Public perceptions of climate change adaptation in Singapore dealing with forecasted sea level rise

References

• Akerlof K and Maibaach WE. 2014. Adapting to Climate Change & Sea Level Rise: A Maryland Statewide Survey, Fall 2014. Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C. 2010. Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ 74:141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett J, Waters E, Pendergast P, et al. 2013. Barriers to Adaptation to Sea-Level Rise: The Legal, Institutional and Cultural Barriers to Adaptation to Sea-Level Rise in Australia. The Universityof Melbourne, National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast, 85 pp..
   Google Scholar
• Blake J. 1999. Overcoming the “value-action gap” in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environ 4:257–78.
   Google Scholar
• Burger J, Gochfeld M, Pittfield T, et al. 2016. Perceptions of climate change, sea level rise, and possible consequences relate mainly to self-valuation of science knowledge. Energy Power Eng 08:250–62.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess J, Harrison CM, and Filius P. 1998. Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environ Plan A 30:1445–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary MR and Stokes S. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: The Politics of Trust in Argentina and Mexico. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz T, Kalof L, and Stern PC. 2002. Gender, values, and environmentalism. Soc Sci Q 83:353–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap RE, Liere KDV, Mertig AG, et al. 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56:425–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flake JK, Pek J, and Hehman E. 2017. Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practices and recommendations. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 8:370–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, and Davidson L. 2002. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 36:717–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen A and Vogl D. 2013. Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environ Change 23:1001–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fünfgeld H. 2010. Institutional challenges toclimate risk management in cities. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:156–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Games PA, and Howell JF. 1976. Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal n s and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study. J Educ Stat 1:113–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gelissen J. 2007. A multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environ Behav 39:392–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall MP, Lewis NA, Jr, and Ellsworth PC. 2018. Believing in climate change, but not behaving sustainably: Evidence from a one-year longitudinal study. J Environ Psychol 56:55–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen J, Sato M, and Ruedy R. 2012. Perception of climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E2415–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawcroft LJ and Milfont TL. 2010. The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 30:143–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkel J, Lincke D, Vafeidis AT, et al. 2014. Coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3292–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes J and Clark R. 2008. Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation. Environ Sci Policy 11:702–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt A and Watkiss P. 2011. Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: A review of the literature. Climatic Change 104:13–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISSP (International Social Science Programme) 2010. ISSP 2010 - “Environment III”. Retrieved from http://www.gesis.org/issp/modules/issp-modules-by-topic/environment/2010/. Accessed 1 June 2017.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RB and Onwuegbuzie AJ. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33:14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Klineberg SL, McKeever M, and Rothenbach B. 1998. Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it’s measured. Soc Sci Q 79(4):734–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss A and Agyeman J. 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people behave environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour. Environ Educ Res 8:239–60.
   Google Scholar
• Konisky DM, Milyo J, and Richardson LE. 2008. Environmental policy attitudes: issues, geographic scale, and political trust. Soc Sci Q 89:1066–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuthe A, Körfgen A, Stötter J, et al. 2019. Strengthening personal concern and the willingness to act through climate change communication. In: Leal Filho W, Lackner B, and McGhie H (eds), Addressing the Challenges in Communicating Climate Change Across Various Audiences. Climate Change Management, pp 65–79. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz A. 2006. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77:45–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky S and Oberauer K. 2016. Motivated rejection of science. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 25:217–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levene H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In Contributions to Probability and Statistics, vol. 1, pp 278–92. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni I and Pidgeon NF. 2006. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change 77:73–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquart-Pyatt ST. 2012. Contextual influences on environmental concerns cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation. Soc Sci Res 41:1085–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSS (Meteorological Service Singapore for Climate Research Singapore) 2015. Singapore’s Second National Climate Change Study: Climate Projections to 2100. National Environment Agency, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• NCCS (Singapore National Climate Change Secretariat) 2012. National Climate Change Strategy. https://www.nccs.gov.sg/sites/nccs/files/NCCS-2012.pdf. Accessed 1 June 1017.
   Google Scholar
• Ng WS and Mendelsohn R. 2006. The economic impact of sea-level rise on nonmarket lands in Singapore. Ambio 35:289–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordgren J, Stults M, and Meerow S. 2016. Supporting local climate change adaptation: Where we are and where we need to go. Environ Sci Policy 66:344–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards L. 2014. Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, US.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite D, Huq S, Pelling M, et al. 2007. Adapting to climate change in urban areas: the possibilities and constraints in low and middle income nations. Hum Settlements 58:1–112
   Google Scholar
• Schaffers H, Komninos N, Pallot M, et al. 2011. Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In The Future Internet Assembly, pp. 431–446. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH. 1999. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Appl Psychol 48:23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz N and Oyserman D. 2001. Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. Am J Eval 22:127–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs L and Benegal S. 2012. Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environ Change 22:505–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS and Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siau Ming E. 2016. The Big Read: Receding water levels at Linggiu Reservoir expose S pore’s vulnerability. Retrieved from http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/receding-water-levels-linggiu-reservoir-expose-spores-vulnerability. Accessed 1 June 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Simons DJ, Shoda Y, and Lindsay DS. 2017. Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspect Psychol Sci 12:1123–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloman SA. 1996. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 119:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 1987. The perception of risk. Science 236:280–5. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, and Pidgeon NF. 2011. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Change 1:46–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel TD, et al. 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6:81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A and Corbin J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas MJ. 2013. Public and Expert Perceptions of Sea-level Change on the Severn Estuary. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Tkalich P,Vethamony P, Luu QH, et al. 2013. Sea level trend and variability in the Singapore Strait. Ocean Sci 9:293–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ, Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ. 2008. Towards successful adaptation to sea-level rise along Europe’s coasts. J Coastal Res 24:432, and 450 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend AM. 2001. The Internet and the rise of the new network cities, 1969–1999. Environ Plann B Plann Des 28:39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey JW. 1949. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5:99–114 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar S. 2000. Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: Climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Underst Sci 9:297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Habitat 2016. World Cities Report 2016 Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures, pp 1327–1370.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Vagias WM. 2006. Measure: Likert-Type Scale Response Anchors. Clemson University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wardekker JA, de Jong A, Knoop JM, et al. 2010. Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77:987–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber EU. 2010. What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wires Clim Change 1:332–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch BL. 1947. The generalization of student’s problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34:28–35 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whatmore SJ and Landström C. 2011. Flood apprentices: An exercise in making things public. Econ Soc 40:582–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C and McCright AM. 2015. Gender differences in environmental concern: Revisiting the institutional trust hypothesis in the USA. Environ Behav 47:17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefpour R and Hanewinkel M. 2016. Climate change and decision-making under uncertainty. Curr Forestry Rep 2:143–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar