risk-based ranking of chemicals used in the workplace and consumer products. 2009. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 19:515 24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judson R, Kavlock R, Martin M, et al. 2013. Perspectives on validation of high-throughput assays supporting 21st century toxicity testing. ALTEX 30:51–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kavlock R, Chandler K, Houck K, et al. 2012. Update on EPA’s ToxCast program; providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. Chem Res Toxicol 25:1287 302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettenis P. D. 2005. The historic and current use of glycol ethers: A picture of change. Toxicol Lett 156:5–11 ):
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie ET, Heine LG, Holder H, et al. 2010. Chemical alternatives assessment: enabling substitution to safer chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 44:9244 9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little JC, Weschler CJ, Nazaroff WW, et al. 2012. Rapid methods to estimate potential exposure to semivolatile organic compounds in the indoor environment. Environ Sci Technol 46:11171–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek ME, Boobis AR, Crofton KM, et al. 2011. Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: A WHO/IPCS framework. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 60:S1–S14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2014. A Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2007. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• OSPA (Oxygenated Solvents Producers Association). 2018. Resources for E-series and P-series glycol ethers. Available at http://www.glycol-ethers.eu/index.php/overview
   Google Scholar
• Price P, and Han X. 2011. Maximum cumulative ratio (MCR) as a tool for assessing the value of performing a cumulative risk assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:2212–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safford B, Api AM, Barratt C, et al. 2015. Use of an aggregate exposure model to estimate consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients in personal care and cosmetic products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 72:673–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarigiannis DA, and Hansen U. 2012. Considering the cumulative risk of mixtures of chemicals – a challenge for policy makers. Environ Health 11:S1–S18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer PJ. 2005. New toxicity data for the propylene glycol ethers – a commitment to public health and safety. Toxicol Lett 156:181–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Berge W. 2000. Mathematical Models for Estimating Occupational Exposure to Chemicals. pp.106. AIHA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2001. General Principles for Performing Aggregate Exposure and Risk Assessments. Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition (Final Report). EPA/600/R-09/052F. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1991. Chemical Engineering Branch Manual for the Preparation of Engineering Assessments (CEB). Contract No. 68-D8-0112. V. 1. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2004. Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures and Environmental Releases. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances. Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2016. Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows (EpiSuite), v 4.11. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Wambaugh JF, Setzer RW, Reif DM, et al. 2013. High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the ExpoCast project. Environ Sci Technol 47:8479–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh JF, Wang A, Dionisio KL, et al. 2014. High throughput heuristics for prioritizing human exposure to environmental chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 48:12760 7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehage K, Chenhansa P, and Schoenung JM. 2017. An open framework for automated chemical hazard assessment based on GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals: A proof of concept. Integr Environ Assess Manag 13:167–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westat. 1987. National usage survey of household cleaning products. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Wilson MP, and Schwarzman MR. 2009. Toward a new U.S. chemicals policy; rebuilding the foundation to advance new science, green chemistry, and environmental health. Environ Health Perspect 117:1202 9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F. 2018. Validation of the GastroPlusTM software tool and applications. Available at https://www.simulations-plus.com/assets/2016-SOT-BMSS-Talk-Dow-Chemical.pdf
   Google Scholar