Ecological reservoir operation based on DFM and improved PA-DDS algorithm: A case study in Jinsha river, China

References

• Ahmad A, El-Shafie A, Razali SFM, et al. 2014. Reservoir optimization in water resources: A review. Water Resour Manage 28:3391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaya AB, Souissi A, Tarhouni J, et al. 2003. Optimization of Nebhana reservoir water allocation by stochastic dynamic programming. Water Resour Manage 17:259–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadzadeh M, and Tolson BA. 2009. A new multi-objective algorithm, pareto archived DDS, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2009, Proceedings, Montreal, Québec, Canada, July 8–12, 2009, Companion Material, pp. 1963–1966.
   Google Scholar
• Asadzadeh M, and Tolson B. 2013. Pareto archived dynamically dimensioned search with hypervolume-based selection for multi-objective optimization. Eng Optim 45:1489–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban X, and Damei L. 2007. Ecological hydrological influence of large water conservancy projects on Acipenser Sinensis in Yangtze River. Eng J Wuhan Univ. 40:10–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn SE, and Arthington AH. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage 30:492–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioffi F, and Gallerano F. 2012. Multi-objective analysis of dam release flows in rivers downstream from hydropower reservoirs. Appl Math Model 36:2868–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consoli, S, Matarazzo, B, and Pappalardo, N. 2008. Operating rules of an irrigation purposes reservoir using multi-objective optimization. Water Resources Management, 22(5): 551–64
   Google Scholar
• Dai L, Zhang P, Wang Y, et al. 2017. Multi-objective optimization of cascade reservoirs using NSGA-II: A case study of the Three Gorges-Gezhouba cascade reservoirs in the middle Yangtze River, China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 23:814–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K. 2001. Nonlinear goal programming using multi-objective genetic algorithms. J Oper Res Soc 52:291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, and Meyarivan T. 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Computat 6:182–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhart R, and Kennedy J. 2002. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, Mhs95 Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine & Human Science.
   Google Scholar
• Gouthamkumar N, Sharma V, and Naresh R. 2015. Disruption based gravitational search algorithm for short term hydrothermal scheduling. Exp Syst Appl 42:7000–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghighi AT, and Klove B. 2015. Development of monthly optimal flow regimes for allocated environmental flow considering natural flow regimes and several surface water protection targets. Ecol Eng 82:390–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homa ES. 2005. An optimization approach for balancing human and ecological flow needs. World Water Congress 2005: Impacts of Global Climate Change - Proceedings of the 2005 World Water an: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Howson HR, and Sancho NGF. 1975. A new algorithm for the solution of multi-state dynamic programming problems. Math Program 8:104–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager HI, and Smith BT. 2008. Sustainable reservoir operation: Can we generate hydropower and preserve ecosystem values? River Res Appl 24:340–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin NI, Cui S, Tian LI, and Jin L. 2002. On water demand of river ecosystem. J Hydr Eng 33:14–9.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles JD, Corne DW, and Fleischer M. 2003. Bounded archiving using the lebesgue measure IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2490–7.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, and Kang L. 2014. A new modified tennant method with spatial-temporal variability. Water Resour Manage 28:4911–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, and Qiu J. 2015. Multi-objective reservoir optimization balancing energy generation and firm power. Energies 8:6962–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Xia Z, Ma G, and Guo L. 2007. A new monthly frequency computation method for instream ecological now. Acta Ecol Sin 27:2916–21.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhao J, and Zheng H. 2018. Piecewise-linear hedging rules for reservoir operation with economic and ecologic objectives. Water 10:865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie A, Ball A, and Virdee S. 2001. BIOS Instant Notes in Ecology (Instant Notes Series). 2nd ed. UK: BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd., 20–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews RC, Jr., and Bao Y. 1991. The Texas method of preliminary instream flow assessment. Rivers 2:295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Rani D, and Moreira MM. 2010. Simulation–optimization modeling: A survey and potential application in reservoir systems operation. Water Resour Manage 24:1107–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renofalt BM, Jansson R, and Nilsson C. 2010. Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Freshwater Biol 55:49–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suen J. 2011. Determining the ecological flow regime for existing reservoir operation. Water Resour Manage 25:817–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suen JP, and Eheart JW. 2006. Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. Water Resour Res 42:178–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan G, Yi R, Chang J, et al. 2018. A new method for calculating ecological flow: Distribution flow method. AIP Adv 8:045118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang R, Zhang C, Ding W, et al. 2017. Use of multi-objective analysis to reveal the benefits of a water transfer project. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 17:259–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant DL. 1976. Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1:6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Tharme RE. 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai W, Chang F, Chang L, et al. 2015. AI techniques for optimizing multi-objective reservoir operation upon human and riverine ecosystem demands. J Hydrol 530:634–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhou J, Lu P, et al. 2015. Long-term scheduling of large cascade hydropower stations in Jinsha River, China. Energy Convers Manage 90:476–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Brill ED, Ranjithan RS, et al. 2015. A framework for incorporating ecological releases in single reservoir operation. Adv Water Resour 78:9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Guo S, Li L, et al. 2016. Multi-objective operating rules for danjiangkou reservoir under climate change. Water Resour Manage 30:1183–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Guo S, Liu P, et al. 2017. Multiobjective cascade reservoir operation rules and uncertainty analysis based on PA-DDS algorithm. J Water Resour Plann Manage 143:04017025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin XA, Yang ZF, and Petts GE. 2012. Optimizing environmental flows below dams. River Res Appl 28:703–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Wang C, Wang P, et al. 2017. Assessment of multi-objective reservoir operation in the middle and lower Yangtze River based on a flow regime influenced by the Three Gorges Project. Ecol Inform 38:115–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Li J, Chen X, et al. 2011. Evaluation of the ecological instream flow in the Yellow River basin with hydrological alterations. Acta Ecol Sin 31:4826–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Liao X, Ouyang S, et al. 2014. Multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm for short-term scheduling of hydrothermal system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 55:542–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar