Is “going green” good to all? Evidence from South Korea

References

• Almeida H, Kim CS, and Kim HKB. 2015. Internal capital markets in business groups: Evidence from the Asian financial crisis. J Finance 70:2539–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt E, Ezde-Castro D, ´Llore EP, et al. 2015. Linking employee stakeholders to environmental performance: The role of proactive environmental strategies and shared vision. J Bus Ethics 128:167–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt E and Spitzeck H. 2016. Improving environmental performance through unit-level organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment: A capability perspective. J Environ Manag 182:48–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambec S and Lanoie P. 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manag Pers 22:45–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arregle JL, Hitt MA, and Sirmon DG. 2007. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. J Manage Studies 44:73–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker W and Sinkula JM. 2005. Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. J Acad Mark Sci 33:461–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbulescu A. 2017. Modeling the impact of the human activity, behavior and decision on environment. J Environ Manag 204:813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendersky C and Hay NA. 2012. Status conflict in groups. Organ Sci 23:323–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrone P, Cruz C, and Gómez MLR. 2010. Socioemtional wealth and corporate response to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Adm Sci Q 55:82–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand M and Schoar A. 2006. The role of family in family firms. J Econ Pers 20:73–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boling JR, Pieper TM, and Covin JG. 2016. CEO tenure and entrepreneurial orientation within family and non-family firms. Enterep Theory Pract 40:891–913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brough AR, Wilkie JB, Ma JJ, et al. 2016. Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption. J Consum Res 43:567–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Ioannou I, and Serafeim G. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strat Mgmt J 35:1–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen DM, Dhaliwal DS, Boivie S, et al. 2015. Top management conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers’ personal political orientation and corporate tax avoidance. Strat Mgmt J 36:1918–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens S, Djankov S, and Lang LHP. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. J. Financ Econ 58:81–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coff RW. 1997. Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. AMR 22:374–402
   Google Scholar
• Curran B and Walsworth S. 2014. Can you pay employees to innovate? Evidence from the Canadian private sector. Hum Resour Manage 24:290–306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels F. 2002. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competence. Strat Mgmt J 23:1095–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL and Jaskiewicz P. 2013. Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. J Manag Stud 50:337–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas MA and Burbano VC. 2011. The drivers of green washing. Calif Manag Rev 54:64–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz H and Villalonga B. 2001. Ownership structure and corporate performance. J Corp Finan 7:209–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont J, Shen J, and Deng X. 2017. Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Hum Resour Manage 56:613–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham L, Freeman RE, and Liedtka J. 2006. Enhancing stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Bus Ethics Q 16:23–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman MS and Pentland BT. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Adm Sci Q 48:94–118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flammer C and Luo J. 2017. Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Strat Mgmt J 38:163–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
   Google Scholar
• Gershoff AD and Frel JK. 2015. What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products. J Mark 79:97–110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía LR, Haynes KT, Núñez-Nickel M, et al. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Adm Sci Q 52:106–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon M, Lockwood M, Vanclay F, et al. 2012. Divergent stakeholder views of corporate social responsibility in the Australian forest plantation sector. J Environ Manag 113:390–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer M and Bingham T. 2013. Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions. J Bus Res 66:1945–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JS and Wicks AC. 2013. Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Bus Ethics Q 23:97–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison SH and Wagner DT. 2016. Spilling outside the box: The effects of individuals’ creative behaviors at work on time spent with their spouses at home. AMJ 59:841–59
   Google Scholar
• Henry PC. 2010. How mainstream consumers think about consumer right and responsibilities. J Consum Res 37:670–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ. 2005. Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. Calif Manag Rev 47:21–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoi PV, Mol APJ, and Oosterveer PJM. 2009. Market governance for safe food in developing countries: The case of low pesticide vegetables in Vietnam. J Environ Manag 91:380–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou I and Serafeim G. 2012. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. J Int Bus Stud 43:834–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iranmanesh M, Zailani S, Moeinzadeh S, et al. 2017. Effect of green innovation on job satisfaction of electronic and electrical manufacturers’ employees through job intensity: Personal innovativeness as moderator. Rev Manag Sci 11:299–313
   Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz P, Combs JG, and Rau SB. 2015. Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entreprenurship. J Bus Ventur 30:29–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia M, Tong L, Viswanath PV, et al. 2016. Word power: The impact of negative media coverage on disciplining corporate pollution. J Bus Ethics 138:437–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y and Peng MW. 2011. Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant? Asia Pac J Manag 28:15–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HJ and Kim DO. 2016. Good neighbors but bad employers: Two faces of corporate social responsibility programs. J Bus Ethics 138:295–310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HY, Kim HJ, and Oh KW. 2016. Green leather for ethical consumers in China and Korea: Facilitating ethical consumption with Value–Belief–Attitude logic. J Bus Ethics 135:483–502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EH and Lyon TP. 2015. Greenwash vs. Brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organ Sci 26:705–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Jeong SJ, Cho YJ, et al. 2014. Eco-friendly manufacturing strategies for simultaneous consideration between productivity and environmental performances: A case study on a printed circuit board manufacturing. J Clean Prod 67:249–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YS. 2017. Consumer response to the food industry’s proactive and passive environmental CSR, factoring in price as CSR tradeoff. J Bus Ethics 140:307–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong A, Kammerlander N, and Enders A. 2013. The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. AMR 38:418–41
   Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Pierce L, and Gino F. 2012. The psychological costs of pay-for-performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strat Mgmt J 33:1194–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SM, Noh YH, Choi DH, et al. 2017. Environmental policy performance for sustainable development: From the perspective of ISO 14001 certification. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Mgmt 24:108–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Cui JH, and Jo HJ. 2016. Corporate environmental responsibility and risk. J Bus Ethics 139:563–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SH, Wu HY, and Song XZ. 2017. Principal-principal conflicts and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese private firms. J Bus Ethics 141:605–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Zeng SX, Wang LY, et al. 2016. How does environmental irresponsibility corporate reputation? A multi-method investigation. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Mgmt 23:413–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YC and Chang CCA. 2012. Double standard: The role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. J Mark 76:125–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins KV, Volpin P, and Wagner HF. 2013. Does family control matter? International evidence from the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Rev Financ Stud 10:2583–619
   Google Scholar
• Long XL, Chen YQ, Du JG, et al. 2017. Environmental innovation and its impact on economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Korean-owned firms in China. Energy Policy 107:131–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro SMC, Dias Sardinha IM, and Reijnders L. 2012. The effect of corporate social responsibility on consumer satisfaction and perceived value: The case of the automobile industry sector in Portugal. J Clean Prod 37:172–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masulis RW and Reza SW. 2015. Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Rev Financ Stud 28:592–636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng XH, Zeng SX, Leung AWT, et al. 2015. Relationship between top executives’ characteristics and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21:466–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng XH, Zeng SX, Xie XM, et al. 2016. The impact of product market competition on corporate environmental responsibility. Asia Pac J Manag 33:267–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, and Wood DJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who or what really counts. AMR 22:853–86
   Google Scholar
• Mullins W and Schoar A. 2016. How do CEOs see their roles? Management philosophies and styles in family and non-family firms. J Finan Econ 119:24–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman GE, Gorlin M, and Dhar R. 2014. When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. J Consum Res 41:823–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh H, Bae J, and Kim SJ. 2017. Can sinful firms benefit from advertising their CSR efforts? Adverse effect of advertising sinful firms’ CSR engagements on firm performance. J Bus Ethics 143:643–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh WY, Chang YK, and Martynov A. 2011. The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. J Bus Ethics 104:283–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng MW, Tan J, and Tong TW. 2004. Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy. J Manage STUD 41:7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng MW, Wang DYL, and Jiang Y. 2008. An institutional-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. J Int Bus Stud 39:920–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell G and Posner BZ. 1978. Resistance to change reconsidered: Implications for managers. Hum Resour Manage 17:29–34
   Google Scholar
• Qi GY, Zeng SX, Shi JJ, et al. 2014. Revisiting the relationship between environmental and financial performance in Chinese industry. J Environ Manag 145:349–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiu YM and Yang SL. 2017. Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance-like effects? Strat Mgmt J 38:455–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S, DeCelles KA, and Dutton JE. 2014. It’s not easy being green: The role of self-evaluations in explaining support of environmental issues. AMJ 57:7–37
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan V, Stilley KM, and Ahluwalia R. 2009. When brand personality matters: The moderating role of attachment styles. J Consum Res 35:985–1002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson M, Maclnnis DJ, and Park CW. 2005. The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumer emotional attachments to brands. J Consum Psychol 15:77–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoutsoura M. 2015. The effect of succession taxes on family firm investment: Evidence from a natural experiment. J Finance 70:649–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalonga B and Amit R. 2006. How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value? J Finan Econ 80:385–417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls JL, Berrone P, and Phan PH. 2012. Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strat Mgmt J 33:885–913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You Y, Vadakkepatt GG, and Joshi AM. 2015. A meta-analysis of electronic word-of-mouth elasticity. J Mark 79:19–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng SX, Tam CM, Tam VWY, and Deng ZM. 2005. Towards implementation of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in selected industries in China. J Clean Prod 13:645–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng SX, Meng XH, Zeng RC, et al. 2011. How environmental driving forces affect environmental and economic performance of SMEs: A study in the Northern China district. J Clean Prod 19:1426–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zewlleger TM and Dehlen T. 2012. Value is in the eye of the owner: Affect infusion and socioemotional wealth among. Family Firm Owners Fam Bus Rev 25:280–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou KZ, Yim CK, and Tse DK. 2005. The effect of strategic orientations on technology-and market-based breakthrough innovation. J Mark 69:42–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou HL, Zeng SX, Qi GY, et al. 2017. Do environmental violations affect corporate loan financing? Evidence from China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 23:1775–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar