The assessment of occupational safety and health in Turkey by applying a decision-making method; MULTIMOORA

References

• ACSHB. 2017. (December 23). Statistics in Turkey year. Retrieved from http://www.ssk.gov.tr/sskdownloads/anasayfa/istatistik/istatistik2017/default.html
   Google Scholar
• Akalp G, Aytac S, Yamankaradeniz N, et al. 2015. Perceived safety culture and occupational risk factors among women in metal industries: A study in Turkey. Proc Manuf 3:4956–63.
   Google Scholar
• Akgöbek Ö, Nişancı İ, Kaya S, and Eren T. 2015. Using data envelopment analysis approach for measuring the performance of the branch of an educational institution. Social Sci Res J 4:43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Altunkaynak B. 2018. A statistical study of occupational accidents in the manufacturing industry in Turkey. Int J Ind Ergonom 66:101–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiyari M, Delpisheh A, Riahi SM, et al. 2012. Epidemiology of occupational accidents among Iranian insured workers. Saf Sci 50:1480–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baležentis A and Baležentis T. 2011. Assessing the efficiency of Lithuanian transport sector by applying the methods of MULTIMOORA and data envelopment analysis. Transport 26:263–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM. 2003. Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society: A Revolution in Economic Thinking by Multi-objective Optimization, 1st ed., p 352. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. M. (2004). Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society: A Revolution in Economic Thinking by Multi-objective Optimization, Springer, Kluwer Acdemic Publishers, Series: Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, Vol. 73, p. 342
   Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM and Zavadskas EK. 2006. The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control Cybernet 35:445–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM and Zavadskas EK. 2010. Is robustness really robust? Robustness from the point of view of statistics and econometrics with an application for multi-objective optimization. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, pp 17–42. Nova Science, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM and Zavadskas EK. 2012. Robustness of MULTIMOORA: A method for multi-objective optimization. Informatica 23:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM, Kracka M, and Zavadskas EK. 2012. Lithuanian case study of masonry buildings from the Soviet period. J Civ Eng Manag 18:444–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK, Peldschus F, and Turskis Z. 2008. Multi-objective decision-making for road design. Transport 23:183–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty S. 2011. Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:1155–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembe A. 2004. The social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses. Am J Ind Med 40:403–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dizdar EN. 1998. A prognostic model for possible occupational accidents in production systems (Doctoral dissertation). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Dizdar EN and Koçar O. 2018. Adaptive network based fuzzy inspection system for estimating occupational accident. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Occupational Safety and Healthy, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Dizdar EN, Koçar O, and Çetiner E. 2018. Analysis of OSH activities in mining sector with multivariate decision making methods. In: Proceedings of the 3nd International Conference on Occupational Safety and Security, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Dizdar EN, Koçar O, and Keskinkılıç İ. 2018. Evaluation of possible risks by adaptive linear neuron in OSH management systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Occupational Safety and Healthy, İstanbul, Turkey
   Google Scholar
• Dizdar EN, Ünver M, Koçar O, and Dönmez S. 2018. Analysis of construction sector OSH performance with multivariate decision-making methods. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Occupational Safety and Healthy, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Dizdar EN and Koçar O. 2016. Determination of precautions against occupational accidents using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Safety and Health, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Dizdar EN and Özer K. 2011a. Revolutionary advances in OSH: Last decade in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the XIX World Congress on Safety and Healthy at Work, pp. 576, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Dizdar EN and Özer K. 2011b. Problems and solutions of Turkey’s OSH organizations. In: Proceedings of the XIX World Congress on Safety and Healthy at Work, pp. 577, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Ergör OA, Demiral Y, and Piyal YB. 2003. A significant outcome of work life: Occupational accidents in a developing country, Turkey. J Occupat Health 45:74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry. 2009. European SMEs under Pressure e Annual Report on Eu Small and Medium-sized Enterprises 2009. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Gadakh VS. 2011. Application of MOORA method for parametric optimization of milling. Int J Appl Eng Res 1:743–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gul M and Guneri AF. 2016. A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 40:89–100 doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Ak MF, and Guneri AF. 2017. Occupational health and safety risk assessment in hospitals: A case study using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 23:187–202 DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2016.1234363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M. 2018. A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 24:1723–60 DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1424531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen P, Saarela KL, and Takala J. 2009. Global trend according to estimated number of occupational accidents and fatal work-related diseases at region and country level. J Saf Res 40:125–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen P, Takala J, and Saarela KL. 2006. Global estimates of occupational accidents. Saf Sci 44:137–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamurcu M and Eren T. 2016. A multicriteria decision-making for monorail route selection in Ankara. Int J Ind Electron Electric Eng 4:121–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hamurcu M and Eren T. 2017. Selection of monorail technology by using multicriteria decision making. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci 8:303–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hamurcu M, Gür Ş, Özder EH, and Eren T. 2016. A multicriteria decision making for monorail projects with analytic network process and 0-1 goal programming. Int J Adv Electron Comput Sci 3:8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich HW. 1959. Industrial accident prevention. McGraw-Hill Book Company, London.
   Google Scholar
• Iç YT. 2012. An experimental design approach using TOPSIS method for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28:245–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İlhan A, Koşar G, Karapınar A, and Gedik T. 2013. Analysis of underlying causes of the occupational accidents and diseases in furniture manufacturing in Sakarya province. Kastamonu Univ J For Fac 13:202–10.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. 2017. (July 10). Safety and health at work. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-andhealth-at-work/lang–en/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jana TK, Bairagi B, Paul S, et al. 2013. Dynamic schedule execution in an agent based holonic manufacturing system. J Manuf Syst 32:801–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracka M and Zavadskas EK. 2013. Panel building refurbishment elements effective selection by applying multiple-criteria methods. Int J Strategic Prop Manag 17:210–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubler S, Robert J, Derigent W, et al. 2016. A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Syst Appl 65:398–422 DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HC, You JX, Lu C, and Chen YZ. 2015. Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 41:932–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrotas G and Trifillis P. 2006. Multicriteria decision analysis with minimum information: Combining DEA with MAVT. Comput Oper Res 33:2083–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mete S. 2019. Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 1 DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1546115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikitani M and Yano E. 2008. Differences in the lethality of occupational accidents in OECD countries. Saf Sci 46:1078–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streimikiene D and Balezentis T. 2013. Multi-objective ranking of climate change mitigation policies and measures in Lithuania. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 18:144–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streimikiene D, Balezentis T, Krisciukaitienė I, and Balezentis A. 2012. Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 16:3302–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou E and Baig K. 2005. The impact of aggregating benefit and cost criteria in four MCDA methods. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 52:213–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ünsar S and Sut N. 2009. General assessment of the occupational accidents that occurred in Turkey between the years 2000 and 2005. Saf Sci 47:614–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar